Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.29s
332 Mass. 757 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 3, 1955
Brown, who died on November 10, 1952, seeks to set aside a joint bank account created by the decedent with her daughter Theresa L. Brown. … Hiller v. Hiller, 305 Mass. 163 . MacLennan v. MacLennan, 316 Mass. 593, 595 .
Cited 0 timesPublished326 Mass. 793 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 28, 1950
Mangan v. Howard, 238 Mass. 1, 5 . Millett v. Temple, 280 Mass. 543, 549 . Gowell v. Twitchell, 306 Mass. 482, 487 . Greeley v. Flynn, 310 Mass. 23, 26 .
Cited 0 timesPublished444 Mass. 188 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 11, 2005
See DiGiovanni v. Board of Appeals of Rockport, 19 Mass. App. … DiGiovanni v. Board of Appeals of Rockport, 19 Mass. App. Ct. 339, 346-347 (1985).
Cited 33 timesPublished254 Mass. 404 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 7, 1926
In consequence of the action of the retirement board, the auditor and the treasurer of the city of Boston refused to certify the plaintiff’s name on the salary list. … "Under the authority of Attorney General v. Tillinghast, sufra, and the numerous cases there collected and reviewed, the petitioner is an officer and not an employee.
Cited 9 timesPublished158 Mass. 470 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 8, 1893
See also Webb v. Noah, 1 Edw. Ch. 604, 615 ; Hughes v. Sanders, 3 Bibb, 360 ; Foley v. Kirk, 6 Stew. 170 , 174. … Fowler v. Palmer, 62 N. Y. 533 .
Cited 0 timesPublished71 Mass. 108 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1855
Garland v. Salem Bank, 9 Mass. 408 . Exceptions sustained.
Cited 0 timesPublished68 Mass. 359 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1854
Griggs v. Austin, 3 Pick. 20 . Watson v. Duykinck, 3 Johns. 335 . Caze v. Baltimore Ins. Co. 7 Cranch, 358 . Welch v. Hicks, 6 Cow. 504 . Pitman v. Hooper, 3 Sumner, 66. 3 Kent Com. (6th ed.) 219. … Mulloy v. Backer, 5 East, 321. See also Howland v. Brig Lavinia, 1 Pet. Adm. 123 ; 3 Kent Com. 219; Abbott on Shipping, (5th Amer. ed.) 405, note ; Angell on Carriers, § 391; Watson v. Duykinck, 3 Johns. 335 .
Cited 0 timesPublished90 Mass. 590 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1864
Donaldson v. Wood, 22 Wend. 400 . McDermott v. Palmer, 4 Selden, 383. Barclay’s Appeal, 13 Penn. State R. 497. Gaule v. Bilyeau, 25 Penn. State R. 522, 523. Truesdell v. Gay, 13 Gray, 311 . Rathbun v. … Parker v. Bell, 7 Gray, 433 . Whitford v. Newell, 2 Allen, 426 . In Lewin v.
Cited 0 timesPublished61 Mass. 220 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1851
Each case in this respect must depend on its own peculiar circumstances, *223 Cazenove v. Cutler, 4 Met. 246 . … The reasoning of the court in Mann v. Richardson , before cited, fully sustains these views, and we can see no difference in principle between that case and the case at bar. Stewart v. Clark, 11 Met. 384 ; 2 Dan. Ch.
Cited 0 timesPublished419 Mass. 548 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 24, 1995
It is not enough to show that the board “exceeded, abused or ‘distorted’ its legal authority,” Creative Env’ts, Inc. v. … In Littlefield v.
Cited 73 timesPublished90 Mass. 209 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 15, 1864
Coburn v. Palmer, 10 Cush. 273 . So if the plaintiff had consented to the proceeding, the judgment would have been discharged. But he cannot be regarded as consenting to it. … The case of Kellogg v. Gilbert, 10 Johns. 220 , seems to show that he had not such power.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDoe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
483 Mass. 131 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 13, 2019
No. 496501 v. Sex Offender Registry Board , 482 Mass. 643 , 650, 126 N.E.3d 939 (2019) ( Doe No. 496501 ), quoting 803 Code Mass. Regs. § 1.20(2) (2016). … No. 151564 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd ., 456 Mass. 612 , 625-626, 925 N.E.2d 533 (2010) (error for board to disregard mitigating evidence). See also New Boston Garden Corp . v.
Cited 56 timesPublishedBrown v. Inhabitants of Wenham
51 Mass. 495 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 15, 1845
Cited 1 timesPublished149 Mass. 35 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 2, 1889
The instructions given upon the weight to be given to the evidence of the confession were substantially in accordance with the decisions in Commonwealth, v. Galligan, 113 Mass. 202 ; Commonwealth v. … Sanborn, 116 Mass. 61 ; and Commonwealth v. Christie, 145 Mass. 232 . Exceptions overruled.
Cited 0 timesPublished29 Mass. 216 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 11, 1831
The relation of Moses Brown the elder was that of a mortgagee, who had not entered for condition broken. … Goodwin v. Richardson, 11 Mass. R. 469 . So because the debt goes to personal representatives, the executor and not the heir shall be deemed seised of the mortgaged premises and have an action for them. Smith v.
Cited 0 timesPublished22 Mass. 178 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1827
Allen v. Megguire, 15 Mass. R. 490 ; Parker v. Kinsman, 8 Mass. R. 486 ; Burlingame v. Bell, 16 Mass. … According to the case of Burlingame v.
Cited 0 timesPublished21 Mass. 137 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 3, 1826
Mitchell, 1 Cowen, 319; Parish v. Stanton, 2 Root, 154 ; Carpenter v. Crane, 1 Root, 98 ; Warren v. Powers, 5 Connect. R. 373; Wolcott v. Dwight, 2 Day, 405 ; Henries v. … R. 308; Keay v. Goodwin, 16 Mass. R. 1 , Gould’s Pl. c. 8, § 78; Sterns v. Patterson, 14 Johns. R. 132; Andrus v. Waring, 20 Johns. R. 263; but it is aided by verdict Gould’s Pl. c. 8, § 79.
Cited 0 timesPublished88 Mass. 333 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 15, 1863
Shearer v. Handy, 22 Pick. 417 . Barrows v. Capen, *335 11 Cush. 37 . … See Fletcher v. Webster, 5 Allen, 566 . In the case of Skillings v.
Cited 0 timesPublished49 Mass. 51 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 15, 1844
In Hays v.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 Mass. 254 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1840
Porter v. Hill, 9 Mass. 34 . Bartlet v. Harlow, 12 Mass. 348 . French v. Lund, 1 N. Hamp. 42. … Varnum v. Abbot, 12 Mass. 474 . Nichols v. Smith, 22 Pick. 316 . Such conveyance or levy, therefore, is good against the grantor and all claiming under him.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna