Case law

Quiland, Inc. v. Wells Sanitary District

2006 Me. 113 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 12, 2006

Peregrine Developers, LLC v. Town of Orono, 2004 ME 95, ¶ 9 , 854 A.2d 216, 219 . … See Kroeger v. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 2005 ME 50, ¶ 8 , 870 A.2d 566, 569 ; Phaiah v. Town of Fayette, 2005 ME 20, ¶ 9 , 866 A.2d 863, 866 .

Ducharme v. City of Biddeford

110 Me. 6 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 11, 1912

Andrews v. Portland, 79 Maine, 484; Dolliver v. Parks, 136 Mass., 499 ; Phelon v. Granville, 140 Mass., 386 . … In Cote v. Biddeford, 96 Maine, 491, the court in re-affirming the doctrine of Andrews v.

Bradley v. Warren

104 Me. 423 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1908

This question arose upon a closely analogous provision of the will in Taylor v. Brown, 88 Maine, 56. … Brown and Nellie Washburn, children of my wife’s sister.”

Titcomb v. Saco Mobile Home Sales, Inc.

544 A.2d 754 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 26, 1988

See Hull v. L & A Montagnard Social Club, Inc., 498 A.2d 597, 598 (Me.1985); Dongo v. Banks, 448 A.2d 885, 889 (Me.1982). … Decesere v. Thayer, 468 A.2d 597, 598 (Me.1983) (quoting Michaud v. Steckino, 390 A.2d 524, 530 (Me.1978)) (emphasis added).

Rush v. County of Aroostook

447 A.2d 478 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 12, 1982

See Sheltra v. Auger, Me., 376 A.2d 463 (1977). … Gordon v. Guernsey, 316 Mass. 106, 108 , 55 N.E.2d 27, 28 (1944).

Mitchell v. City of Rockland

41 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1856

Thayer v. Boston, 19 Pick. 511 . … The restriction against the coming on shore of persons on board of vessels, arriving in port, is applied to vessels having on board other contagious sickness than that of the plague.

Dow v. Bradley

110 Me. 249 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 22, 1913

Fisher v. *252 Shaw, 42 Maine, 32, 39; Chase v. McLellan, 49 Maine, 375; Stetson v. Everett, 59 Maine, 376; Brown v. Lawton, 87 Maine, 83. … Brown v. Lawton, supra. In Schroeder v. Young, 161 U. S., 334, 344 , the Supreme Court of the United States, speaking by Mr.

Marton v. Town of Ogunquit

759 A.2d 704 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 2, 2000

DeSomma v. Town of Casco, 2000 ME 113, ¶ 7 , 755 A.2d 485, 487 . … (quoting Gerald v.

Keith v. Saco River Corridor Commission

464 A.2d 150 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 3, 1983

Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 180 Conn. 296 , 429 A.2d 883, 885 (1980); Petruzzi v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 176 Conn. 479 , 408 A.2d 243, 246 (1979); People v. … But see Schneider v. Board of Appeals, 402 Ill. 536 , 84 N.E.2d 428 (1949); Keller v. City of Bellingham, 92 Wash.2d 726 , 600 P.2d 1276 (1979).

State v. Maine State Employees Ass'n

538 A.2d 755 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 23, 1988

See Lynch v. Town of Kittery, 473 A.2d 1277, 1279 (Me.1984); State v. Gleason, 404 A.2d 573, 578 (Me. 1979). … See State v. Maine Labor Relations Board, 413 A.2d 510, 515 (Me.1980).

Owen v. Boyle

22 Me. 47 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1842

The same doctrine is fully recognized by the Court of King’s Bench, in the ease of Brown v. Shevill, 2 Adol. & Ellis, 138, and the authority of the cases before cited fully confirmed. Matthias v. … Gibson, in the case of Brown v.

State v. Cress

344 A.2d 57 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1975

In State v. … State v. Kouconles, 1974, Me., 343 A.2d 860 . In State v.

Christian Fellowship & Renewal Center v. Town of Limington

769 A.2d 834 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 24, 2001

See Goldstein v. … Town of Danville, 148 Vt. 624 , 538 A.2d 168, 169 (1987) (remanding because of inadequate findings of state tax board); Scott v.

Livermore Falls Trust & Banking Co. v. Riley

108 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1911

Woodbury v. Gardner, 77 Maine, 68. In such a case "the defendants are estopped to set up the statute of frauds in defense.” Low v. Low, 173 Mass. 580 . In 4 Pom. Eq. … See also McGuire v. Murray, 107 Maine, ( 77 Atl. 692 ), and Bank v. Marston, 85 Maine, 488. In Harrisburg Bank v.

Darney v. Dragon Products Co., LLC

994 A.2d 804 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 11, 2010

Brown v. Crown Equip. … See Adams v.

Lafontain v. Hayhurst

89 Me. 388 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1896

She cites the case of Cook v. Bates, 88 Maine, 455. In Cook v. … Thereupon the plaintiff sued for the board, and it was held that a promise to pay for the board could be inferred. The plaintiff expected compensation not in money, but in money’s worth, in the defendant’s labor.

Tuscan v. Smith

130 Me. 36 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 23, 1931

Crampton v. Zabriskie, 101 U. S., 601 . … Blood v. Beal, 100 Me., 30; Reynolds v. Waterville, 92 Me., 292; Eaton v. Thayer, supra. If therefore the action of the selectmen of the Town of Skowhegan in giving the lease here in question to Myron E.

Stage Neck Owners Ass'n v. Poboisk

726 A.2d 1261 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1999

Although only three of the five director positions on the Board of Directors were filled at the time of the vote, the Association’s bylaws did not prohibit the Board from taking action while there were vacancies on the Board … Cook v. Lisbon Sch. Comm., 682 A.2d 672, 676 (Me.1996). Section 1603-116 creates an automatic lien for any assessment levied against a condominium unit and establishes the process for enforcement.

Haley v. Davenport

132 Me. 148 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 16, 1933

Paine v. Savage, 126 Me., 121, 136 A., 664 ; Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me., 351, 61 A., 785 . … Brown v. Gerald, supra. The Court there said, page 370: “Neither mere public convenience nor mere public welfare will justify the exercise of the right of eminent domain. Kinnie v. Bass, 68 Mich., 625 , 36 N. W., 672 .

Frank v. Manpower Temporary Services

687 A.2d 623 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 24, 1996

Fowler v. First Nat’l Stores, Inc., 416 A.2d 1268 , 1260 (Me.1980) (quoting Landry v. Bates Fabrics, Inc., 889 A.2d 311, 313 (Me.1978)). … Though we agree the employee must offer evidence to establish his or her average weekly wage, White v.