Case law

Smoot v. Rea

19 Md. 398 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 23, 1863

, (even if a verbal authority in such case would suffice,) must be held as revoked or qualified by the terms of the letters themselves. … We are clearly of opinion that he cannot claim to be protected as a bona fide purchaser without notice.

Johns v. Fritchey

39 Md. 258 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 21, 1874

Parke, B., says, the modern decisions have qualified the old doctrine that a man shall not be allowed to allege his own lunacy or intoxication, and total drunkenness is now held to be a defence. … The affidavits of Gardiner, Fritchey, Thomas and Mackintosh, who were the only parties besides the appellant, present at the transaction, clearly show he was then fully aware of the nature of the business he was doing, and

Thrift v. Towers

127 Md. 54 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 11, 1915

Towers, was appointed on May the 4th, 1914, a member of the Public Service Commission of Maryland for the term of six years, and on the same day qualified and entered immediately upon the discharge of his duties as such commissioner … The ground of the attack must be plainly and clearly established.

Killen v. Houser

251 Md. 70 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 9, 1968

But even had such concurrence been obtained, this would still have not relieved the trustee from responsibility because these investments do not qualify and were made by the trustee or accepted and held by the trustee, in … Clearly the asset the trustees received and accepted should have been cash in the amount of $28,000 rather than the promise of an individual to pay $28,000.

Wilson v. State

370 Md. 191 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 5, 2002

But more succinctly ‘courts should not subsume the question of qualifying the [scientific] process ... under the question of qualifying the expert.’ People v. Law, 40 Cal.App.3d 69, 75 , 114 Cal.Rptr. 708, 711 (1974). … The evidence relating to Brandi’s death was admitted to establish the corpus delicti of the crime, as well as to establish petitioner as the criminal agent.

Hughes v. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation

241 Md. 471 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 2, 1966

Effective majority rule is, in my opinion, clearly established. Ill, IV and V As we have seen, the State may “legitimately desire to maintain the integrity of various political subdivisions.” … vis a vis a slow *511 growing and older district having proportionately more qualified voters.

Maryland State Fair & Agricultural Society, Inc. v. Supervisor of Assessments

225 Md. 574 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 14, 1961

There was expert testimony tending to establish the many *582 beneficial practical results and the educational value of the overall operation of the Fair. … Two of these traditional entertainment features of the Maryland State Fair, clearly established by the evidence, are the midway and horse racing, and the horse racing has been conducted in good faith as a part of the Fair

Cities Service Co. v. Governor

290 Md. 553 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 17, 1981

Most retail mass merchandisers are ineligible under both qualifying dates. … Moreover, the Legislature in 1979 clearly intended to confer a benefit upon the only mass merchandiser which, at that time, was owned by a producer or refiner of petroleum products.

State v. Hardy

415 Md. 612 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 27, 2010

Hardy’s statement qualified as a request to discharge his counsel. … Our cases establish clearly that “meaningful trial proceedings” have not begun before voir dire commences (at pre-trial hearings and at a defendant’s first appearance in court on the morning of his or her trial) -and that

State v. Roshchin

446 Md. 128 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 26, 2016

Under this provision, MAA clearly has authority to regulate those who provide commercial transportation services at BWI, which is no doubt why it was cited in the notice. 24 See TR 5-408(a)(1) (MAA “may ... … Indeed, the statute has been construed to provide MAA with state action immunity under the federal antitrust laws in connection with its regulation of commercial taxicabs at BWI.

2022 Legislative Districting

481 Md. 507 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 31, 2022

Ripley, 352 Md. 754, 763 (1999) (“An absolute immunity for legislators, with respect to conduct and statements made in the course of legislative proceedings, is as venerable as judicial immunity, having been traced back … for their legislative acts but that a Governor should have only a qualified immunity for his or her legislative function of vetoing or approving legislation.”

Mayor of Baltimore v. Boitnott

356 Md. 605 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Sep 23, 1999

County of Allegheny, Pa., 322 *615 U.S. 174, 64 S.Ct. 908 , 88 L.Ed. 1209 (1944) to be dispositive, the Court held that the government owned property titled in the University’s name was immune from taxation, explaining, “ … Under this section, the holders of certain leasehold interests are treated as owners of the property, even though clearly they are not.

In Re Douglas P.

333 Md. 387 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 13, 1994

Neither “person” nor “relative” is qualified by the word “adult.” Moreover, the commonly accepted meaning of both “person” and “relative” is in no way exclusively limited to adults. … Clearly the Legislature believed that child abuse was the basis for a delinquent act when it amended § 3-829.

Brown v. Bokee

53 Md. 155 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 10, 1880

We shall not stop to inquire whether, under the legislation of Congress establishing the Court of Claims and defining its jurisdiction, a suit could be brought in that Court against the United States for default in payment … The public debt of G-reat Britain is redeemable only at the pleasure of the Government, and holders of that debt can therefore never bring an action against the debtor to recover it, not only because of the immunity of the

United Services Automobile Association v. Riley

393 Md. 55 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 1, 2006

There is clearly enough evidence considering Dr. … This clearly constituted a dispute of material fact. II.

Grimstead v. Brockington

417 Md. 332 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 17, 2010

The juror’s doctor had written to the judge, explaining that, in preparation for the trip to China, the juror was required to get immunization shots the following day. … Maryland Rule 8-401(b) establishes the proper procedure for substitution before the appellate courts: “(b) Substitution. The proper person may be substituted for a party on appeal in accordance with Rule 2-241.”

Andrews v. Andrews

242 Md. 143 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 1, 1966

He said he did not think the doctor was qualified to testify as to what Dr. … The actual relationship of the father and sons is clearly relevant in a hypothetical question as to how various factors may be expected to affect that relationship.

Schade v. Maryland State Board of Elections

401 Md. 1 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 24, 2007

The motion to qualify Dr. Brace, however, was opposed. After a lengthy voir dire examination, the court qualified Dr. Brace as an expert, stating: "I’m going to do this. … ;] "Establish a procedure to effectively evaluate security patches as soon as they are released!

Kidder v. State

475 Md. 113 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 4, 2021

Record Extract at 67-132. 122 excused for cause 176 qualified 207 excused for cause 227 qualified 273 qualified 274 qualified … 278 qualified 279 excused for cause 282 qualified 283 excused for cause 295 qualified 300 qualified 303

Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society v. Goldstein

388 Md. 299 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 9, 2005

September 23, 1999 is ESTABLISHED to be the Absolute Final Bar date in this liquidation proceeding. 4. … It is a four-part definition that places limitations on what qualifies as a “covered claim” pursuant to the statute.