Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

1,031 results

0.36s

  • Reiman v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1985 Mass. App. Div. 186 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Sep 26, 1985

    Lynch v. Board of Appeals of Boston, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 353, 356 (1973). This view pertains not only to failure to commence appeal in a timely manner in actions at law [see Conway v. … Contributory Retirement Board, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 668, 669 (1984). As was recognized in Schulte v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Moulton v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1981 Mass. App. Div. 8 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jan 7, 1981

    Gentile v. Rent Control Board of Somerville, 365 Mass. 343, 346, fn.3 (1974);Black v. Zuker, 48 Mass. App. Dec. 156, 161-168 (1972). … Sherman v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Testa v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1991 Mass. App. Div. 176 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Nov 7, 1991

    Organization of State Engineers and Scientists v. Labor Relations Commission, 389 Mass. 920 (1963). This is especially so in rent control matters. H.N. Gorin & Leeder Management Co. v. … Rent Control Board of Cambridge, 18 Mass. App. Ct. 272, 276 (1984); Slavin v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, 26 Mass. App. Ct. 985, 986 (1988).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McPherson v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1989 Mass. App. Div. 126 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jun 7, 1989

    I would remand the case for a consideration of whether the precedent established in the case of In the Matter of 244-245 Cypress Street, Docket No. 655 of the Rént Control Board of the Town of Brookline, relieves the Appellees

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1988 Mass. App. Div. 81 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · May 10, 1988

    any civil litigation, including a small claims for unpaid rent, that might arise between the parties to the proceeding before the Board (Compare Rogers v. … We reaffirm Post v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 1984 Mass. App. Div. 251 and Slavin v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 1987 Mass. App.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wood-Dyer v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1983 Mass. App. Div. 50 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Feb 18, 1983

    Rent Control Board of Brookline, 367 Mass. 1, 10 (1975); Moulton v. Brookline Rent Control Board et al. 1981 Mass. App. Dec. 8 , 10. … See Sherman v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, supra note 9, at 7.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Slavin v. Rent Control Board of Brookline

    1987 Mass. App. Div. 168 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Oct 5, 1987

    The Board made numerous findings of fact. … , and may not be uséd by the Board as a basis for denial of an application for a Certificate of Eviction under any of the provisions of section 9(a) (see, Post, Trustee v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Waters & Brown, Inc. v. Boston Better Business Machines Co.

    1984 Mass. App. Div. 159 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1984

    P., Rule 52 (b); Ashapa v. Reed, 280 Mass. 514, 516 (1932); Photiou v. Del Sordo, 1982 Mass. App. Div. 251, 252 . … Rourke v. Cadillac Auto. Co., 268 Mass. 7, 8 (1929). See also Wright v. Heil Equip. Co., 357 Mass. 74, 76 (1970).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Chayet v. Rent Control Board of Brookline

    1988 Mass. App. Div. 48 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Mar 10, 1988

    Obviously, as long as there is substantial evidence to support the determination of the Board, we would not substitute over views of the facts, in any event [Moulton v. … We believe that the Board was warranted in its conclusion. Its interpretation appears to be a reasonable construction of a By-Law with which it is familiar and as to which it has particular expertise [see Kahn v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Volloch v. Rent Control Board of Brookline

    1986 Mass. App. Div. 72 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · May 22, 1986

    Brookline Rent Control Board, 394 Mass. 709 (1985); Entis v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 1985 Mass. App. Div. 202, 205 ; Paula Wood-Dyer v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 1983 Mass. App. Div. 50 . … Decker v. Boston Rent Board, et al, 13 Mass. App. 901, 907 (1982).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Seman v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1996 Mass. App. Div. 49 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Mar 18, 1996

    While the Board has broad authority to promulgate regulations and administer the by-law, Scofield v. … Since the Board did not consider those factors, its decision is not legally justified. Sherman v. Rent Control Board Of Brookline, 367 Mass. 1 (1975).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amherst Associates v. Amherst Housing Review Board

    1989 Mass. App. Div. 51 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Mar 17, 1989

    In another case, Rent Control Board of Cambridge v. … We believe that Zoning Board of Appeals of Wellesley v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ho v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1992 Mass. App. Div. 190 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Sep 29, 1992

    Board of Selectmen of Dartmouth v. Third District Court of Bristol, 359 Mass. 400, 403 (1971); Beverly v. First District Court of Essex, 327 Mass. 56, 61 (1951); Moroni v. Brawders, 317 Mass. 48, 56 (1944); Spiegel v. … Fisgever v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 1983 Mass. App. Div. 357, 359 ; Wallace v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 13, 15-16 (1981).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Galler v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1991 Mass. App. Div. 36 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Mar 6, 1991

    Plaintiff-landlord, dissatisfied with defendant-Brookline Rent Control Board’s decision as to the amount of rent to be charged for her rent controlled *37 apartment units, sought judicial review. … Marlborough Hospital v. Commissioner of Public Welfare, 346 Mass. 737, 738 (1964). Report Dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Waxman v. Amherst Housing Review Board

    1992 Mass. App. Div. 89 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · May 1, 1992

    The decision of the Board was clearly within its purview, and this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact. Sherman v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, supra. … Zussman v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, 371 Mass. 632 (1976); Niles v. Boston Rent Control Administrator, supra. The trial Court concluded that the decision of the Board was legally justified.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rivernider v. Amherst Housing Review Board

    1989 Mass. App. Div. 97 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Apr 27, 1989

    We review a decision concerning the Amherst Housing Review Board (“Board”). … See also, Garnett v. Director of the Division of Employment Security, 394 Mass. 417 (1985) for a discussion of a similar statutory scheme and factual situation.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Berg v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    1982 Mass. App. Div. 100 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Apr 15, 1982

    Burnham v. Board of Appeals of Gloucester, 333 Mass. 114 (1955). … Sherman v. Board of Aldermen of Newton, 361 Mass. 758 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pinkas v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1989 Mass. App. Div. 73 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Apr 5, 1989

    This case would appear to be controlled, in large part, by Health Co., Inc. v. … (See also Post v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 1984 Mass. App. Div. 250 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DePopolo v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1993 Mass. App. Div. 167 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Sep 2, 1993

    The Board’s decisions are reviewed by the court to determine if they are supported by substantial evidence and if they are legally justifiable. Kahn v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 394 Mass. 709, 711 (1985). … Moulton v. Brookline Rent Control Board, 385 Mass. 228, 233 (1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doyle v. Brookline Rent Control Board

    1988 Mass. App. Div. 123 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jul 19, 1988

    At argument, the trial court was informed that the hearing examiner who heard the case at the Board left the Board in late 1985 and that the tape recording of the hearing was no longer available and no transcript of the hearing … Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway, 235 Mass. 482, 502 (1920). Report dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.