Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,873 results
1.30s
376 Mass. 80 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 24, 1978
He further found that "[t]he alleged assignment of errors is patently frivolous and the identification and guilt of the defendant [were] clearly established beyond a reasonable doubt and a furnishing *82 of a full transcript … cases and in witness immunity contempt proceedings brought under G.
Cited 5 timesPublished71 Mass. 185 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1855
The statute as clearly makes it the duty of the jury to adhere to established principles of law in the one case as in the other. Neither judges nor jury can substitute their discretion for the rules of law. … I think it very clearly has not.
Cited 9 timesPublished152 Mass. 136 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 4, 1890
Nor can exceptions to their rulings be established by parol evidence. … The commissioners were selected by the court as qualified to make a just and equal partition of the land, and were appointed for that purpose.
Cited 5 timesPublishedDigital Equipment Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue
408 Mass. 18 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 12, 1990
General Laws c. 63, § 38F, as amended, clearly preserves against challenge those deductions attributable to such employees. … Therefore, when the Legislature enacted the grandfather clause, it was establishing a new category of employees who were eligible for the deduction.
Cited 0 timesPublished400 Mass. 408 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 9, 1987
Ct. 211, 213 (1983), “we stress[ed] that abrogation of governmental immunity need not necessarily mean that governmental entities would be liable for all harm which results from the conduct of their activities.” … It also includes determinations made by executives or administrators in establishing plans, specifications or schedules of operations. Where there is room for policy judgment and decision there is discretion.
Cited 17 timesPublished462 Mass. 324 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 29, 2012
Collins, 386 Mass. 1, 8 (1982) (“Evidence tending to impeach the credibility of a key prosecution witness is clearly exculpatory”). … A translator need not be a “certified interpreter” or “qualified interpreter" as defined in G. L. c. 221C, § 1, to qualify as an expert.
Cited 11 timesPublishedSave the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public Utilities
366 Mass. 667 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 27, 1975
C. §§ 717 -717w (1970), and does not per se qualify under G. … L. c. 25, § 5, is not crucial since petitioner Pereira clearly has standing to bring this appeal.
Cited 77 timesPublishedAdomaitis v. Director of Division of Employment Security
334 Mass. 520 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 7, 1956
prior to the amendment of the act by St. 1937, c. 421, § 1 (§ 19 [a], as inserted by St. 1935, c. 479, § 5 — “ . . . unemployment is directly due to a strike, lockout or other trade dispute still in active progress in the establishment … the percentage of curtailment of business activity which is necessary ...” and “no cases have reached the point to which the respondent desires to stretch the rule in the instant case where only 2bi% of the employees were qualified
Cited 11 timesPublished97 Mass. 246 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1867
the sequestration and distribution of the debtor’s property, or for granting him a discharge, could be instituted until the 1st of June 1867; for by the express terms of the proviso at the end of the last section, which qualifies … from the time of its passage, the use, in this section, of words in the future tense — “shall go into operation” — is inconsistent with the hypothesis that the statute goes into operation presently upon its passage, and clearly
Cited 11 timesPublished453 Mass. 377 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 16, 2009
The First Amendment does not grant religious organizations absolute immunity from tort liability. … The evidence was clearly to the contrary, as we now describe.
Cited 36 timesPublished373 Mass. 700 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 18, 1977
“Such proof of authenticity usually takes the form of testimony of a qualified witness either (1) that the thing is what its proponent represents it to be, or (2) that circumstances exist which imply that the thing is what … Clearly, however, Officer Bickerton could have had no first hand knowledge of the presence of a woman at the scene prior to his arrival, and the judge *707 might have excluded the question on this ground.
Cited 94 timesPublishedFoxboro Associates v. Board of Assessors
385 Mass. 679 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 1, 1982
The evidence clearly supports the board’s finding that the witness was qualified as an expert on reproduction costs. … Instead, the board found overvaluation established and adopted the valuation method suggested by the assessors.
Cited 27 timesPublished462 Mass. 511 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 15, 2012
As a procedural directive that provides a means of referring matters to the council, rule 40A clearly falls within the *516 scope of the rulemaking authority that the city charter vests in the council. … Nevertheless, the other provisions and structure of the statute indicate clearly that such “action” is distinguishable from criminal prosecution, see, e.g., G.
Cited 2 timesPublished398 Mass. 18 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 10, 1986
The evidence included testimony by an attorney who was qualified as an expert in eminent domain cases, that he had tried many cases against the plaintiff, that the plaintiff was “an outstanding trial lawyer . . . perhaps … This finding was not clearly erroneous. It is supported by supplementary findings concerning the method used to establish a reasonable probability of rezoning to a commercial use. See Roach v.
Cited 50 timesPublishedFirst Baptist Church of Sharon v. Harper
191 Mass. 196 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 6, 1906
The effect of these enactments is that for the purpose of taking, holding and transmitting property a voluntary religious society possessed all the qualifying attributes of a duly organized corporation. Fisher v. … An examination of this instrument clearly shows that in terms it does not purport to be the grant of the Baptist Church of Sharon, acting by its trustees duly authorized to convey, but is in recitals, covenants, execution
Cited 27 timesPublishedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 17, 2024
And, while the Legislature clearly was aware of and considered the pendency of a § 24 proceeding affecting a nonmarital child, including presumably the power of the Juvenile Court judge to award "permanent" custody of … Id. 13 to a parent "qualified to give care to the child," G.
Cited 0 timesPublished214 Mass. 19 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 25, 1913
been said that “It should never be held that Congress intends to supersede or by its legislation suspend the exercise of the police power of the States, even when it may do so, unless the purpose to effect that result is clearly … It did not say, however, that he should be immune from valid police regulations by the several States. It went no further than to say that the federal act did not apply to him.
Cited 10 timesPublished401 Mass. 627 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 8, 1988
Such instructions clearly were correct. Id. … Establishment of religion.
Cited 45 timesPublishedUnion Institution for Savings v. City of Boston
129 Mass. 82 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 30, 1880
L. 85; Lord Chancellor Cairns and Lord Selborne were clearly of a different opinion. … In a later case, Lord Justice Amphlett considered it to be clearly established by the" previous decisions that in the case of a mercantile security it is to be supposed that the parties intended interest to run on at the
Cited 30 timesPublishedAntioch Temple, Inc. v. Parekh
383 Mass. 854 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 30, 1981
P. 53 (e) (2) (in nonjury ac *863 tions court is to accept master’s factual findings “unless clearly erroneous”). … to a master’s report in nonjury cases, “clearly stating the grounds for each objection.” 365 Mass. 817 (1974).
Overruled by Callahan v. First Congregational Church, 441 Mass. 699 (2004)Cited 32 timesPublished
Ask Donna