Case law

SIERRA CLUB, Et Al. v. DOMINION COVE POINT LNG, L.P.

216 Md. App. 322 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 28, 2014

Before the Court of Appeals, the plaintiffs argued that under the language of the qualified domestic relations orders, the DROP payments did not qualify as pension payments and therefore, the former wives were not entitled … This clearly means that natural gas may be sent both ways – to and from the Terminal Operation site.

Sun Cab Co. v. Walston

15 Md. App. 113 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 17, 1972

The Court said, at page 331: “It is the practice, to establish damages in a case like this, to prove joint life expectancy by an actuary who uses established mortality tables, and annuity tables, showing a sum of money that … Appellees attempted to establish an intent on the part of Mrs.

In Re Adoption No. 09598 in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County

77 Md. App. 511 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 4, 1989

During a five-day trial, in addition to establishing Mr. … Evidence further established that Brandon has strong emotional ties with the T.’s.

White v. State

248 Md. App. 67 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 1, 2020

Chimel established unequivocally the now universally established geography—the range in space—of the Search Incident to Lawful Arrest. Feaster, 206 Md.App. 231, described Chimel’s mandate. … DID THE STATE QUALIFY FOR THE INEVITABLE DISCOVERY EXEMPTION FROM THE SANCTION OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE? No.

State v. WBAL-TV

187 Md. App. 135 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 17, 2009

The court clearly intended its ruling to be final and complete, with no qualifications. … Even if the Order did not qualify as a final order, it would qualify as an immediately appealable collateral order for both the State and Gaumer.

White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'n

173 Md. App. 13 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 6, 2007

The deed created by the Turners that conveyed The Pines to the company of which Leonidas was the president, and the plats accompanying that conveyance, clearly establish a waterfront community. … The PCIA does not qualify as a homeowner’s association under authority of the Maryland Homeowner’s Association Act (The Act). 14 A duly qualified homeowner’s association under The Act requires that a declaration be recorded

Baltimore Police Dept. v. Antonin

237 Md. App. 348 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 2018

is as strong as their duty to refrain from presiding when not qualified. . . . … statement, made in response to the filing of criminal charges against Antonin, communicated what should be obvious, that the BPD does not approve of officers breaking the law to enforce the law, i.e., that officers are not immune

Deyermond v. State

19 Md. App. 698 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 11, 1974

Deyermond and Steger each expressly confirmed that no one had “made any promises of a lesser sentence, probation, immunity or anything else in order to induce [him] to plead *701 guilty other than the plea bargaining by [ … It is firmly established that “[a] plea of guilty may be accepted effectively when the record shows that it was made voluntarily, unconditionally, and with an intelligent understanding of the nature of the offense and the

Dove v. Childs

173 Md. App. 602 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 4, 2007

In 1955, the Meyns established EvMar Mobile Home Village (“the Park”) on the property. The property is zoned R-MH (residential — mobile home). … Appellants were "qualified residents.” 5 .

Booze v. State

111 Md. App. 208 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Aug 28, 1996

According to Snead, this concept is “clearly at odds with the State’s burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” Once again, we see it differently. … Rule 4-312(g) provides: “Designation of List of Qualified Jurors.—Before the exercise of peremptory challenges, the court shall designate from the jury list those jurors who have qualified after examination.

Boone v. State

2 Md. App. 80 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 28, 1967

This determination depends upon whether the State has met the burden of proof of establishing that the confession was freely and voluntarily made. … Appellant as his seventh contention, alleges that this was “clearly improper” because of the contradictory nature of the counts.

Bonds v. State

51 Md. App. 102 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 3, 1982

We may not set aside his judgment on the evidence unless it was clearly erroneous. Maryland Rule 1086.” Harris v. State, 27 Md. App. 547, 552 , 342 A.2d 305, 309 (1975). … WHITE [Appellant’s counsel]: Excuse me, before we get to that, Your Honor, I wonder if we could qualify the witness as being competent, as far as age is concerned?

Juliano v. State

166 Md. App. 531 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 27, 2006

We nevertheless point out that in every case the record should clearly reflect the basis for the amount of restitution ordered. … On review, an appellate court should not reverse the trial court unless that court clearly abused the exercise of its discretion and prejudiced the accused.” Spain v.

King v. State

16 Md. App. 546 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 8, 1973

That a different rationale must exist for establishing the reliability of citizen-informers than for establishing that of the more suspect and anonymous police informer is widely recognized in recent case law. … More often than not, the informant is paid or provides information in exchange for immunity from prosecution for his own misdeeds.

Kantar v. Grand Marques Café

169 Md. App. 275 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 7, 2006

It does not constitute a ruling that there is sufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of accident-related worsening. … That is not surprising, because Koslow was neither qualified nor asked to opine about those issues.

Freeman v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 27, 2023

Our Supreme Court has observed that “[o]n the question of the guilt or innocence 32 of the defendant [such evidence] clearly is hearsay and hence is inadmissible[.]” … App. 331, 348 (1999) (noting that event that occurs in course of investigation does not, ipso facto, establish its relevance); Hall v. State, 119 Md.

Larocca v. Creig Northrop Team, P.C.

217 Md. App. 536 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 25, 2014

After explaining that the covenant clearly prohibited the father from participating in any way in (continued... … Mathews’ conversations with appellants regarding the Bridge Loan Program qualify as advertisements pursuant to the SMLL, but also that the brochures distributed by her company would qualify as well.

Jones v. State

68 Md. App. 162 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 7, 1986

Tyra stated clearly that she believed in God and knew that she should always tell the truth. … Indeed, in some instances this is the only way in which certain qualifying information can be elicited. Often questions that might appear to be simple and direct to an examiner may not be so to a child.

Howard County Citizens for Open Government v. Howard County Board of Elections

201 Md. App. 605 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 27, 2011

Subtitle 6 clearly reflects the legislature’s intention that, in the context of a referendum effort, an election board’s limited resources should be focused on the “large and difficult” task, Doe v. … That percentage shall be applied to the total number of signatures in the petition to establish the number of valid signatures for the petition. (4) (i) If the random sample verification establishes that the total number

Fisher v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

86 Md. App. 322 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 4, 1991

The words “with permission” include the alleged qualifiers urged on us by appellant. The absence of the qualifiers, as we see it, does not expand coverage, nor does it make unambiguous language ambiguous. … Interstate Fire and Casualty Company, 302 Md. 383 , 488 A.2d 486 (1985) in which a few well-established principles were again considered.