Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

1,031 results

0.21s

  • Sutherland v. MacLeod

    2 Mass. App. Dec. 20 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Dec 15, 1941

    The defendant testified that the plaintiff came to live with her in 1937 at $7. per week for room and board, but denied the existence of any agreement that this sum should be credited on the notes. … Taylor v. Foster, 132 Mass. 30 ; Nutter v. Mroezka, 303 Mass. 343 . Report dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hurwitz v. Lakson

    2 Mass. App. Dec. 113 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Apr 7, 1942

    On the subject of written and oral arguments of “From Writ to Rescript,” Little, Brown 6? Co., 1941, said articles by the Chief Justice and by Mr. Dodge and articles by Judge Qua and Mr. Hitchcock. … Kay v. Audet, 306 Mass. 337, 338 , supra. The appeal having been waived the Report is Dismissed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. Chaouche

    2000 Mass. App. Div. 22 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jan 21, 2000

    Altschuler v. Boston Rent Board, 12 Mass. App. Ct. 452, 457-458 (1981). See also Lynch v. *26 James, 44 Mass. App. Ct. 448, 450 (1998); Spaulding v. Young, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 624, 627 (1992). … Auth. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gagne v. Blier

    10 Mass. App. Div. 191 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Sep 13, 1945

    Widiman v. Brown, 47 N. W. (Mich.) 231, 232. … Mills v. Wyman, 3 Pick. 207. But that is not the situation in the case at bar as the expenses here were incurred subsequent to the promise, as we construe the declaration. In Forsythe v. Rexrost, 27 S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cogan v. Cambridge Retirement System

    1 Mass. App. Div. 15 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jan 15, 1936

    Ransom v. … Hey v. Prime, 197 Mass. 474, at 475 ; Fourth National Bank v. Mead, 214 Mass. 549, at 550, 551 ; Eaton v. Eaton, 233 Mass. 351, at 364 ; Paige v. Sinclair, 237 Mass. 482, at 483 ; Lonergan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lucas v. Allen

    1997 Mass. App. Div. 9 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Feb 3, 1997

    Brown v. Perkins, 83 Mass. (1 Allen) 89, 97-98 (1861). … See McGrath v. Sullivan, 303 Mass. 327 , 21 N.E. 2d 533 (1939). Blows to the head and eye were inflicted while a group, including George Allen, was beating Mr. Lucas.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lynch v. Pennsylvania Railroad

    11 Mass. App. Div. 219 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jul 31, 1946

    On November 26, 1944, the plaintiff boarded the Colonial Express in Boston. This train service was operated between Boston and Washington, D. C., by connecting carriers. … Hartan v. Eastern Railroad Co., 114 Mass. 44 . Any responsibility of the defendant must be predicated upon an assumption of same by word or act. The circumstances here differ from those in Najac v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borden v. Deep

    2000 Mass. App. Div. 122 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · May 3, 2000

    Subsequently, the Supreme Judicial Court held in Brown v. … See Swampscott Education Association v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jenks v. Allstate Insurance

    1987 Mass. App. Div. 128 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jun 17, 1987

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 391 Mass. 157, 162 (1984); Commonwealth v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket S.S. Authy., 352 Mass. 617, 618 (1967). … Pea body v. Campbell, 281} Mass. 295, 801, (1934).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Macone Bros. v. Strauss

    1997 Mass. App. Div. 95 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jun 20, 1997

    Starr v. Fordham, 420 Mass. 178, 186 (1995); Williams v. Resolution GGF OY, 417 Mass. 377, 381 (1994); Kendall v. Selvaggio, 413 Mass. 619, 620-621 (1992); Lundgren v. Gray, 414 Mass. App. Ct. 451 , 456-457 (1996). … See also, Ashapa v. Reed, 280 Mass. 514, 516 (1932); Frontiero v. Brown, 1996 Mass. App. Div. 82, 83 . Nor, as noted, did the defendants file proper requests for rulings of law.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Jablonski v. Casey

