Case law

Keystone Masonry Corp. v. Hernandez

156 Md. App. 496 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Apr 19, 2004

He was qualified as an expert on the subjects of family remittances and the economy of El Salvador. Dr. … Notwithstanding the evidence on the question of housing, from which the jury clearly made findings, the issue is without merit.

Bell v. Anne Arundel County

215 Md. App. 161 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Nov 20, 2013

The status of these properties clearly may be affected by the rezoning scheme of the bill.... … 1 far from the site of rezoning actually qualified as specially aggrieved.” Ray, 430 Md. at 86 , 59 A.3d 545 (internal quotation marks omitted).

In the Matter of AutoFlex Fleet Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 20, 2024

disqualified bidder, then AutoFlex might be able to establish that it would be next in line, as the best qualified remaining bidder. 13  On January 8, 2021, the MSBE recounted … Rule 5-201 qualify as “one aspect of law that allows the Court to acknowledge a fact[.]”

Maryland Office of People's Counsel v. Maryland Public Service Commission

226 Md. App. 176 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 15, 2015

To this end, we direct the Company to submit a base rate case petition that aligns with the projected completion date of the qualifying projects, and stipulate that the qualifying projects and GRC revenues are subject to … It clearly explained its rationale for approving the GRC in this case, when it had denied requests for a surcharge in the past.

Johnson v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 9, 2025

“[T]hat instruction was clearly improper under Mullaney v. Wilbur.” Id. … The State focuses on the second blow, which, it argues, does not qualify as a “substantial battery.”

Sanford v. State

87 Md. App. 23 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 1, 1991

Prior to that seizure, there clearly was a valid intrusion into the constitutionally protected area. … S.Ct. 2309 , 110 L.Ed.2d 124 : “[I]f he or she has a valid warrant to search for one item and merely a suspicion concerning the second, whether or not it amounts to probable cause, we fail to see why the suspicion should immunize

Cohen v. Montgomery County Department of Health & Human Services

149 Md. App. 578 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Feb 27, 2003

Although the Montgomery County Code does not expressly say so, it clearly implies that the denial of a reasonable accommodation to an otherwise qualified employee would constitute disability discrimination. … To establish a prima facie case for disability discrimination under the ADA based on an employ *592 er’s failure to provide a reasonable accommodation, the employee must show: (1) that the employer is subject to the statute

Gambino v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Mar 17, 2026

Gambino’s] prior sexual abuse crucial to establishing her good faith basis for reporting.” Although Ms. … Gambino’s motion to dismiss on the grounds of statutory immunity as a separate claim of error, the question of whether Ms.

In re: Adoption of K'amora K.

218 Md. App. 287 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Aug 1, 2014

Spence also related an episode in which Mother called her into a visit and complained about a bruise on K’Amora’s thigh that the social worker explained came from an immunization. … The police then required that a physician investigate, and Child Protective Services ruled out the possibility of any abuse (consistent with K’Amora’s medical records, which showed a recent immunization).

Thomas v. Department of Labor, Licensing, & Regulation

170 Md. App. 650 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 21, 2006

Initially, we recognize that, in order to qualify for federal funding for this State’s unemployment insurance program and for private employer’s in Maryland to be eligible for federal tax credits for unemployment contributions … Maryland Code (2003), § 3-103 of the Education Article (“Educ”) establishes a county board of education for each county of this State and for Baltimore City.

Kairys v. Douglas Stereo Inc.

83 Md. App. 667 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 5, 1990

Maryland has long recognized, for example, that “communications arising out of the employer-employee relationship clearly enjoy a qualified privilege.” McDermott v. Hughley, 317 Md. 12, 28 , 561 A.2d 1038 (1989). … Clearly, then, there was nothing to show a conspiracy on Moore’s part. That leaves only Rosenfeld and Douglas.

Ridgeway v. State

140 Md. App. 49 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 4, 2001

The question is that the Court clearly indicated that it was imposing a separate sentence for the offenses committed against each of these people. … The two shootings, in satisfaction of the first step, clearly fell within the “common plan” or “motive” exceptions to Rule 5-404(b).

Maryland Waste Coalition, Inc. v. Maryland Department of Environment

84 Md. App. 544 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Oct 31, 1990

Although this case was not brought specifically under ESA, the Coalition would qualify as a person because it is an organization doing business in Maryland. … It has also recognized that the establishment of organizations and associations represent the only economically viable means of pursuing this involvement.

Marsh v. State

22 Md. App. 173 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 19, 1974

As to self-incrimination, we said in Savage, supra, at pages 19-20 [711-712]: “ * * * Despite, however, the absence of statutory authority to grant immunity, we think that under our holding, supra, a court has authority under … The rule governing the issue was clearly and succinctly *185 restated in Shapiro, Administrator v.

Cavalier Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Liberty Homes, Inc.

53 Md. App. 379 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jan 5, 1983

The arrangement was clearly not a requirements contract. … This principle has been qualified several times by the Supreme Court. F.T.C. v. Texaco, Inc., 393 U.S. 223 , 89 S.Ct. 429 (1968); Albrecht v. The Herald Co., 390 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 869 (1968); U.S. v.

Livingston v. State

192 Md. App. 553 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 27, 2010

The evidence presented at trial clearly established that Livingston knew the conditions of his quarantine and violated them by leaving his isolation room and entering the anteroom without a mask and by going outside the hospital … The testimony of the nurses — which the trial court clearly credited — established that Livingston acted in an assaultive and threatening manner toward them and that his offensive and disruptive words and actions disturbed

Matter of Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 23, 2024

The Department clearly considered the factors set forth in the United States Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui and its findings and conclusions are supported by the record. … The Department clearly considered nutrient uptake rates in designing the Permit conditions.

Monumental Enterprises, Inc. v. Mayor of Baltimore City

26 Md. App. 24 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · May 2, 1975

By Chapter 540 of the Acts of 1941, (modified in some respects by Chapter 761, Acts of 1943), a new procedure quasi in rem was established, analogous to a mortgage foreclosure. Gathwright v. … Although he concurred in the result for other reasons, Judge (later Chief Judge) Hammond felt constrained to make the following observations at 539 [626]: “The Tax Sales Act of 1943 sought to make tax sales immune from attacks

State v. Lewis

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Dec 5, 2023

Judge Anderson clearly looked upon Darby as a “co-defendant.” … For an admission of guilty involvement to qualify as cognizable proof of guilt, the authorship of the damaging admission needs to be established with particularity.

Montgomery Cablevision Ltd. Partnership v. Beynon

116 Md. App. 363 · Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jul 3, 1997

Appellants contend that the testimony of the accident reconstruction experts established beyond any doubt that .Kirkland’s trailer was clearly visible and that the decedent contributed to the happening of the accident because … Harry Kriemelmeyer, a registered professional engineer, was qualified as an expert in accident reconstruction.