Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmass

10,000+ results

1.34s

  • Callahan v. Board of Bar Overseers

    417 Mass. 516 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 12, 1994

    An individual who files a complaint with the board does not have standing to appeal from the board’s decision to dismiss that complaint. Binns v. Board of Bar Overseers, 369 Mass. 975, 976 (1976). See Slotnick v. … See Avery v. Steele, 414 Mass. 450 , 451-453 n.2, 455-457 (1993), and cases cited; Price v. Cole, 31 Mass. App. Ct. 1, 6-7 (1991).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

    332 Mass. 625 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 3, 1955

    That board (hereinafter called the appeal board) affirmed the decision of the local board. The petitioner then brought this petition for certiorari upon which judgment was entered dismissing his petition. … Such certification, it is true, is not binding on the local board (Cassier v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Hallett v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

    431 Mass. 66 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 16, 2000

    First Nat’l Bank v. Judge Baker Guidance Ctr., 13 Mass. App. Ct. 144, 153 (1982). See Murphy v. Department of Correction, 429 Mass. 736, 744 (1999); Beeler v. Downey, supra at 616 ; Boylston Water Dist. v. … In Coco v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Board of Assessors

    350 Mass. 629 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 28, 1966

    This is an appeal from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board upholding the denial by the appellee board of assessors of Wenham (assessors) of an application for the abatement of real estate taxes for 1960. … The case was heard in the Appellate Tax Board on an “Agreed Statement of Facts.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Assessors v. Dennehey

    357 Mass. 243 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 9, 1970

    L. c. 58A, § 7A, where the party appealing from the board’s decision is the appellant before the board, or where the assessed valuation of the property concerned exceeds $20,000 and the appellee before the board does not … Wooley v. Fall River, 220 Mass. 584, 589 . Menici v. Orton Crane & Shovel Co. 285 Mass. 499, 503-504 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Medeiros v. Board of Aldermen

    350 Mass. 767 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 7, 1966

    This notice was not given and thus the action of the respondent board in granting the special permit was invalid. … Howe v. Attorney Gen. 325 Mass. 268, 270 , and eases cited.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Woods v. State Board of Parole

    351 Mass. 556 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 5, 1967

    See Gildea v. Commissioner of Correction, 336 Mass. 48, 51 (erroneous computation of good behavior deduction); Brown v. … Even by a writ of mandamus, the board may be required merely to consider a prisoner’s petition for parole. The board may not be required to exercise any discretion for the benefit of a prisoner. See Weinstein v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Zoning Board of Appeals

    429 Mass. 551 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 6, 1999

    L. c. 40B, § 21. 3 The defendant zoning board of appeals of Gloucester (board) scheduled a public hearing on the authority’s application. … Boston, 330 Mass. 381, 384 (1953), citing Circle Lounge & Grill, Inc. v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 324 Mass. 427, 431 (1949), and as such, encourages local authorities to adopt zoning regulations.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Carye v. Board of Assessors

    394 Mass. 1001 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 7, 1985

    As long as actual rents adequately reflect earning capacity, the board’s use of actual rents is an acceptable method of valuation. See, e.g., Fox Ridge Assocs. v. … Co. v. Assessors of Gardner, 377 Mass. 351 (1979). See also Assessors of Quincy v. Boston Consol. Gas Co., 309 Mass. 60, 64 (1941).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clarke v. Board of Collegiate Authority

    327 Mass. 279 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 3, 1951

    Newcomb v. Board of Aldermen of Holyoke, 271 Mass. 565, 567 , and cases cited. Scannell v. State Ballot Law Commission, 324 Mass. 494, 502-503 . … Boott Mills v. Board of Conciliation & Arbitration, 311 Mass. 223, 227 . Burns v. Thomas Cook & Sons, Inc. 317 Mass. 398, 402 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • McCabe v. Board of Assessors

