Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmass

10,000+ results

0.73s

  • Birudavol v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    448 Mass. 1031 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 13, 2007

    Fisch v. Board of Registration in Med., 437 Mass. 128, 131 (2002). … “We defer to the board’s expertise in making that determination,” Sugarman v. Board of Registration in Med., 422 Mass. 338, 347 (1996), citing Aronoff v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Weiner v. Board of Registration of Psychologists

    416 Mass. 675 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 29, 1993

    Bell v. Mackey, 191 S.C. 105 , 3 S.E. 2d 816, 824, 825 [1939]. Furthermore, the instant Order to Show Cause is violative of [801 Code Mass. … Vinal v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 13 Mass. App. Ct. 85, 102 (1982). See Morris v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 405 Mass. 103, 110-111 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 977 (1989).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bigham v. Planning Board of North Reading

    362 Mass. 860 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 5, 1972

    The defendant planning board appeals under G. … While it is true that the granting of the 1963 mortgage was subject to the then recorded covenant (see Costanza & Bertolino, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of No.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Fiske v. Board of Selectmen of Hopkinton

    354 Mass. 269 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 6, 1968

    North Shore Corp. v. Selectmen of Topsfield, 322 Mass. 413, 418 , and cases cited. In the instant case the allegations are speculative and the damage alleged is generalized. … Fino v. Municipal Court of the City of Boston, 326 Mass. 277 . Cliff v. Board of Health of Amesbury, 343 Mass. 58 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Samel v. City of Pittsfield Licensing Board

    377 Mass. 908 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 12, 1978

    On June 10, 1974, the Pittsfield licensing board (board) voted to deny the application on the ground of the church’s objection. … Luke’s Hosp. v. Labor Relations Comm’n, 320 Mass. 467, 470 (1946). G. L. c. 231A, § 2. See East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Comm’n Against Discrimination, 364 Mass. 444, 449-451 (1973).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • MacDonald v. Board of Health of Braintree

    347 Mass. 76 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 27, 1964

    Jordan *78 Marsh Co. v. Labor Relations Commn. 312 Mass. 597, 599 . By Gr. … See Wellesley College v. Attorney Gen. 313 Mass. 722, 731 ; MacKenzie v. School Comm. of Ipswich, 342 Mass. 612, 614 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Providence & Worcester Railroad v. Energy Facilities Siting Board

    453 Mass. 135 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 27, 2009

    Brown v. Guerrier, 390 Mass. 631, 632 (1983). 2. The board’s eminent domain authority. Our review of the board’s decision, governed by both G. L. c. 164, § 69P, and G. … Dep’t v. Department of Pub. Utils., supra. “The party appealing from a decision of the board bears the burden of showing that the decision is invalid.” Andover v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Riva v. Massachusetts Parole Board

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 18, 2017

    occurred in the course of the proceedings before the board. … See, e.g., Madison v. Commonwealth, 466 Mass. 1033, 1033 (2013), and cases cited. The single justice did not err or abuse his discretion in denying relief under G.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Costa v. Board of Appeals of Watertown

    340 Mass. 380 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 8, 1960

    The board of appeals under the zoning by-law of Watertown has appealed from the final decree in *381 the Superior Court which annulled the issuance of a permit to James P. … See Burnham v. Board of Appeals of Gloucester, 333 Mass. 114 ; St. 1954, c. 134, § 1, amending G. L. c. 140, § 27; Von Der Heide v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Somers, Westchester County, 204 Misc. (N.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Veksler v. Board of Registration in Dentistry

    429 Mass. 650 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 11, 1999

    Commonwealth v. Rancourt, 399 Mass. 269, 278 (1987). See Sussman v. … Pinecrest Village, Inc. v. MacMillan, 425 Mass. 70, 73 (1997). Given the clear language of G. L. c. 112, the regulation cannot foreclose the petitioner’s right to a hearing.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Assessors v. Commissioner of Revenue

    379 Mass. 841 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 21, 1980

    The boards of assessors of the towns of Edgar-town and West Tisbury filed complaints in the Superior Court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. … In 1967, the town of Amherst appealed the valuation of its State owned land to the Appellate Tax Board and ultimately to this court. We held in Assessors of Amherst v. State Tax Comm’n, 357 Mass. 505 (1970), that G.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Healy v. Board of Appeals of Watertown

    356 Mass. 130 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 3, 1969

    The failure of the plaintiffs to include a copy of the de- *132 cisión of the board with the notices of the bill in equity served on the defendants was not a jurisdictional defect. Opie v. … The decision of the board was incorporated in the bill. On the issue whether, on facts such as are recited in the board’s decision to have been stated at the hearing, a variance could validly be granted, see Abbott v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Walden v. Board of Registration in Nursing

    395 Mass. 263 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 26, 1985

    See Blue Hills Cemetery, Inc. v. Board of Registration in Embalming & Funeral Directing, 379 Mass. 368 , 373 n.8 (1979). … See Raymond v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 387 Mass. 708, 713 (1982); Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in Medicine, 378 Mass. 519,526-527 (1979).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rose v. Board of Appeals of Wrentham

    352 Mass. 301 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 3, 1967

    Brady v. Board of Appeals of Westport, 348 Mass. 515, 524 . 2. There was no error in the judge’s ruling that the board “legally denied the appeal of the petitioners for a variance.” … The principle is well established that “ [r]arely can a court order the granting of a variance when the board has denied the petition. No person has a legal right to a variance.” Ferrante v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Reilly v. Board of Selectmen of Framingham

    345 Mass. 363 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 1, 1963

    In usual course the board, at any meeting of which due notice has been given, may act on any matter. Russell v. Wellington, 157 Mass. 100,104-105 . … Elmer v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of Boston, 343 Mass. 24, 26-27 . The vote to remove was taken at a public meeting. Order for judgment affirmed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hoffer v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    457 Mass. 1004 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 25, 2010

    The board has moved to dismiss this appeal as moot, in light of the subsequent actions of the board. … See Commonwealth v. Grant, 455 Mass. 1022, 1023 (2010); Moe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 444 Mass. 1009, 1009-1010 (2005).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Edel-Brown Tool & Die Co., Inc.

    381 Mass. 1 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 25, 1980

    Chase v. Roy, 363 Mass. 402, 404 (1973). … Eutectic Corp. v. Astralloy-Vulcan Corp., 510 F.2d 1111, 1115 (5th Cir. 1975). 3. Edel-Brown next presses a question of evidence related to its estoppel argument.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Board of Appeals of Holden

    370 Mass. 95 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 6, 1976

    They premise their argument on the *97 contention that under Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 82 (1972) , and Armstrong v. … Reid v. Acting Comm'r of Dept. of Community Affairs, 362 Mass. 136, 140 (1972). Hayeck v. Metropolitan Dist. Comm’n, 335 Mass. 372, 375 (1957). Joslin Mfg. Co. v. Providence, 262 U.S. 668, 678 (1923). 4 2.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • City of Somerville v. Commonwealth Employment Relations Board

    470 Mass. 563 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 3, 2015

    Further, the board ordered the city and the school committee to restore the terms of the retirement health insurance benefit that was in 10 The Commonwealth Employment Relations Board (board) is the body within … Middleborough, 468 Mass. at 271 (board of selectmen has statutory authority to establish percentage of total monthly premium for HMO coverage that is to be paid by town's retired employees); Yeretsky v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Benmosche v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    412 Mass. 82 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 2, 1992

    See Keigan v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 399 Mass. 719, 723 (1987); Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in Medicine, 378 Mass. 519, 525 (1979). … Bank v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.