Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
5,972 results
0.27s
Department of Mental Health & Corrections v. Bowman
308 A.2d 586 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 1973
In State Board of Education v. … Carter v. Wilkins, 160 Me. 290 , 203 A.2d 682 (1964); State Board of Education v. Coombs, supra.
Cited 3 timesPublished55 A.3d 456 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 2012
Hanson v. S.D. *459 Warren Co., 2010 ME 51, ¶ 12 , 997 A.2d 730 . … See 39-A M.R.S. § 304; 7 Wilson, 2008 ME 47, ¶ 7, 942 A.2d 1237 ; Stickles v. United Parcel Serv., 554 A.2d 1176, 1179 (Me.1989). C. Wilson v.
Cited 5 timesPublished386 A.2d 721 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 1978
Brown, a coastal warden for the Department of Marine Resources. … Seeing the encounter going against them, both Chief Gray and Warden Brown unhol-stered their revolvers to maintain the arrests.
Cited 14 timesPublished206 A.3d 907 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 2019
Stewart-Dore v. Webber Hosp. … Galouch v. Dep't of Prof'l & Fin. Regulation , 2015 ME 44 , ¶ 12, 114 A.3d 988 (quotation marks omitted).
Cited 5 timesPublishedNortheast Harbor Golf Club, Inc. v. Harris
725 A.2d 1018 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1999
See generally State v. … See Ostrowski v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedFryeburg Water Co. v. Town of Fryeburg
893 A.2d 618 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 2006
Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, ¶ 6 , 746 A.2d 368, 371 (quotation marks omitted); see also Rowe v. City of S. Portland, 1999 ME 81, ¶ 4 , 730 A.2d 673, 674 ; Pearson v. … Timeliness [¶ 16] In Wright v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEstate of Robbins v. Town of Cumberland
154 A.3d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 2017
Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v. Town of Kittery, 2004 ME 65, ¶ 10 , 856 A.2d 1183 . B. … Corp. v. Town of Washington, 2007 ME 31, ¶ 7 , 916 A.2d 973 . “[I]f the meaning of the ... ordinance is clear, we need not look beyond the words themselves.” Wister v. Town of Mt.
Cited 1 timesPublishedStephen A. Clark Jr. v. Town of Phippsburg
2025 ME 25 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2025
Stiff v. … Generally speaking, select boards decide whether the municipality should go to court to stop a violation. See Pepperman v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOttinger v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.
635 A.2d 948 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1993
One employee noted after the accident that the banana was medium brown in color. … Chasse v. Mazerolle, 622 A.2d 1180, 1182 (Me.1993).
Cited 1 timesPublished95 Me. 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 1901
Libby v. Mayberry, 80 Maine, 137; Ladd v. Dickey, 84 Maine, 190. … Andrews v. Senter, 32 Maine, 394; Ladd v. Dickey, 84 Maine, 190.
Cited 4 timesPublished529 A.2d 798 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1987
Because the Superior Court here acted as an intermediate appellate court reviewing the Board’s actions, we directly examine the record developed before the Board. Kittery Water District v. … Curtis v. Main, 482 A.2d 1253, 1257 (Me.1984).
Cited 2 timesPublishedSanford Highway Unit of Local 481 v. Town of Sanford
411 A.2d 1010 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1980
See Rockwell v. Board of Education, 393 Mich. 616 , 227 N.W.2d 736, 746 (1975). … (emphasis in original) National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedBartlett v. Town of Stonington
707 A.2d 389 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1998
Cook v. Lisbon School Comm., 682 A.2d 672, 676 (Me.1996) (citation omitted). … Cook v. Lisbon School Comm., 682 A.2d at 676 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedMaine School Administrative District No. 15 v. Raynolds
413 A.2d 523 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 16, 1980
Licensing Board, 157 Me. 411 , 173 A.2d 554 (1961); at length in City of Biddeford v. Biddeford Teachers Association, Me., 304 A.2d 387 (1973); and most recently in State v. Dube, Me., 409 A.2d 1102 (1979). … See Roussel v. State, Me., 274 A.2d 909, 926 (1971); Boutet v. Planning Board of City of Saco, Me., 253 A.2d 53, 56 (1969).
Cited 38 timesPublishedFort Fairfield Nash Co. v. Noltemier
135 Me. 84 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1937
.” *89 In Stewart v. Smith, supra, our Court accepted the law as enounced in Brown v. … Reason therefor was given in the following quotation from Brown v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSawyer v. Town of Cape Elizabeth
852 A.2d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2004
DISCUSSION [¶ 10] The Planning Board’s interpretation of the open space zoning standards of the zoning ordinance is a question of law that we review de novo. Isis Dev., LLC v. … Town of Ogunquit, 1998 ME 42 , 709 A.2d 106 , and York v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedEagle Rental, Inc. v. City of Waterville
632 A.2d 130 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 15, 1993
State v. Niles, 585 A.2d 181, 182 (Me.1990). … See Tyler Equipment Corp. v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMcIntyre v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.
743 A.2d 744 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2000
Folsom v. New England [Tel. & Tel. Co.], 606 A.2d 1035 (Me.1992); See also Hafford v. Kelly, 421 A.2d 51 (Me.1980). … Id. at 1009-10 ; Poitras v. R.E. Glidden Body Shop, 430 A.2d 1113, 1118 (Me.1981). Dumond v.
Cited 10 timesPublished54 Me. 196 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866
Browne on Stat. of Frauds, §§ 508, 513 ; Cahill v. Bigelow & trustee, 18 Pick., 369 ; R. S., c. 82, § 18; Rule 9, of this Court. This view of the law disposes of the principal questions discussed in this case. … Such an agreement is undoubtedly within the ftmrth clause of the statute of frauds ; (Browne on Stat. of Frauds, § 266, and authorities there cited,) and *201 this fact, if the defendant had seasonably and in a proper manner
Cited 8 timesPublished359 A.2d 69 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1976
The purpose of the Appeals Board has been previously recognized to be the minimization and speedy resolution of labor disputes within the public sector. State Board of Education v. Coombs, Me., 308 A.2d 582 (1973). … See Lewiston Firefighters Association v. City of Lewiston, Me., 354 A.2d 154 (1976). To better achieve that purpose, the Legislature made mediation and arbitration before the Appeals Board mandatory.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna