Case law

Bowie Inn, Inc. v. City of Bowie

274 Md. 230 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 24, 1975

In Kuhn , the Court examined the statute and found that the classification had no rational relationship to the protection of the public health, safety or morals since the cosmetologists were qualified to perform the services … The enactment of the deposit ordinance is clearly within this express grant of power set forth in § 2 (14).

Plein v. Department of Labor

369 Md. 421 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 12, 2002

An offer of greater pay by another employer to induce the claimant’s voluntary termination does not qualify; because such offers are conditions of the offered employment and thus only relate to the conditions of the future … This Court also has recognized that “it is sometimes advisable to correct a decision or decisions wrongly made in the first instance if it is found that the decision is clearly wrong and contrary to other established principles

Attorney Grievance v. Miller

467 Md. 176 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 29, 2020

Although the hearing judge did not establish this fact within his findings of fact, he clearly referenced this information in his analysis on mitigation. The hearing judge commented, [Ms. … Additionally, we have previously applied the “general proposition that a violation of Rule 8.1(a) also violates Rule 8.4(c), as a knowingly false statement to Bar Counsel qualifies as at least conduct involving misrepresentation

Alexander v. Worthington

5 Md. 471 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 15, 1853

Dennison, 7 Gill, 157, amongst others will establish this practice. … “The words “after the first day of June next” refer to and qualify the words “executed in due form of law” which they follow, just as in the same section the words “on the day of the death of the testator” refer to and qualify

Board of Education v. Crawford

284 Md. 245 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 5, 1979

Webster in the Dartmouth College case: “By the law of the land is most clearly intended the general law — a law which hears before it condemns; which proceeds upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial. … The meaning is that every citizen shall hold his life, liberty, property, and immunities under the protection of the general rules which govern society.” ’ (Cooley, Const. Lim. 353.)

Land & Simmons Co. v. Arconti

223 Md. 204 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 24, 1960

We think the inference to be drawn from Item 5 is greatly weakened by the fact that in the recitals and in Item 6 there is language clearly indicating that the Company might be required to supplement the insurance by other … The appellants also rely upon Item 8, which fixes the lifetime offer to sell stock “at a price established as directed by this agreement in case of the death of a Stockholder”.

Cumberland & Pennsylnania Railroad v. State

92 Md. 668 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 20, 1901

S. 326 , in no way conflicts with this decision, nor do the views we hold in this case in any way qualify or impair that decision.’" … This it was clearly within the power of the Legislature to provide.

Food Lion, Inc. v. McNeill

393 Md. 715 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 2, 2006

Pursuant to that Rule, the trial court must determine, before admitting expert testimony, that: the witness is qualified, “by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education” to testify as an expert; the matter about … It did observe, however, “The Pre-Trial Order clearly provided that all preliminary motions and motions in limine be filed at least 20 days prior to the trial date.

Montgomery County v. McNeece

311 Md. 194 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 24, 1987

IV, § 22, and an exception, was clearly understood by the Court in Costigan v. … Could the General Assembly thereby provide for absentee voting by voters who are neither “qualified” nor “entitled to vote”?

Director of Patuxent Institution v. DANIELS OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION

243 Md. 16 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 17, 1966

The relationship between the professional staff and the inmate population is generally good. (4) The institution makes continuous efforts to recruit qualified professional personnel of high caliber and does maintain salary … Salary levels for the professional personnel at Patuxent are sufficient to attract and hold qualified personnel.

Baltimore County v. Baltimore County Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 4

439 Md. 547 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 29, 2014

s established negotiable issues. … a petition to stay arbitration pursuant to § 3-208 of this article; (x) Depriving a parent, grandparent, or natural guardian of the care and custody of his child, or changing the terms of such an order; and (xi) Denying immunity

Grandison v. State

305 Md. 685 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 1, 1986

Consequently, the voir dire hypothetical, clearly designated as such, was not reversible error. … Each murder was clearly a separate offense.

McChan v. State

238 Md. 149 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 20, 1966

These prosecutions for armed robbery and other offenses incident thereto arose out of a series of five holdups of liquor dispensing establishments in Baltimore City committed within less *152 than a fortnight at the end of … Moreover, the right of immunity from unreasonable search and seizure is personal and one who disclaims ownership or other possessory interest has no right to protest the legality of a search and seizure. Carter v.

Shirk v. Soper

144 Md. 269 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 6, 1923

Eor reasons already stated we do' not think that either the gpneral rule, or the rule as qualified in Weinstein v. … Erom the act of the court done in the exercise of such a discretion, in the absence of evidence clearly showing :an abuse of it, no appeal lies.

Motor Vehicle Admin v. Geppert

470 Md. 28 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 27, 2020

Geppert had not established that he had satisfied that requirement, he failed to meet the threshold for mandamus relief. … A poorly worded form cannot override the clearly-stated intent of the Legislature.

Gilliam v. State

331 Md. 651 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 25, 1993

That finding was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. … Daneman was assisted by an associate is not clearly erroneous. B. Gilliam argues that the post conviction judge was clearly erroneous in finding that “Mr.

Cox v. Revelle

125 Md. 579 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 8, 1915

It is within the discretion of that department of the 'State government to decide whether the whole or any part of either the natural bars or the barren bottoms shall be open to free or to qualified public use, or shall be … In view of the safeguards thus placed by the statute around the rights and interests of the appellant, there is clearly no impairment of contract to which the constitutional'provision relied upon can he applied.

State of Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Freedom Express

375 Md. 2 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 6, 2003

Art. 2B of the Maryland Code clearly gives the Board the power to render a decision over the class of cases within which the present case falls. … Karasek’s complaints, was clearly not acting “palpably without jurisdiction.”

White v. Friel

210 Md. 274 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 14, 1956

The nature and extent of the Corporation’s business does not appear clearly. … Nor will a course of dealing, even though long continued, necessarily establish such an agency. Twilley v. Bromley, 192 Md. 465 , 64 A. 2d 553 . See also the very recent case of Bukowitz v. Md.

Henley v. Prince George's County

305 Md. 320 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 7, 1986

We have also said that this discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly shown to have been abused, and that this is particularly true where judgment has been entered on the merits rather than as a result of a default. … Noting that the County was immune from liability for its discretionary acts in determining to release the juvenile and in selecting the juvenile’s mother as an appropriate custodian, and finding that there was no duty to