Case law

Cedarmere Ventures, LLC v. Cohassett Sewer Commission

21 Mass. L. Rptr. 600 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Aug 22, 2006

Since that time and pursuant to the Judgment, all issues concerning the Town’s sewer system and the sewage treatment plant were to be directed to the Town’s Board of Health (“Board”). … sewer, or if the owner of such land shall make to the board or officer having charge of the maintenance and repair of sewers application to connect his land with a common sewer, such board or officer shall make such connection

Hansberry v. Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n

10 Mass. L. Rptr. 100 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Oct 21, 1998

In Attorney General v. … The Massachusetts Courts have previously determined that meetings of appeal and review boards are subject to the Open Meeting Law, despite their quasi-judicial nature. In Yaro v.

Miranda v. Back Bay Publishing Co.

5 Mass. L. Rptr. 445 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jul 15, 1996

According to Miranda’s complaint, 1 the defendant Board ofTrustees of Back Bay (“the Board”) is the controlling entity of Back Bay and defendant Ed Brennan (“Brennan”) served as president of the Board and editor-in-chief … Certain members of the Board who managed the newspaper were students who received stipends ranging from $100.00 to $1,250.00 at the end of each semester.

Fogg v. Nordberg

4 Mass. L. Rptr. 479 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Oct 3, 1995

Carleton v. Framingham, 418 Mass. 623, 631 (1994). … “When a subject has been fully regulated by statute an administrative board cannot further regulate it by the adoption of a regulation which is repugnant to the statute.” Commonwealth v.

Nascimento v. Harvard Community Health Plan, Inc.

7 Mass. L. Rptr. 284 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Apr 14, 1997

In Harlow v. … E.g., Harvard Community Health Plan, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of Cambridge, 384 Mass. 536, 541 (1981) (construing G.L.c. 59, §5, cl. 3rd, (a)); see New England Legal Foundation v.

Shore v. Hillwinds Family Ltd. Partnership

30 Mass. L. Rptr. 51 · Massachusetts Superior Court · May 4, 2012

Marashlian v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Newburyport, 421 Mass. 719, 721 (1996), citing Circle Lounge & Grill Inc. v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 324 Mass. 427, 430 (1949). … Standerwick v. Board of Appeals of Andover, 447 Mass. 20 (2006).

Pinker v. JSS Corp.

18 Mass. L. Rptr. 199 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Aug 12, 2004

See White v. Peabody Construction Co., Inc., 386 Mass. 121, 131-33 (1982). Plaintiffs’ reliance on Commonwealth v. … See Hannon v. Original Gunite, 385 Mass. at 822 .

Roumeliotis v. Zenga

2 Mass. Supp. 54 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Oct 1, 1980

Charges are initially heard by the Local Union Executive Board, with a right of appeal to the Executive Board of the Joint Council or to the General Executive Board, which is the Executive Board of the International. (1971 … See, e.g., Hamilton v.

George v. Synkinetics, Inc.

31 Mass. L. Rptr. 64 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Mar 20, 2013

Pasqualucci became Chairman of the Board. George retained the titles of CEO and President, but his Board position was reduced to Vice Chairman. Id. ¶11. … See, e.g., Stanton v. Lighthouse Financial Services, Inc., 621 F.Sup.2d 5, 11-13 (D.Mass. 2009) (president); Okerman v. VA Software Corp., 69 Mass.App.Ct. 771, 777-78 (2007) (marketing manager). But see Gabovitch v.

Pederzani v. Guerriere

4 Mass. L. Rptr. 447 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Aug 11, 1995

Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue, 75 N.Y.2d 530, 537-39 (1990); Macrides v. Mannix, Plymouth Superior C.A. 89-01618A: 89-0592, Findings, Rulings and Order (R.L. … The board of trustees “owes its duty of loyalty to the . . . [unit owners] — that is, it must act for the benefit of the residents collectively.” Id. So long as the board acts “for the purposes of the . . .

Wellington Management Co. v. City of Boston

1 Mass. L. Rptr. 150 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Sep 3, 1993

That lapse doomed the application: The time limits are enforced strictly, Guzman v. Board of Assessors of Oxford, 24 Mass.App.Ct. 118, 120 (1987), and cases cited. … Co. v.

Beling v. Radiation Monitoring Devices, Inc.

10 Mass. L. Rptr. 542 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Sep 22, 1999

See Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 7 Mass. 1, 2 (1998); see also Blare, 419 Mass. at 441 . … Brown v. Nutter, McClennen & Fish, 45 Mass.App.Ct. 212, 215 (1998); see also Foley v.

Iodice v. City of Newton

10 Mass. L. Rptr. 716 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Oct 1, 1999

The Board ruled: 1. … Merisme v. Board of Appeal on Motor Vehicle Liab. Policies and Bonds, 27 Mass.App.Ct. 470, 474 (1989).

Doe, SORB No. 137631 v. Holmes

30 Mass. L. Rptr. 341 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jun 4, 2012

Counsel’s letter asserted that “we have determined that the Board issues two different types of responses to queries to the Board. … some indication that the board — it’s the board’s way of letting us know there’s a problem with the candidate.”

LeMay v. Dubois

8 Mass. L. Rptr. 289 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Mar 23, 1998

LeMay presented the Disciplinary Board with a copy of the litigation in the Superior Court concerning the confiscation of property, character letters on his behalf, and a copy of Langton v. … In Heck v.

Hanna v. Shea

1 Mass. L. Rptr. 504 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jan 25, 1994

Hendrickson v. Sears, 365 Mass. 83, 86 (1974). … IV, V, XII and XIII allege other claims flowing from the firm’s and Mr. Brown’s alleged failure to represent plaintiff properly.

Possick v. Willitts

14 Mass. L. Rptr. 535 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Apr 11, 2002

See generally Doherty v. Retirement Board of Medford, 425 Mass. 130, 135 (1997) (applying substantial evidence standard to review of retirement board decision imposing forfeiture of contributions); Konstantopoulos v. … Doherty v. Retirement Board of Medford, 425 Mass. at 135, 141-42 .

Rittenhouse v. Harshbarger

9 Mass. L. Rptr. 123 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Aug 27, 1998

The letter cited to SCIT, Inc. v. Planning Board of Braintree, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 101, 107-08 (1984), as support for the Attorney General’s disapproval of the overlay district amendment. … SCIT Inc. v. Planning Board of Braintree, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 101 (1984); Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Board of Appeals of Westwood, 23 Mass.App.Ct. 278 (1986).

Aiello v. Aiello

11 Mass. L. Rptr. 304 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Jan 19, 2000

Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc., 424 Mass. 501, 517 (1997); Kirley v. Kirley, 25 Mass.App.Ct. 651, 652-54 (1988). … Kirley v. Kirley, 25 Mass.App.Ct. at 655 .

Therrien v. Global Property Developers Corp.

22 Mass. L. Rptr. 424 · Massachusetts Superior Court · Apr 3, 2007

In Broderick v. … In Schlager v. Board of Appeal of Boston, the court clarified that this language in Broderick was applicable to zoning appeals brought pursuant to G.L.c. 40A, §17. 9 Mass.App.Ct. 72 , 76 n.9 (1980).