Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmassappct

786 results

0.78s

  • Crown v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.

    85 Mass. App. Ct. 214 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 24, 2014

    The judge clearly instructed the jury that actual knowledge was required. … In Marram /, 442 Mass, at 55, the court specifically rejected the defendants’ argument they were “immune from the plaintiff’s claims because . . .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Onex Communications Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue

    74 Mass. App. Ct. 643 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jul 13, 2009

    Provided these latter, clearly manufacturing activities are substantial, the corporation will be entitled to classification as a manufacturing corpora *647 tion, and its R&D purchases, despite their irrelevance to the corporation … qualify, and (2) what constitutes “receipts” in this context.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • King v. Shank

    92 Mass. App. Ct. 837 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Mar 2, 2018

    The object of election laws is to secure the rights of duly qualified voters, and not to defeat them.' … First, the act provides the elected official with a four-month period of immunity from recall to allow the official to become established in the position. St. 1995, c. 27, § 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Brown

    83 Mass. App. Ct. 772 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 20, 2013

    Ibid, (results of an HGN field sobriety test are not admissible without testimony from a qualified expert). … Ct. 901, 904 (2008) (“The State action requirement of art. 12 is well established. It is governmental, not private, compulsion that is prohibited”).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Falmouth Hospital v. Commissioner of Public Welfare

    23 Mass. App. Ct. 545 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 25, 1987

    the hospital’s claim on the ground that Taft was ineligible for assistance: she had resources in excess of $2,000 — a bank account of $4,295.69 — and, according to the department, she must “spend down” before she could qualify … Referring to the general proposition that the Commonwealth may dictate the terms on which it chooses to forgo its sovereign immunity, see C & M Constr. Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lee v. Board of Appeals of Harwich

    11 Mass. App. Ct. 148 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 12, 1981

    L. c. 40A, § 5A (as amended and in effect in 1972), requiring that when adjacent undersized lots are owned in common such lots must be combined, the three lots on the plan may not have qualified as separate lots in 1966, … The purpose of this conveyancing maneuver is to retain for all lots in a subdivision certain immunities against future zoning changes and mandated changes in the subdivision plan (see, for example, G.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Tosi v. Boston Rent Control Board

    13 Mass. App. Ct. 921 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 1, 1982

    In addition, the landlord was not able to establish that the six units and the building were substantially as good as new after rehabilitation. … The judge’s findings are supported by the evidence, and thus cannot be deemed clearly erroneous.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mauri v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    83 Mass. App. Ct. 336 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 22, 2013

    LLC), clearly establishes that abutters raising unrefuted issues related to overcrowding have standing to challenge further construction in an already overly dense zoning district. See Dwyer v. Gallo, 73 Mass. App. … Although espoused in terms of privacy concerns, the deposition testimony of Maureen Mauri clearly indicates that she is aggrieved by construction of a dwelling which she contends violates the density provisions of the zoning

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Rezendes

    88 Mass. App. Ct. 369 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Sep 17, 2015

    5 qualify as a predicate offense to support a conviction as an armed career criminal under G. … qualify as both a dangerous and a deadly weapon.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Feeley v. Baer

    41 Mass. App. Ct. 239 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Sep 3, 1996

    “So clearly, the risk to the mother is very small with induction of labor, and clearly the risk of waiting is one of infection.” … physician or, in the case of a specialty, by the average qualified physician practicing that specialty.”

    Reversed on other grounds by Feeley v. Baer, 424 Mass. 875 (1997)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schwalm v. Schwalm

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jul 7, 2023

    Because the MUTC was effective six years before the trust was established, we assume William was aware of the relevant aspects of the MUTC as it related to the trustee's obligations to the trust beneficiaries. … Here, we conclude, and the parties agree, that the children are not qualified beneficiaries, and they will not be so qualified until Karen's death.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bruno v. Board of Appeals

    62 Mass. App. Ct. 527 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Nov 29, 2004

    Ct. at 59 , where this court stated that “the by-law, by utilizing separate chapters, clearly differentiates between processing of applications for site plan review and applications for special permits.” … that immunity and the fact that the “noncompliance [was] not highly significant.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Cruz v. Commonwealth

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 7, 2023

    To do so, "the Commonwealth has granted a limited waiver of its sovereign immunity under the erroneous convictions statute to that class of claimants who establish that they are eligible for relief." … Indeed, it says, clearly mistakenly, Cruz's "overturned convictions are not probative of his actual innocence." Ante at . And the court majority goes further.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosati v. Boston Pipe Covering, Inc.

    47 Mass. App. Ct. 121 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 14, 1999

    L. c. 149, § 27, is certainly a suit “between two [or more] persons which clearly sets forth a controversy concerning property.” Id. at 223. … In Whalen , the court concluded that the erroneous denial of a jury trial was not prejudicial because the record clearly established that the plaintiff was not a “qualified handicapped person” who could bring a cause of action

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jarry v. Corsaro

    40 Mass. App. Ct. 601 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jun 26, 1996

    Although the standards of care for general practitioners and specialists have been clearly established under Massachusetts law, Brune v. … Anti: “Judge, you are going to clearly indicate to the jury each separate defendant.”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Hollup v. Worcester Retirement Board

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · Aug 25, 2023

    The DALA magistrate concluded that Hollup had met his burden of proving that he qualified for accidental disability retirement benefits as a result of the September 14, 2004, head injury. … The factual findings made by a DALA administrative magistrate are not immune from review and even reversal by CRAB.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Dube

    59 Mass. App. Ct. 476 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Oct 3, 2003

    Ct. 234 (1973) (as an intermediate appellate court, Appeals Court does not alter established rules of law); Gerber v. Worcester, 1 Mass. App. … But while the case is pending here, candor toward this tribunal requires frank recognition of clearly settled limitations on judicial power, not advocacy of unprincipled and essentially lawless results.

    Cited 48 timesPublished
  • Cornwall v. Forger

    27 Mass. App. Ct. 336 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · May 22, 1989

    Perhaps it would be salutary if, after a certain time, a chain of title based on a recorded deed were immune to collateral attack. … Revision of established law concerning periods of limitation is, however, a task properly within the province of the Legislature. 6 The Land Court judge rightly decided that the plaintiffs had not established an ownership

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Commissioner of Correction

    36 Mass. App. Ct. 114 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 28, 1994

    A claim meets the test unless “it is obviously without merit or ... its unsoundness so clearly results from the previous decisions of [the Supreme Court] as to foreclose the subject and leave no room for the inference that … Prisoners have a “liberty interest” in “uncensored communication by letter . . . even though qualified of necessity by the circumstances of imprisonment.” Champagne v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Foley v. Foley

    27 Mass. App. Ct. 221 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 25, 1989

    Therefore we are unable to assess whether the judge’s findings of fact [as to counsel fees] are clearly erroneous.” Connolly v. Connolly, 400 Mass. 1002, 1003 (1987). 4. … trial, had been qualified in the Plymouth County Probate Court to appraise a retail rug business.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.