    402 Mass. 728 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 6, 1988

    “A decision of the board will only be disturbed if it was not supported by ‘substantial evidence,’ or was tainted by an error of law. ” Tenneco Inc. v. … We note, however, that the board took a view of the subject property and of the comparable properties. Whether the other properties were “comparable” was within the board’s sound discretion. See Alstores Realty Corp. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Welch v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

    343 Mass. 502 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 26, 1962

    In Williams v. … Regan v. Commissioner of Ins., ante, 202, 205-206. Cf. also Davis v. School C o mm .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • O'Connor v. Boston Retirement Board

    304 Mass. 471 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 29, 1939

    Inc. v. Commonwealth, 293 Mass. 174, 179-181 . … Sturtevant v. Robinson, 18 Pick. 175 , 179. Eaton v. Hall, 5 Met. 287 . Commonwealth v. Roark, 8 Cush. 210 , 212, 213. Dailey v. Coleman, 122 Mass. 64, 67 . Wig-more, Evidence (2d ed.) § 2107.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Osakwe v. Board of Bar Examiners

    448 Mass. 85 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 22, 2006

    Wei *89 Jia v. Board of Bar Examiners, 427 Mass. 777, 782 (1998) (Wei Jia), citing G. L. c. 221, § 37 (petition for examination for admission as attorney), and SJ.C. Rule 3:01. … See, e.g., Matter of Tocci, 413 Mass. 542, 546 (1992) (Tocci) (court has equitable power to waive requirements for admission); Novak v. Board of Bar Examiners, 397 Mass. 270, 274 (1986) (Novak) (waiving S.J.C.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • LaPointe v. License Board of Worcester

    389 Mass. 454 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 14, 1983

    LaPointe also argues that the decision of the board rested on inadmissible hearsay. The mere admission of hearsay before an administrative board is not a denial of procedural due process. See Moran v. … It is enough that the board exercise its discretion fairly and not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner. Id. Cf. Arnett v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Shawmut Mills v. Board of Assessors

    271 Mass. 358 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 27, 1930

    Dalton v. Hinsdale, 6 Mass. 501 . Oakham v. Sutton, 13 Met. 192 , 197. Greene v. Taunton, 1 Greenl. 228. Gorham v. Calais, 4 Greenl. 475. … Taber Mill v. Board of Assessors of New Bedford, 261 Mass. 432 . Exceptions overruled.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Gorovitz v. Planning Board of Nantucket

    394 Mass. 246 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 12, 1985

    See Brown & Brown, Disqualification of the Testifying Advocate — a Firm Rule?, 57 N.C. L. … See Borman v. Borman, supra at 787-788 . See also Serody v. Serody, 19 Mass. App.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Olson v. Zoning Board of Appeal

    324 Mass. 57 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 8, 1949

    See Sanborn v. Rice, 129 Mass. 387 ; Bagnall v. Davies, 140 Mass. 76 ; Payson v. Burnham, 141 Mass. 547 ; Loud v. Pendergast, 206 Mass. 122 . The decision in H. W. Robinson Carpet Co. v. … See Lambert v. Board of Appeals of Lowell, 295 Mass. 224, 228 . As so modified the decree is affirmed with costs. So ordered.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Baruffaldi v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board

    337 Mass. 495 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 7, 1958

    In Hough v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Board, 309 Mass. 534 , a town clerk sought retirement under G. L. c. 32, § 31, as appearing in St. 1936, c. 318, § 1, by reason of total and permanent incapacity. … Milk Control Board v. Gosselin’s Dairy, Inc. 301 Mass. 174, 179-180 . Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. Commonwealth, 302 Mass. 495, 501 . Flynn v. Board of Registration in Optometry, 320 Mass. 29, 31-32 .

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Cross v. Planning Board of Chelmsford

    345 Mass. 618 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 28, 1963

    These propositions were succinctly discussed in Smith v. Board of Appeals of Fall River, 319 Mass. 341, 344 . … See O’Connell v. Board of Appeals of Brockton, 344 Mass. 208, 212 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.