Case law

Sherman v. Rent Control Board of Brookline

367 Mass. 1 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 12, 1975

Co. v. … School Comm. of Boston v. Board of Educ. 363 Mass. 125, 129 (1973).

Atherton v. Board of Appeals of Bourne

334 Mass. 451 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 20, 1956

Some of them have been set forth in Blackman v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, ante, 446. Other cases bearing on the subject are Real Properties, Inc. v. … Blackman v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, ante, 446.

Finkelstein v. Board of Registration in Optometry

370 Mass. 476 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 11, 1976

Co. v. Commissioner of Ins., 360 Mass. 667, 674-675 (1971); Cleary v. Cardullo’s, Inc., 347 Mass. 337, 343-344 (1964). … The board in any event lacks the authority to regulate the activities of opticians. Kelley v. Board of Registration in Optometry, 351 Mass. 187, 192 (1966). Silverman v.

Golden v. Board of Selectmen of Falmouth

358 Mass. 519 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 30, 1970

In Crawford v. … See Brady v. Board of Appeals of Westport, 348 Mass. 515 . If a local board acting under the zoning by-law authorizes a project in violation of G.

Colabufalo v. Board of Appeal of Newton

336 Mass. 213 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 20, 1957

Donovan Drug Corp. v. Board of Appeals of Hingham, ante, 1, 4. Burnham v. Board of Appeals of Gloucester, 333 Mass. 114 . Lawrence v. Board of Appeals of Lynn, ante, 87, 89. … See Planning Board of Reading v. Board of Appeals of Reading, 333 Mass. 657 ; LaMontagne v. Kenney, 288 Mass. 363 .

Caputo v. Board of Appeals of Somerville

330 Mass. 107 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 2, 1953

We note that the planning board in its report characterized the proposed amendment as “a spot zone change.” See Leahy v. Inspector of Buildings of New Bedford, 308 Mass. 128 ; Whittemore v. … Building Inspector of Falmouth, 313 Mass. 248 ; Smith v. Board of Appeals of Salem, 313 Mass. 622 . This we cannot determine on this record. In order to do justice further facts should be found. See Watkins v.

Opie v. Board of Appeals of Groton

349 Mass. 730 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 7, 1965

See Cohen v. Board of Registration in Pharmacy, 347 Mass. 96, 98-99 . The filing of a copy of the bill with the town clerk was also a requirement of a valid appeal. See Lincoln v. … Board of Appeals of Fram-ingham, 346 Mass. 418, 420 ; Carey v. Planning Bd. of Revere, 335 Mass. 740, 745 . The plea does not aver that this requirement was omitted.

Halko v. Board of Appeals of Billerica

349 Mass. 465 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 1, 1965

Del Grosso v. Board of Appeal of Revere, 330 *468 Mass. 29, 32. Lincoln v. Board of Appeals of Framingham, 346 Mass. 418 . … Kairis v. Board of Appeal of Cambridge, 337 Mass. 528, 531 . Cary v. Board of Appeals of Worcester, 340 Mass. 748, 753 . Chater v. Board of Appeals of Milton 348 Mass. 237, 246 . ’

Flynn v. Board of Registration in Optometry

320 Mass. 29 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 29, 1946

Milk Control Board v. Gosselin’s Dairy, Inc. 301 Mass. 174, 179-180 . Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 302 Mass. 495, 501 , and cases cited. … The constitutionality of proceedings to revoke certificates of registration under §§ 61-64 was challenged and upheld in Lawrence v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 239 Mass. 424 , and Davis v.

Langlitz v. Board of Registration of Chiropractors

396 Mass. 374 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 11, 1985

LaPointe v. License Bd. of Worcester, 389 Mass. 454, 458 (1983). Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in Medicine, 378 Mass. 519 , 522 n.5 (1979). See *377 Konstantopoulos v. Whately, 384 Mass. 123, 135 (1981); G. … See Arthurs v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 383 Mass. 299, 304 (1981); Maddocks v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 369 Mass. 488, 495 (1976).

Friedman v. Board of Registration in Medicine

414 Mass. 663 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 31, 1993

Friedman v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 408 Mass. 474, 479 (1990). On January 13, 1991, he petitioned the board for reinstatement. … L. c. 30A, § 14 (1); Harper v. Division of Water Pollution Control, supra at 467 ; Board of Appeals of Rockport v. De-Carolis, 32 Mass. App. Ct. 348, 352 (1992).

Board of Registration in Medicine v. Doe

457 Mass. 738 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 2, 2010

See Commonwealth v. Dwyer, 448 Mass. 122, 143 (2006). … The board argues that Commonwealth v.

Langan v. Board of Registration in Medicine

477 Mass. 1023 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 13, 2017

Indeck v. Clients' Sec. Bd., 450 Mass. 379, 385 (2008), quoting School Comm. of Hudson v. Board of Educ., 448 Mass. 565, 575-576 (2007). … Sugarman v. Board of Registration in Med., 422 Mass. 338, 342 (1996), citing Kvitka v.

Shacka v. Board of Appeals of Chelmsford

341 Mass. 593 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 3, 1961

Planning Bd. of Springfield v. Board of Appeals of Springfield, 338 Mass. 160, 165-166 . Cary v. Board of Appeals of Worcester, 340 Mass. 748, 750 . … Atherton v. Board of Appeals of Bourne, 334 Mass. 451, 454 .

Wei Jia v. Board of Bar Examiners

427 Mass. 777 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 9, 1998

See Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 410 Mass. 117, 120 (1991). … See also Novak v.

Smith v. Board of Appeals of Plymouth

340 Mass. 230 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 6, 1960

The plaintiffs, as owners of nearby land, are persons aggrieved, Vainas v. Board of Appeals of Lynn, 337 Mass. 591, 594 , and the bill asserts that they have appealed from the board’s decision of February 18, 1959. … See Gladstone v. Treasurer & Receiver Gen. 337 Mass. 48 . We do not intimate that patent error in giving notice would support the prayers against the board of appeals.

Cohen v. Board of Registration in Pharmacy

347 Mass. 96 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 28, 1964

L. c. 151A, § 42, as amended through St. 1947, c. 434, 4 which then provided in relevant part that every party before the board “shall be made a party respondent.”) The statute involved in Carey v. … In Weiner v. Director of the Div. of Employment Security, 327 Mass. 360 , 363, and Bogdanowicz v.

Greater Boston Real Estate Board v. Board of Registration of Real Estate Brokers & Salesmen

405 Mass. 360 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 11, 1989

Simon v. State Examiners of Electricians, 395 Mass. 238, 242 (1985), quoting Commonwealth v. Lightfoot, 391 Mass. 718, 720 (1984). … In light of its enabling statute, the board correctly notes that the issue is whether the powers granted by the Legislature to the board, taken as an organic whole, authorize the board’s regulation. See Commonwealth v.

Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Board of Appeal

268 Mass. 416 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 10, 1929

It was held in Bemis v. … It follows that there is vital error of law disclosed on the records of the respondent board and that they must be quashed. Bradley v. Zoning Adjustment Board of Boston, 255 Mass. 160, 174 . Prusik v.

Weld v. Board of Appeals of Gloucester

345 Mass. 376 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 4, 1963

15 of c. 40A gives the board of appeals power “2. … The words must also refer to the board, for otherwise the board would be delegating its function.