Case law

Chilcoat v. Reid

154 Md. 378 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 12, 1928

In due course they qualified and reported .a sale of the property at a price which left in their hands for distribution $13,388.46. … establish the fact of his renunciation.

Thornton Mellon v. Frederick Cnty. Sheriff

479 Md. 474 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 12, 2022

The procedures established criteria to guide the Town Manager in the validation and verification of signatures on the petition. See id. at 502, 76 A.3d at 1005. … Not directly or clearly expressed; communicated only vaguely or indirectly <counsel’s implied statement>. 2. Recognized by law as existing inferentially <implied agreement>.”

Bottini v. Dept. of Finance, Montgomery Co.

450 Md. 177 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 7, 2016

As with former CP § 12-102(b)(l), CP § 12-202(b) appears to qualify the term “money” to refer to it in the narrowest and most physical sense—as “coin or currency^]” That CP § 12-202(b) qualifies the term “money,” however, … Thus, the relevant legislative history of the forfeiture statute establishes that the term “money” certainly encompasses and applies to the funds contained in a bank account.

Woodland Beach Property Owners' Ass'n v. Worley

253 Md. 442 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · May 8, 1969

post a guard at the improved beaches for the purpose of excluding all persons not having a right to use the community property and also in requiring proof of ownership and payment of the assessment by lot owners otherwise qualified … divorce prayed for a declaration that his wife was guilty of constructive desertion, such a declaration being specifically excluded by § 6 of the Act—that a demurrer would be appropriate, if the lack of a justiciable issue clearly

Beatty's v. Chapline

2 H. & J. 7 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 15, 1806

, according to the nature of tlie injury, and the qualified interest, which he has. … Now the sheriff’ had a qualified interest in the goods; the defendant had a qualified interest also; and these qualified interests together, composed a full and absolute ownership; each party, therefore, had a property in

Erie Insurance v. Chops

322 Md. 79 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 11, 1991

Rather clearly, we think, the trial judge’s determination that Erie failed to notify the MVA of the cancellation of Iser’s insurance within the time required by the statute is supported by the evidence. … See, however, Art. 48A, § 243H(a)(3)(v), expressly excluding subrogated insurers as qualified claimants against the Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund.

Cromwell v. Royal Canadian Insurance

49 Md. 366 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 28, 1878

This is all the testimony the record contains, but it shows very clearly that when this paper left the City of Balti *376 more it was an incomplete., unexecuted instrument, forming and evidencing a'contract with no one ; … Eagle Insurance Company of Cincinnati, 10 Gray, 131 , where the defendant corporation was a company created by the laws of Ohio and established at Cincinnati, but had *377 an agent in Boston, duly authorized to make insurance

Wright v. State

312 Md. 648 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 7, 1988

“That was clearly a misstatement. Everybody understands that as far as the parties to the case are concerned, but that is what you heard. “Because that is what you heard, ... … It is firmly established that an accused has a constitutional right to a fair trial. State v. Babb, 258 Md. 547, 552 , 267 A.2d 190 (1970).

Veney v. Warden

259 Md. 437 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 9, 1970

Mitchell’s testimony is clearly insubstantial. … Indeed, the doctrine of immunity rests upon the belief that, the state may use the promise of withholding criminal prosecution as an inducement to testify against another.

Bradley v. Bradley

119 Md. 645 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Feb 13, 1912

She qualified as such executrix and took possession of his real *647 and personal estate, amounting in value to about one hundred thousand dollars, all of which passed to her under the terms of the alleged will. … What is' meant by the term “probate” and the effect to be given to it is clearly defined and stated in 40 Cyc. page 1223, where it says that the term probate “when properly defined and strictly used, relates to proving and

Attorney Grievance v. Merkle

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 24, 2014

“The rationale behind the clearly erroneous standard is settled. … In the present case, Bar Counsel did not establish that Mr. Merkle and Ms. Coates had a sexual relationship or that Mr. Merkle attempted to establish one.

Wholey v. Roebuck

370 Md. 38 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 19, 2002

That the petitioner was discharged and that the basis for the petitioner’s discharge was his investigation of the store manager and subsequent reporting to his supervisors have been clearly established. … The Arkansas Supreme Court similarly established public policy favoring employee informants in Sterling Drug, Inc. v.

Lehman, Exec. v. Kairys, Exec.

217 Md. 359 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 18, 1958

Edelen, 11 Md. 415, 424 , the Court approved payment to the administratrix for her services “in nursing servants while sick, and furnishing them with necessaries * * * ”, saying that this item was “clearly within the-principles … If the executor had thought that the best interests of the estate required a qualified executive to direct the affairs of the corporation and had utilized the ownership of the stock of the corporation to make that person

Liquor Dealers Credit Control, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury

241 Md. 656 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 9, 1966

lien was the one established for judgments under the existing Maryland law. … established Maryland law.

Aubinoe v. Lewis

250 Md. 645 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Aug 23, 1968

We will not hold that his finding was clearly erroneous. Maryland Rule 886a. The present case is similar in this regard to Chatham Corp. v. … Dutton, Jr., a qualified planning expert, E. J. Dieudonne, Jr., the same real estate expert who testified at the hearings in regard to Application E-177 concerning the 2.7953 parcel, and Burton H.

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Bierman

266 Md. 420 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 11, 1972

Lave is an executive officer of the named insured, Gareis, and qualifies as an insured under the policy issued to Gareis. The case came on for trial in June 1971 before Perrott, J., without a jury. … If the insurer wishes to further exclude its liability, it could clearly so state in its contract and its failure to do so should be strictly construed.

Mercy Medical Center v. Julian

429 Md. 348 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Nov 27, 2012

Clearly, something short of an actual judgment will suffice.” Swigert v. Welk, 213 Md. 613, 619 , 133 A.2d 428 (1957). … We answered in the affirmative; clearly the issue of whether the language of the release established the released hospital’s joint tort-feasor status was not contested.

Feldman v. Granger

255 Md. 288 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Oct 16, 1969

In order to qualify for such treatment it is necessary that within 30 days prior to or after the beginning of a corporation’s fiscal year that a Form 2553 be filed with the Internal Revenue Service. … However, we think that the case at bar clearly comes within the ‘discovery rule’ as established by Hahn, supra, and Waldman, supra.

Hockaday v. Schloer

125 Md. 677 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Apr 21, 1915

Clark, 90 Md. 346 , probably expresses the rule as clearly and .comprehensively as it is anywhere stated, and it is certainly the rule in this State as established by both prior and subsequent decisions. … This rule is qualified when the servant, by reason of tender years, is unable to appreciate or understand those perils from his own observation.

Werber v. Klopfer

260 Md. 486 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jan 20, 1971

S. 254, 270 (1960), and the ancient principle that individuals, regardless of notoriety or renown, should *491 enjoy immunity from false and defamatory attacks. 50 Am.Jur.2d, Libel and Slander § 1. … These are qualified blacks, selected with care, because they are expected to do the work; however, practically all of them are lacking in funds, so we pay them to come to Duke.