Case law

Prudential Insurance v. Turner & Newall, PLC

137 F.R.D. 178 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 14, 1991

Lois Sportswear, U.S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Co., 104 F.R.D. 103 (S.D.N.Y., 1985); Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Garvey, 109 F.R.D. 323 (N.D.Cal., 1985); Liggett Group v. … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Group, 116 F.R.D. 205 (M.D.N.C., 1986); Parkway Gallery v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc., 116 F.R.D. 46 (M.D.N.C., 1987); Bud Antle, Inc. v.

Brown v. Overton

4 F. Cas. 418 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1859

There was a conversation between the master and officers, and the only passenger on board, as to the necessity of going into that island; the question being whether, if they retained the libellant on board, mortification … There was no surgical skill on board, and the unceasing motion of the ship, and the accidents and discomforts to which he was necessarily exposed, were unfavorable to his cure.

Brown v. Colvin

111 F. Supp. 3d 89 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 2015

Brown cites Cabral and Bazile v. Apfel, 113 F.Supp.2d 181 (D.Mass.2000) in support of her contention. … Aug. 6, 2013); see also Pires v.

Lowell v. Brown

280 F. 193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 17, 1922

I rule that Brown is, on the ground of infancy alone,' entitled to a decree. MacGreal v. Taylor, 167 U. S. 688 , 17 Sup. Ct. 961, 42 L. Ed. 326 ; Tucker v. Moreland, 10 Pet. 58 , 9 L. … Compare Smith v. Mottley, 150 Fed. 266 , 80 C. C. A. 154 ; Board of Com’rs of Crawford County v. Strawn, 157 Fed. 49 , 84 C. C. A. 553 , 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100; Peters v. Bain, 133 U. S. 670, 693 , 10 Sup.

Brown v. O'BRIEN

755 F. Supp. 2d 335 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 17, 2010

On November 24, 2008, Eric Brown (“Brown”), petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 , 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880 , 893 n. 4, 103 S.Ct. 3383 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1090 (1983)).

Selene Finance LP v. Brown (In re Brown)

563 B.R. 451 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 3, 2017

Brown that required Selene to take title to a property owned by Brown on which it held an unforeclosed mortgage. … See Canning v. Beneficial Me., Inc.

Brown v. Armstrong

957 F. Supp. 1293 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 24, 1997

Co. v. … To establish such claim, Plaintiffs must show, among other things, that Brown and Armstrong shared a confidential relationship and that Brown possessed a trade secret. See Burten v.

Financial Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

867 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2012

& Brown, Inc. … & Brown, Inc.

Brown v. Streeter

649 F. Supp. 1554 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 31, 1986

Commonwealth v. Brown, 376 Mass. 156 , 380 N.E.2d 113 (1978). … The Supreme Judicial Court, in its opinion in Brown, 376 Mass. at 163 , 380 N.E.2d 113 , reaffirmed its ruling in Commonwealth v.

Brown v. Corsini

657 F. Supp. 2d 296 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 2009

Reeves v. … “The Federal Constitution does not require evidence that logically precludes any conclusion but the one reached by the disciplinary board.” Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Walpole v.

Brown v. Pepe

42 F. Supp. 3d 310 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 8, 2014

See Brown v. Pepe, 2013 WL 3246127 , at *3 (D.Mass. June 25, 2013). … On November 12, 2013, Brown filed a second complaint in the Northern District of Georgia, this time omitting Sheriff Brown as a defendant. See Brown v. Pepe, No. 13-cv-03751 (N.D.Ga.2013) (Brown II).

Mendez v. Brown

311 F. Supp. 2d 134 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2004

See Bryson v. Shumway, 308 F.3d 79 , 88-89 (1st Cir.2002); Rolland v. Cellucci, 52 F.Supp.2d 231, 238-40 (D.Mass.1999). See also West-side Mothers v. Haveman, 289 F.3d 852, 862-63 (6th Cir.2002); Doe v. … See also Abrams v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, 354 F.3d 1094, 1096 (9th Cir.2004), Schwier v. Cox, 340 F.3d 1284, 1290 (11th Cir.2003), and Frison v.

Brown v. Massachusetts

950 F. Supp. 2d 274 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 30, 2013

Shaheed-Muhammad v. … Sanchez v. Pereira-Castillo, 590 F.3d 31, 49 (1st Cir.2009) (quoting Camilo-Robles v. Zapata, 175 F.3d 41, 44 (1st Cir.1999)).

Brown v. Fair

739 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 11, 1990

Commonwealth v. Brown, 394 Mass. 510 , 476 N.E.2d 580 (1985). … In moving to dismiss, respondent argues that the petition should be dismissed because Brown is in procedural default. Massachusetts has a “contemporaneous objection” rule. Commonwealth v.

FINANCIAL RESOURCES NETWORK, INC. v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

754 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 18, 2010

BROWN OF CALIFORNIA, INC., BROWN & BROWN, INC., AND CALSURANCE (DOCKET ENTRY #54); PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET ENTRY #59) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. … Adopting the arguments in the American Guarantee and Zu *133 rich North summary judgment motion, defendants Brown & Brown, Inc. (“B & B”), Brown & Brown of California, Inc.

Brown v. Gunter

428 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 2, 1977

Commonwealth v. Brown, Mass., 323 N.E.2d 902, 905 (1975). The case was accordingly remanded to the Superior Court for a new trial. … Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 794 , 89 S.Ct. 2056 , 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969); Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct. 1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970).

Brown v. Sweeney

526 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 1, 2007

Pittsley v. … Thore v. Howe, 466 F.3d 173, 179 (1st Cir.2006) (applying section 1983); Aulson v. Blanchard, 83 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1996) (applying section 1985). Brown does not indicate under which theory he pursues his claim.

Brown v. O'BRIEN

624 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 1, 2009

Commonwealth v. Brown, 449 Mass. 1102 , 865 N.E.2d 1140 (2007) (table). … See Early v.

Financial Resources Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc.

930 F. Supp. 2d 287 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 14, 2013

Pending before this court is a third summary judgment motion filed by defendants American Guarantee and Liability Insurance Company (“American Guarantee”), Zurich North America Company (“Zurich”), Brown & Brown, Inc. … (“B & B”), Brown & Brown of California, Inc. (“BBC”) and Calsurance (collectively “defendants”). (Docket Entry # 119). They seek summary judgment on counts I, III, IV, V and VI in the first amended complaint.

Dunn v. Brown

517 F. Supp. 2d 541 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 2007

Johnson v. Gordon, 409 F.3d 12, 18 (1st Cir.2005). … Johnson v. Gordon 409 F.3d at 18 (citation omitted).