Case law

United States v. Lewis

816 F. Supp. 789 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 5, 1993

Officers Leedberg and Keating then drove their unmarked police car into the parking lot, and stopped behind the brown car. … See United States v.

United States v. Romano

929 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 21, 1996

V. … In Baldwin v.

Stefan v. Laurenitis

695 F. Supp. 1330 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 1988

The Merits Test In Nadeau v. … See Burke v. Guiney, 700 F.2d at 772-73 . Stripped to its essentials, this case involves personality disputes between plaintiffs and one member of the Board of Health and one member of the Board of Selectmen.

Olitsky v. O'MALLEY

453 F. Supp. 1052 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 12, 1978

United States v. … In Craig v.

Roche v. Town of Wareham

24 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 29, 1998

Oliver v. … Compare Dartt v. Browning-Ferris Industries, 427 Mass. 1 , 691 N.E.2d 526 (Mass.1998) (approving a “pretext only” jury instruction), and Blare v.

Freight Drivers & Helpers Local Union 557 v. Quinn Freight Lines, Inc.

195 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 21, 1961

Since the Board’s exclusive jurisdiction over activities which are prohibited or protected by the Act preempts state courts from deciding such disputes, San Diego Building Trades Council v. … United Steelworkers of America (AFL-CIO), Local Union No. 4264 v. New Park Mining Co., 10 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 352 ; Lodge No. 12, Dist. No. 37, International Association of Machinists v.

Priolo v. Town of Kingston

839 F. Supp. 2d 454 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 2012

Cordi-Allen v. Conlon, 494 F.3d 245, 252 (1st Cir.2007). See also Pagan v. … In any event, as previously noted, the Board of Selectmen's individual votes on Town matters are themselves protected by the First Amendment. See Miller v. Town of Hull, 878 F.2d 523, 532 (1st Cir.1989).

Newhall v. Casey

18 F.2d 447 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 1927

Marshal v. Jaquith, 134 Mass. 138 ; Brown v. Brown, 174 Mass. 197 , 54 N. E. 532 , 75 Am. St. Rep. 292 ; Tucker v. Curtin (C. C. A.) 148 F. 929 . … Dexter v. Treas. and Rec. Gen., 243 Mass. 523 , 137 N. E. 877 ; Hill v. Nichols (D. C. Mass. March 16, 1927) 18 F.(2d) 139 . See, also, Vanderbilt v. Eidman, 196 U. S. 480 , 25 S. Ct. 331 , 49 L. Ed. 563 .

Hughes v. American Regent Laboratories

144 F.R.D. 177 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 30, 1992

Fowles v. Lingos, 30 Mass.App.Ct. 435 , 569 N.E.2d 416 , 420 & n. 8 (1991). The statute is clear. … Beth Israel Hospital v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 401 Mass. 172 , 515 N.E.2d 574, 579 (1987). By employing the word “shall,” section 204(a) is phrased in mandatory language.

Grenier v. Town of Shrewsbury

52 F. Supp. 3d 149 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2014

Carroll v. … Cruz v.

Clark v. Bissonnette

604 F. Supp. 710 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 14, 1985

from that Board each time. … Raskiewicz v. Town of New Boston, 754 F.2d 38 (1st Cir.1985); Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lebanon, 712 F.2d 1524 (1st Cir.1983); Cloutier v.

United States v. American Express Co.

177 F. 735 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 16, 1910

Cramer v. Arthur, 102 U. S. 612 , 26 L. … Cary v. Curtis, 3 How. 236 [ 11 L. Ed. 576 ]; Curtis v. Fiedler, 2 Black, 461, 478, 479 [ 17 L. Ed. 273 ]; Arnson v. Murphy, 109 U. S. 238, 240 [3 Sup. Ct. 184, 27 L. Ed. 920 ].

Mason v. Texas Co.

76 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 24, 1948

of decisions issued by the Board. 20. … The Catalonia, D.C., 236 F. 554 ; Agnew v. American President Lines, Ltd., D.C., 73 F. Sup. 944; Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co., 317 U.S. 239 , 63 S.Ct. 246 , 87 L.Ed. 239 ; Williston on Contracts, Sec. 621.

Electronic Molding Corp. v. Mupac Corp.

529 F. Supp. 300 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 22, 1981

In Contico International v. Rubbermaid, 506 F.Supp. 1072 , 210 U.S.P.Q. 649 (D.C. … D-223,109 was issued to EMC as assignee of James V. Murphy on March 14, 1972, for a design for an “Electronic Terminal.” U. S. Patent No. 3,784,965 was issued to EMC as assignee of James V.

Pye v. YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASS'N OF WESTERN MA

419 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 10, 2006

419 F.Supp.2d 20 (2006) Rosemary PYE, Regional Director of the First Region of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on behalf of the National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. … At that point, any final remedy which the Board could impose would be ineffective. Centro Medico, 900 F.2d at 454; see also NLRB v.

Filler v. Lernout (In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities Litigation)

286 B.R. 33 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 18, 2002

See Greenfield v. … See SEC v.

United States v. Jodoin

2 Mass. Supp. 84 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 16, 1981

Defendant checked his white suitcase, and subsequently ran toward the gate area where he boarded Flight 326. … Mendenhall, ante, 48 U.S.L.W. at 4581 (Powell, J., concurring); Brown v. Texas, 1969, 443 U.S. 47 , 52 n.2: Brignoni-Ponce, ante, 422 U.S. at 885. I find that the defendant’s liberty was not restrained.

Williams v. Box of Bullion

29 F. Cas. 1359 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1843

The box of bullion, while on board the Urania, was not in that peril required by law to make it the subject of salvage service. Abb. Ship. 554 ; 3 Kent, Comm. 245; Waite v. … See, also, Cutler v. Rea, 7 How. [48 U. S.] 731. [From 6 Law Rep. 363 .]

Hickey v. Secretary of Army

320 F. Supp. 1241 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 13, 1971

The precise denial of due process argument that is being urged herein was made by the plaintiff in Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686 (D. … See also Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 440, 442 , 80 S.Ct. 1502, 1513 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1307 (1960).” The line of cases cited above, particularly Brown v. McNamara, supra, and Winters v.

Massachusetts Medical Society v. Dukakis

637 F. Supp. 684 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 5, 1986

For example, the Supreme Court did not confine itself to record evidence in considering the fundamental issues presented in Brown v. … Citing North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder’s Drug Stores, Inc., 414 U.S. 156 , 94 S.Ct. 407 , 38 L.Ed.2d 379 (1973); Williamson v.