Case law

Goff v. State

387 Md. 327 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 6, 2005

be held to be clearly erroneous.’ ” Solomon v. … The shower insert is clearly a fixture. Under the common law, fixtures are treated as part of the realty.

Smoot v. Rea

19 Md. 398 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 23, 1863

, (even if a verbal authority in such case would suffice,) must be held as revoked or qualified by the terms of the letters themselves. … We are clearly of opinion that he cannot claim to be protected as a bona fide purchaser without notice.

Wright v. Gilbert

51 Md. 146 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 25, 1879

Apart from our Evidence Acts, the witness was clearly incompetent on account of interest. … The appellant’s prayers were based upon the evidence of Wilson Wright, to establish the parol promise, or contract made by the defendant’s testator, and as this evidence was properly excluded, there was no error in rejecting

Wilson v. State

370 Md. 191 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 5, 2002

But more succinctly ‘courts should not subsume the question of qualifying the [scientific] process ... under the question of qualifying the expert.’ People v. Law, 40 Cal.App.3d 69, 75 , 114 Cal.Rptr. 708, 711 (1974). … The evidence relating to Brandi’s death was admitted to establish the corpus delicti of the crime, as well as to establish petitioner as the criminal agent.

Wheeling v. Selene Finance

473 Md. 356 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 30, 2021

Rodriguez, who leased or owned real property for personal purposes, qualify for protection under the MCPA. … Significant to our analysis is the “reasonable inquiry” qualifying language added by amendment to the original language in the first reader.

Killen v. Houser

251 Md. 70 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 9, 1968

But even had such concurrence been obtained, this would still have not relieved the trustee from responsibility because these investments do not qualify and were made by the trustee or accepted and held by the trustee, in … Clearly the asset the trustees received and accepted should have been cash in the amount of $28,000 rather than the promise of an individual to pay $28,000.

Maryland State Fair & Agricultural Society, Inc. v. Supervisor of Assessments

225 Md. 574 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 14, 1961

There was expert testimony tending to establish the many *582 beneficial practical results and the educational value of the overall operation of the Fair. … Two of these traditional entertainment features of the Maryland State Fair, clearly established by the evidence, are the midway and horse racing, and the horse racing has been conducted in good faith as a part of the Fair

State v. Hardy

415 Md. 612 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 27, 2010

Hardy’s statement qualified as a request to discharge his counsel. … Our cases establish clearly that “meaningful trial proceedings” have not begun before voir dire commences (at pre-trial hearings and at a defendant’s first appearance in court on the morning of his or her trial) -and that

Thrift v. Towers

127 Md. 54 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 11, 1915

Towers, was appointed on May the 4th, 1914, a member of the Public Service Commission of Maryland for the term of six years, and on the same day qualified and entered immediately upon the discharge of his duties as such commissioner … The ground of the attack must be plainly and clearly established.

In Re Douglas P.

333 Md. 387 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1994

Neither “person” nor “relative” is qualified by the word “adult.” Moreover, the commonly accepted meaning of both “person” and “relative” is in no way exclusively limited to adults. … Clearly the Legislature believed that child abuse was the basis for a delinquent act when it amended § 3-829.

Cities Service Co. v. Governor

290 Md. 553 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 17, 1981

Most retail mass merchandisers are ineligible under both qualifying dates. … Moreover, the Legislature in 1979 clearly intended to confer a benefit upon the only mass merchandiser which, at that time, was owned by a producer or refiner of petroleum products.

Kidder v. State

475 Md. 113 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 4, 2021

Record Extract at 67-132. 122 excused for cause 176 qualified 207 excused for cause 227 qualified 273 qualified 274 qualified … 278 qualified 279 excused for cause 282 qualified 283 excused for cause 295 qualified 300 qualified 303

Brown v. Bokee

53 Md. 155 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 10, 1880

We shall not stop to inquire whether, under the legislation of Congress establishing the Court of Claims and defining its jurisdiction, a suit could be brought in that Court against the United States for default in payment … The public debt of G-reat Britain is redeemable only at the pleasure of the Government, and holders of that debt can therefore never bring an action against the debtor to recover it, not only because of the immunity of the

United Services Automobile Association v. Riley

393 Md. 55 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 2006

There is clearly enough evidence considering Dr. … This clearly constituted a dispute of material fact. II.

2022 Legislative Districting

481 Md. 507 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 31, 2022

Ripley, 352 Md. 754, 763 (1999) (“An absolute immunity for legislators, with respect to conduct and statements made in the course of legislative proceedings, is as venerable as judicial immunity, having been traced back … for their legislative acts but that a Governor should have only a qualified immunity for his or her legislative function of vetoing or approving legislation.”

Mayor of Baltimore v. Boitnott

356 Md. 605 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 23, 1999

County of Allegheny, Pa., 322 *615 U.S. 174, 64 S.Ct. 908 , 88 L.Ed. 1209 (1944) to be dispositive, the Court held that the government owned property titled in the University’s name was immune from taxation, explaining, “ … Under this section, the holders of certain leasehold interests are treated as owners of the property, even though clearly they are not.

Andrews v. Andrews

242 Md. 143 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 1, 1966

He said he did not think the doctor was qualified to testify as to what Dr. … The actual relationship of the father and sons is clearly relevant in a hypothetical question as to how various factors may be expected to affect that relationship.

Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society v. Goldstein

388 Md. 299 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 9, 2005

September 23, 1999 is ESTABLISHED to be the Absolute Final Bar date in this liquidation proceeding. 4. … It is a four-part definition that places limitations on what qualifies as a “covered claim” pursuant to the statute.

Grimstead v. Brockington

417 Md. 332 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 17, 2010

The juror’s doctor had written to the judge, explaining that, in preparation for the trip to China, the juror was required to get immunization shots the following day. … Maryland Rule 8-401(b) establishes the proper procedure for substitution before the appellate courts: “(b) Substitution. The proper person may be substituted for a party on appeal in accordance with Rule 2-241.”

Carozza v. Peacock Land Corp.

231 Md. 112 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 19, 1963

It is well established that if the question be raised in time, the court will see that no undue advantage is taken of a purchaser at a judicial sale, and he will not be compelled to consummate the sale if it would be inequitable … Without prolonging this opinion further, we think the appellants have clearly shown the materiality of the misrepresentations of the trustee, and that they, in fact, did rely thereon.