Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmass

1,873 results

1.24s

  • Attorney General v. M.C.K., Inc.

    432 Mass. 546 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 13, 2000

    In the case of Union Square, Konig established Reifer, Inc. (Rei-fer), to hold title to the real estate and tangible assets used in the operation of the home, and M.C.K., Inc. … contemplates that the receiver may also make major repairs to the real or personal property of the facility, to the extent necessary to prevent or remove jeopardy to the health, safety, or welfare of the residents, or to minimally qualify

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Tobin v. Norwood Country Club, Inc.

    422 Mass. 126 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 22, 1996

    If the jury find that the establishment knew or reasonably should have known that the establishment was furnishing alcohol to minors, the establishment has breached its duty of care and, if causation is established, may be … In this case, the decedent was clearly a minor by either definition. If she had been not age seventeen but age twelve, our decision would, we suppose, seem inevit *138 able.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College

    436 Mass. 347 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 19, 2002

    Second, by demonstrating that we intend narrowly to interpret the qualifying factor, i.e., what matters are within the scope of an individual’s employment, for purposes of this rule and the common-law rule of evidence announced … Those employees clearly had a measure of supervisory responsibility over Stanford, whose job performance was to be a central issue in her discrimination litigation.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Enos v. Secretary of Environmental Affairs

    432 Mass. 132 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 14, 2000

    in analyzing environmental impacts; in tracing, summarizing, and quantifying environmental effects; in discussing alternatives to proposed mitigation measures; in failing to address the “no-build” alternative; and in not clearly … This language, however, was not meant to establish a broad rule that would allow anyone alleging potential property damage from a proposed project to use G.

    Cited 67 timesPublished
  • In re a Subpoena Duces Tecum

    445 Mass. 685 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 5, 2006

    We may reverse the motion judge only if his findings are clearly erroneous or tainted with some error of law. See Bougas v. Chief of Police of Lexington, 371 Mass. 59, 61 (1976). … L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth, details specific exemptions to the public records statute, but in order for a record to qualify as exempt, the custodian of the record has the burden ‘to prove with specificity’ that an exemption

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Care & Protection of Robert

    408 Mass. 52 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 16, 1990

    Prior to the care and protection hearing, the court must order a qualified person to investigate the child’s situation. G. L. c. 119, § 24. … However, notwithstanding the precious character of a parent’s relationship with his or her children, the parent’s interest is not immune from State intervention.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • McDuffy v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Education

    415 Mass. 545 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 15, 1993

    In the statement of these two premises for which the duty is established it is revealed that: The duty is established so that the rights and liberties of the people will be preserved. … In addition to establishing a system of public schools, the General Court also established and supported a college.

    Cited 80 timesPublished
  • Moss's Case

    451 Mass. 704 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 30, 2008

    Clearly a causal relationship is required between the employment duties and the injury or death. … been rendered unable to testify should qualify for workers’ compensation benefits unless persuasive contrary evidence indicates otherwise.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Loffredo v. Center for Addictive Behaviors

    426 Mass. 541 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 29, 1998

    It is worth noting that the court in Berdos qualified its holding considerably in the latter part of its opinion. … Moreover, the statute does clearly indicate the Legislature’s contemplation of other remedies to respond to violations of regulations promulgated pursuant to § 7.

    Cited 58 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Sliech-Brodeur

    457 Mass. 300 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jul 19, 2010

    number of courts . . . have upheld without much discussion the seizure of documents during an otherwise valid search as in ‘plain view’ notwithstanding the fact that some perusal, generally fairly brief, of the documents was clearly … Accordingly, a court-ordered psychiatric examination of a defendant in these circumstances cannot take place unless there is constitutionally adequate immunity available, see id. at 761-764 , or, in the absence of immunity

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Elliot

    393 Mass. 824 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 4, 1985

    “The danger of *834 prejudice most clearly arises when the prior convictions are similar in nature to the indictments on trial. ... … It is firmly and wisely established in our law that no defendant should be convicted of a crime by proof of his reputation or propensity to commit similar crimes. ...

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Kennebec Co. v. Augusta Insurance & Banking

    72 Mass. 204 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1856

    These facts were fully established by the evidence produced upon the trial, and are not now denied. … They did in fact establish an agency there. Of that no question is made.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Chapman

    54 Mass. 68 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Sep 15, 1847

    of judges whose knowledge of that law — the unwritten or customary law — is derived from experience and study, and from being “ long personally accustomed to the judicial decisions of their predecessors,” and of course qualified … But the publication of a libel maliciously, and with intent to defame, is clearly an offence against law. This case of Commonwealth v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Brotherhood Accident Co.

    194 Mass. 1 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 4, 1907

    An interpretation founded upon such a basis of distinction, and leading to results so unreasonable is not to be adopted unless clearly required by unmistakable language. … By the terms of this policy the facts and circumstances of the accident and injury are to be established by those who saw them.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Leavitt v. Mizner

    404 Mass. 81 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 13, 1989

    However, since the purpose of summary judgment can be served before trial, the decision of a trial court judge to deny summary judgment clearly is reviewable on an interlocutory appeal. … The plaintiffs’ admitted failure to use available procedures to procure the desired evidence establishes for summary judgment purposes that the plaintiffs did not exercise the diligence necessary to establish evidence as

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • AM. GRAIN PROD. PROCESSING INST v. Dept. of Pub. Hlth.

    392 Mass. 309 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 27, 1984

    To accept such an argument would be in contravention of the clearly expressed intention of the Legislature. … O'Reilly, Administrative Rulemaking 40 (1983) ("No agency is immune from tough judicial review, and the good cause exception is especially deserving of tough scrutiny").

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gurnack v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

    406 Mass. 748 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 26, 1990

    The issue of suicide or accident was not clearly resolved on the record Hancock had accumulated on that date. The last word on the proper procedure for judicial review of ERISA claim denials has not been written. … (BNA) 1708 , 1714 (Sept. 11, 1989) (the District Court should have made a finding “on the obviously important question of whether — putting aside any administrative misfeasance — [the plaintiff] actually qualified for . .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. LaBrie

    473 Mass. 754 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 9, 2016

    Although the presence of a stronger, more treatment-resistant form of cancer may qualify as a "bodily injury" under the statutory definition, see G. … funds to retain an independent oncologist in order to rebut the testimony of Friedmann, a key witness for the Commonwealth's case, but later decided not to consult an oncologist on the grounds that (1) an effort to establish

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Shea

    401 Mass. 731 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 1, 1988

    As we have noted, “defense trial tactics are not immune from comment.” Commonwealth v. Bradshaw, 385 Mass. 244, 272 (1982). *740 3. Evidence of consciousness of guilt. … Finally, the judge clearly emphasized that the Commonwealth has the burden of proving all the elements of the crimes charged.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Department of Revenue v. Lopez

    477 Mass. 268 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 9, 2017

    Thus, whether a child qualifies for SIJ status and whether to grant or deny an immigrant child's application for SIJ status is beyond the jurisdiction of the Probate and Family Court. … Last, the record clearly establishes that E.G.'s interests are not best served by returning to Guatemala, the country of origin.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.