Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmass

10,000+ results

1.30s

  • Chadwick v. Board of Registration in Dentistry

    461 Mass. 77 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 8, 2011

    D'Amour v. Board of Registration in Dentistry, supra, quoting Cherubino v. Board of Registration of Chiropractors, 403 Mass. 350, 354 (1988). … Board of Registration in Dentistry, 451 Mass. 786, 794 (2008), citing Hastings v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Carriere v. Board of Registrars of Voters

    257 Mass. 287 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 19, 1926

    Sterling v. Leyland & Co.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Weiner v. Board of Registration of Psychologists

    416 Mass. 675 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 29, 1993

    Bell v. Mackey, 191 S.C. 105 , 3 S.E. 2d 816, 824, 825 [1939]. Furthermore, the instant Order to Show Cause is violative of [801 Code Mass. … Vinal v. Contributory Retirement Appeal Bd., 13 Mass. App. Ct. 85, 102 (1982). See Morris v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 405 Mass. 103, 110-111 , cert. denied, 493 U.S. 977 (1989).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Herridge v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    424 Mass. 201 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 5, 1997

    In Herridge v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 420 Mass. 154 (1995) (Herridge 7), we considered Dr. … The board was required to confront the problems in the patient’s testimony and to provide ‘an explicit analysis of credibility and the evidence bearing on it.’ ” Id. at 164-165, quoting Morris v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kelloway v. Board of Appeal of Melrose

    361 Mass. 249 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 25, 1972

    The board, in its decision, properly stated that “it would have been more appropriate for the board of aldermen to exempt property of this character.” See Pierce v. Wellesley, 336 Mass. 517, 518-519, 521, 523-524 . … We think the remedy at law is not adequate (see Kenyon v. Chicopee, 320 Mass. 528, 534 ; Mark v. Kahn, 333 Mass. 517, 520 ; compare Smith v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bigham v. Planning Board of North Reading

    362 Mass. 860 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 5, 1972

    The defendant planning board appeals under G. … While it is true that the granting of the 1963 mortgage was subject to the then recorded covenant (see Costanza & Bertolino, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of No.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Po Kee Wong v. Boston Retirement Board

    448 Mass. 1012 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 13, 2007

    Wong, a former Boston public school teacher, was denied certain employ *1013 ment credits by the Boston Retirement Board (board). … See Maza v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1006 (1996). Judgment affirmed. Order denying motion for reconsideration affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Fiske v. Board of Selectmen of Hopkinton

    354 Mass. 269 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 6, 1968

    North Shore Corp. v. Selectmen of Topsfield, 322 Mass. 413, 418 , and cases cited. In the instant case the allegations are speculative and the damage alleged is generalized. … Fino v. Municipal Court of the City of Boston, 326 Mass. 277 . Cliff v. Board of Health of Amesbury, 343 Mass. 58 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Mastrangelo v. Board of Health of Watertown

    340 Mass. 491 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 8, 1960

    The case of Attorney Gen. v. … , and determine when he should be removed, citing Gaw v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Samel v. City of Pittsfield Licensing Board

    377 Mass. 908 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 12, 1978

    On June 10, 1974, the Pittsfield licensing board (board) voted to deny the application on the ground of the church’s objection. … Luke’s Hosp. v. Labor Relations Comm’n, 320 Mass. 467, 470 (1946). G. L. c. 231A, § 2. See East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Comm’n Against Discrimination, 364 Mass. 444, 449-451 (1973).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Ingalls v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    445 Mass. 291 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Nov 14, 2005

    Weinberg v. Board of Registration in Med., 443 Mass 679, 685 (2005), quoting Fisch v. Board of Registration in Med., 437 Mass. 128, 131 (2002). … Weinberg v. Board of Registration in Med., supra, citing Fisch v. Board of Registration in Med., supra. We now turn to the reported questions. Discussion. 1. Board proceeding, a. Good cause.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • American Can Co. v. Milk Control Board

    316 Mass. 337 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 2, 1944

    American Can Co. v. Milk Control Board, 313 Mass. 156 . … We understand that the board no longer objects to that part of the decree of the Superior Court which enjoins the enforcement of paragraph 5 of Article V of Official Order No. G17-504.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Henry Perkins Co. v. Board of Assessors

    377 Mass. 117 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 17, 1979

    We review a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (Board) which, on a taxpayer’s appeal pursuant to the "formal” procedure (G. … Board of Environmental Protection, 333 A.2d 703 (Me. 1975) (compare Ethyl Corp. v. Adams, 375 A.2d 1065 [Me. 1977]). Cf. Covert Township Assessor v. State Tax Comm’n, 77 Mich. App. 626 (1977); Meijer, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ramirez v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    441 Mass. 479 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 16, 2004

    We affirm the board’s decision. See Cherubino v. Board of Registration of Chiropractors, 403 Mass. 350 , 352 n.4 (1988). 2. Discussion. … Goldstein v. Board of Registration of Chiropractors, 426 Mass. 606, 613 (1998), and cases cited.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dugdale v. Board of Registration in Medicine

    270 Mass. 65 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 15, 1930

    The board found in the Caton case that for ten weeks or more preceding the death of Mrs. … The board heard the witnesses, and the statements made by the petitioner; the degree of credibility to be given to the *69 witnesses was for the board.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Riva v. Massachusetts Parole Board

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 18, 2017

    occurred in the course of the proceedings before the board. … See, e.g., Madison v. Commonwealth, 466 Mass. 1033, 1033 (2013), and cases cited. The single justice did not err or abuse his discretion in denying relief under G.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodwin v. Board of Selectmen of Hopkinton

    358 Mass. 164 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 13, 1970

    Seekonk v. John J. McHale & Sons, Inc. 325 Mass. 271, 274 . Raimondo v. Board of Appeals of Bedford, 331 Mass. 228, 230 . … In Butler v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Garelick v. Board of Appeals of Franklin

    350 Mass. 289 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 14, 1966

    The decision of the board was not “responsive” to the plaintiffs’ appeal. MacGibbon v. Board of Appeals of Duxbury, 347 Mass. 690, 692 . … The board could not, as it attempted to do, preclude a one or two room apartment under the provisions of § V-E.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Healy v. Board of Appeals of Watertown

    356 Mass. 130 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 3, 1969

    The failure of the plaintiffs to include a copy of the de- *132 cisión of the board with the notices of the bill in equity served on the defendants was not a jurisdictional defect. Opie v. … The decision of the board was incorporated in the bill. On the issue whether, on facts such as are recited in the board’s decision to have been stated at the hearing, a variance could validly be granted, see Abbott v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dolan v. Board of Appeals of Chatham

    359 Mass. 699 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 21, 1971

    Inc. v. Planning Bd. of Randolph, 340 Mass. 149 . 1953 House Doc. No. 2249. … Uliasz v. Gillette, 357 Mass. 96, 103-104 . We have considered all the arguments advanced by the plaintiffs and have dealt with such of them as require discussion.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.