    2003 Mass. App. Div. 203 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Dec 17, 2003

    Randolph’s Board of Health conducted an inspection of the premises on September 8, documenting several of Casey’s complaints. … Spiegel v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Handman v. Spector

    1996 Mass. App. Div. 185 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Nov 8, 1996

    I shall request the Board of Bar Overseers to investigate the conduct of Attorney Spector during the course of this trial. … See generally Hahn v. Planning Board of Stoughton, 403 Mass. 332, 337-338 (1988); Strand v. Hubbard, 27 Mass. App. Ct. 684, 685 (1989).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Maloney v. Maloney

    2004 Mass. App. Div. 189 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Dec 3, 2004

    Kubik v. Streule, supra at 177 , quoting Mazzoleni v. Cotton, 33 Mass. App. … Brown v. Quinn, 406 Mass. 641, 643 (1990). Nor does it matter that the defendant had actual notice. Commissioner of Revenue v. Corrigan, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 309, 316 (1998).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Gillespie v. Steiger

    1998 Mass. App. Div. 264 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Dec 11, 1998

    (See Brown v. Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority, 614 F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Finkelstein v. Hayden

    59 Mass. App. Dec. 145 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Dec 1, 1976

    Kimball Co. v. Medford, 340 Mass. page 727, 728-729 *149 (1960). Quintin Vesper Co., Inc. v. Construction Service Co., 343 Mass. 547, 551-552 (1962). Spitz v. Spitz, 31 Mass. Appellate Decision 124 (1965). … of Officers of the Commonwealth or of a County, City, Town or District, and such order states that Betterments are to be assessed for the improvement, such Board shall within six months after the completion of the improvement

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Goldrick v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

    15 Mass. App. Div. 95 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jun 15, 1950

    In Putnam v. … That decision is authority for the legal proposition that application to the National Labor Relations Board is the plaintiff’s primary and exclusive remedy.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Forbes v. Framingham Union Hospital, Inc.

    1989 Mass. App. Div. 83 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Apr 26, 1989

    Sanderson, 372 Mass. 157, 160-161 (1977); Marlow v. New Bedford, 369 Mass. 501, 508 (1976); DiGiovani v. Board of Appeals of Rockport, 19 Mass. App. Ct. 339, 343 (1986). … Malone v. Walsh, 315 Mass. 484, 490 (1944); DiGiovanni v. Board of Appeals of Rockport, supra at 343; National Medical Care, Inc. v. Zigelbaum, 18 Mass. App. Ct. 570, 575 (1984).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Donaher v. Porcaro

    1996 Mass. App. Div. 173 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Oct 18, 1996

    See: Brown v. Jacob, 439 Mich. 865 , reversing 183 Mich. App. 387 (1990); All American Pool Inc. v. Lato, 20 Conn. 625 (1990). There was no prejudicial error committed and we order that the appeal be dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • DiGregorio v. Commonwealth

    1990 Mass. App. Div. 180 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Oct 24, 1990

    Cardelliccho v. Board of Retirement of Natick, 391 Mass. 760, 763 (1978); Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing Comm., 324 Mass. 309, 312 (1949). … Board of Regis, in Embalming & Funeral Direc., 379 Mass. 368, 375 (1979). Upon the facts in this case, see also Landrum v. Commonwealth, 1981 Mass. App.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoyt v. Sweeney

    5 Mass. App. Div. 359 · Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · Jul 22, 1940

    In his answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories, read at the trial, the defendant stated that one Brown had closed the main water valve and had drawn the water from the boiler on December 31st. … Williams, supra; Bennett v. Nesson, 244 Mass. 299 ; Moskow vs. Robinson, 276 Mass. 16 ; Ames vs. Beal, 284 Mass. 56 . Such was the situation in the instant case. What then are the liabilities of a tenant at will?

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.