Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersme

5,972 results

0.27s

  • Department of Mental Health & Corrections v. Bowman

    308 A.2d 586 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 1973

    In State Board of Education v. … Carter v. Wilkins, 160 Me. 290 , 203 A.2d 682 (1964); State Board of Education v. Coombs, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Graves v. Brockway-Smith Co.

    55 A.3d 456 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 15, 2012

    Hanson v. S.D. *459 Warren Co., 2010 ME 51, ¶ 12 , 997 A.2d 730 . … See 39-A M.R.S. § 304; 7 Wilson, 2008 ME 47, ¶ 7, 942 A.2d 1237 ; Stickles v. United Parcel Serv., 554 A.2d 1176, 1179 (Me.1989). C. Wilson v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Powers

    386 A.2d 721 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 18, 1978

    Brown, a coastal warden for the Department of Marine Resources. … Seeing the encounter going against them, both Chief Gray and Warden Brown unhol-stered their revolvers to maintain the arrests.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Town of Den.

    206 A.3d 907 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 2019

    Stewart-Dore v. Webber Hosp. … Galouch v. Dep't of Prof'l & Fin. Regulation , 2015 ME 44 , ¶ 12, 114 A.3d 988 (quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Northeast Harbor Golf Club, Inc. v. Harris

    725 A.2d 1018 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1999

    See generally State v. … See Ostrowski v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Fryeburg Water Co. v. Town of Fryeburg

    893 A.2d 618 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 30, 2006

    Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor, 2000 ME 30, ¶ 6 , 746 A.2d 368, 371 (quotation marks omitted); see also Rowe v. City of S. Portland, 1999 ME 81, ¶ 4 , 730 A.2d 673, 674 ; Pearson v. … Timeliness [¶ 16] In Wright v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Estate of Robbins v. Town of Cumberland

    154 A.3d 1183 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 26, 2017

    Kittery Retail Ventures, LLC v. Town of Kittery, 2004 ME 65, ¶ 10 , 856 A.2d 1183 . B. … Corp. v. Town of Washington, 2007 ME 31, ¶ 7 , 916 A.2d 973 . “[I]f the meaning of the ... ordinance is clear, we need not look beyond the words themselves.” Wister v. Town of Mt.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Stephen A. Clark Jr. v. Town of Phippsburg

    2025 ME 25 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2025

    Stiff v. … Generally speaking, select boards decide whether the municipality should go to court to stop a violation. See Pepperman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ottinger v. Shaw's Supermarkets, Inc.

    635 A.2d 948 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1993

    One employee noted after the accident that the banana was medium brown in color. … Chasse v. Mazerolle, 622 A.2d 1180, 1182 (Me.1993).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Burgess v. Robinson

    95 Me. 120 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 1, 1901

    Libby v. Mayberry, 80 Maine, 137; Ladd v. Dickey, 84 Maine, 190. … Andrews v. Senter, 32 Maine, 394; Ladd v. Dickey, 84 Maine, 190.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Bishop v. Town of Eliot

    529 A.2d 798 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 17, 1987

    Because the Superior Court here acted as an intermediate appellate court reviewing the Board’s actions, we directly examine the record developed before the Board. Kittery Water District v. … Curtis v. Main, 482 A.2d 1253, 1257 (Me.1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sanford Highway Unit of Local 481 v. Town of Sanford

    411 A.2d 1010 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 21, 1980

    See Rockwell v. Board of Education, 393 Mich. 616 , 227 N.W.2d 736, 746 (1975). … (emphasis in original) National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Bartlett v. Town of Stonington

    707 A.2d 389 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1998

    Cook v. Lisbon School Comm., 682 A.2d 672, 676 (Me.1996) (citation omitted). … Cook v. Lisbon School Comm., 682 A.2d at 676 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Maine School Administrative District No. 15 v. Raynolds

    413 A.2d 523 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 16, 1980

    Licensing Board, 157 Me. 411 , 173 A.2d 554 (1961); at length in City of Biddeford v. Biddeford Teachers Association, Me., 304 A.2d 387 (1973); and most recently in State v. Dube, Me., 409 A.2d 1102 (1979). … See Roussel v. State, Me., 274 A.2d 909, 926 (1971); Boutet v. Planning Board of City of Saco, Me., 253 A.2d 53, 56 (1969).

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Fort Fairfield Nash Co. v. Noltemier

    135 Me. 84 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1937

    .” *89 In Stewart v. Smith, supra, our Court accepted the law as enounced in Brown v. … Reason therefor was given in the following quotation from Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sawyer v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

    852 A.2d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2004

    DISCUSSION [¶ 10] The Planning Board’s interpretation of the open space zoning standards of the zoning ordinance is a question of law that we review de novo. Isis Dev., LLC v. … Town of Ogunquit, 1998 ME 42 , 709 A.2d 106 , and York v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Eagle Rental, Inc. v. City of Waterville

    632 A.2d 130 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 15, 1993

    State v. Niles, 585 A.2d 181, 182 (Me.1990). … See Tyler Equipment Corp. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • McIntyre v. Great Northern Paper, Inc.

    743 A.2d 744 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 12, 2000

    Folsom v. New England [Tel. & Tel. Co.], 606 A.2d 1035 (Me.1992); See also Hafford v. Kelly, 421 A.2d 51 (Me.1980). … Id. at 1009-10 ; Poitras v. R.E. Glidden Body Shop, 430 A.2d 1113, 1118 (Me.1981). Dumond v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. Chase

    54 Me. 196 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1866

    Browne on Stat. of Frauds, §§ 508, 513 ; Cahill v. Bigelow & trustee, 18 Pick., 369 ; R. S., c. 82, § 18; Rule 9, of this Court. This view of the law disposes of the principal questions discussed in this case. … Such an agreement is undoubtedly within the ftmrth clause of the statute of frauds ; (Browne on Stat. of Frauds, § 266, and authorities there cited,) and *201 this fact, if the defendant had seasonably and in a proper manner

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Woodcock v. Atlass

    359 A.2d 69 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 11, 1976

    The purpose of the Appeals Board has been previously recognized to be the minimization and speedy resolution of labor disputes within the public sector. State Board of Education v. Coombs, Me., 308 A.2d 582 (1973). … See Lewiston Firefighters Association v. City of Lewiston, Me., 354 A.2d 154 (1976). To better achieve that purpose, the Legislature made mediation and arbitration before the Appeals Board mandatory.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.