Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,972 results
1.46s
93 Me. 220 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 16, 1899
I never at any time agreed with him that he should not pay board. Nothing was said between Mr. Clary and me in regard to his board.” The case of LaFontain v. … In that case, as in this, board was not furnished in consideration of a promise of marriage, but, rather, on account of the relations existing between the parties by reason of such a prior promise. In LaFontain v.
Cited 1 timesPublished8 A.3d 666 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 2010
Bar R. 7.3(j)(5), (6); Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v. Campbell, 539 A.2d 208, 209 (Me.1988). Certainly this process must comport with due process requirements. Schware v. … Lefebvre, 1998 ME 24, ¶ 15 , 707 A.2d at 73 ; Bd. of Overseers of the Bar v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedOur Way Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Wells
535 A.2d 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 13, 1988
When the Superior Court acts as an intermediate appellate court reviewing the action of a board of appeals, we examine directly the record as developed before the Board. Marchi v. … Ballard Builder v. City of Westbrook, 502 A.2d 476, 480 (Me.1985) (citing Putnam v. Town of Hampden, 495 A.2d 785, 787 (Me.1985)).
Cited 1 timesPublished18 Me. 12 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1840
This point was decided in the case of Russell v. Richards et al. 1 Fairf. 429, to which we refer. … Hilborn v. Brown et al. 3 Fairf. 162.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn re Weapons Restriction of J.
2022 ME 34 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 2022
See State v. Brown, 571 A.2d 816, 816 (Me. 1990). … Brown, 571 A.2d at 820 (emphasis added).
Cited 8 timesPublished84 Me. 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 28, 1891
Workman v. Worcester, 118 Mass. 168 ; Stone v. Charlestown, 114 Mass. 214 . Section one of the registration act provides : "A board of registration is hereby established in each city of the State,” &c. … Eyston v. Studd, Plowd. 465.
Cited 3 timesPublishedAlfred J. Sweet, Inc. v. City of Auburn
134 Me. 28 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 29, 1935
Tremont and Suffolk Mills v. City of Lowell, 271 Mass., 1 , 170 N. E., 819 ; Central Realty Co. v. Board of Review, 110 W. Va., 437 , 158 S. E., 537 ; Somers v. City of Meriden, 174 A., 184 (Conn. 1934). … Spear v. City of Bath, supra; Central Realty Co. v. Board of Review, supra; Underwood Typewriter Co. v. City of Hartford, 99 Conn., 329 , 122 A., 91 ; Massachusetts General Hospital v.
Cited 44 timesPublished50 Me. 442 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1862
The bill of sale from Brown & Lee to Chase is prima facie to be deemed the act of the firm and binding on them. "When a contract,” remarks Mr. Justice Story, in U. S. Bank v. … Church v. Sparrow, 5 Wend., 223 ; Tucker v. Peaslee, 36 N. H., 167. The language used was sufficient to satisfy the defendants that it was a firm debt for the payment of which, they advanced their note.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCoulombe v. Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Maine, Inc.
809 A.2d 613 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 1, 2002
In Ciampi v. Hannaford Bros. … See also Jasch v. Anchorage Inn, 2002 ME 106, ¶ 9 , 799 A.2d 1216, 1218 ; Russell v.
Cited 4 timesPublished683 A.2d 774 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 30, 1996
Sargent, Inc. v. Town of Wells, 676 A.2d 920, 923 (Me.1996). “The interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law that is guided by the language, objectives, and general structure of the ordinance.” Dyer v. … Bushey v. Town of China, 645 A.2d 615, 618 (Me.1994) (citing 82 Am.Jur.2d Zon *776 ing and Planning § 287 (1992 & Supp. 1994)).
Cited 5 timesPublished1999 Me. 162 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 2000
In Ross v. … See Farrow v. Carr Bros.
Cited 5 timesPublished202 A.3d 524 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 12, 2019
See Paul v. … Planning Board denied Dubois Livestock's application.
Cited 7 timesPublished553 A.2d 1259 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 3, 1989
On review we examine directly, as does the Superior Court, the decision of the Board and the record as developed before the Board. Marchi v. Town of Scarborough, 511 A.2d 1071, 1072 (Me.1986). … LaPointe v. City of Saco, 419 A.2d 1013, 1015 (Me.1980) (citations omitted).
Cited 3 timesPublishedHarding v. Sheridan D. Smith, Inc.
647 A.2d 1193 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 8, 1994
The Board, however, denied the employer’s petitions for award and apportionment. In an appeal from a decision of the Board, we will “generally accept the findings of fact and examine only for errors of law.” Somes v. … We will not overturn a decision of the Board unless it can be said that the Board lacks a “rational basis for its application of law to the facts.” Dorey v. Forster Mfg. Co., 591 A.2d 240, 241-42 (Me.1991); Smith v.
Cited 10 timesPublished918 A.2d 1203 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 10, 2007
See, e.g., Shackford & Gooch, Inc. v. … IV, § V (1994).
Cited 5 timesPublished635 A.2d 941 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 21, 1993
In reviewing a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, we generally accept the findings of fact and examine only for errors of law. LeBlanc v. United Eng’rs & Constructors Inc., 584 A.2d 675, 677 (Me.1991). … Dorey v. Forster Mfg. Co., 591 A.2d at 242 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedFrye v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.
129 Me. 289 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 30, 1930
Feingold v. Supovitz, 117 Me., 371; Davies v. Steamboat Co., 94 Me., 379, 385; Heath v. Stoddard, 91 Me., 499; 21 R. C. L., 856, 907; 2 C. J., 461. … Packard v. Insurance Co., 77 Me., 144; Thorne v. Casualty Co., 106 Me., 274, 281.
Cited 9 timesPublishedNorthern Maine General Hospital v. Ricker
572 A.2d 479 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 29, 1990
Moyer v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 233 A.2d 311, 316 (Me.1967). … In Penobscot Area, Etc v.
Cited 4 timesPublished489 A.2d 525 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 26, 1985
Sirois v. Town of Frenchville, 441 A.2d 291, 294 (Me.1982). … See Perry v. Town of Friendship, 2 37 A.2d 405 , 407 (Me.1968); Belfast & Moosehead Lake Railway Co. v. Inhabitants of Brooks, 60 Me. 568, 573 (1872); Austin & Blaisdell v. Inhabitants of York, 57 Me. 304, 305 (1869).
Cited 6 timesPublished594 A.2d 1098 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 2, 1991
Taylor v. … See Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health, 481 A.2d at 152 . III.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna