Case law

Vanderbilt v. Town of Chilmark

174 F.R.D. 225 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 18, 1997

See, e.g., Hancock v. Hobbs, 967 F.2d 462, 467 (11th Cir.1992); Hancock v. … See Sax v.

Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. World Airways, Inc.

262 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 30, 1966

(“World”) from violating certain rules of the Civil Aeronautics Board (“Board”) while operating a charter flight program. … Lynch v. Lyons, 1938, 303 Mass. 116, 117, 119 , 20 N.E.2d 953 . Lahr v. Adell Chemical Co., 1 Cir., 1962, 300 F.2d 256 .

Linn v. Andover Newton Theological School

642 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 7, 1985

Leite v. … V.

Ex parte Chung Thet Poy

13 F.2d 262 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 4, 1926

Chin Hoy v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 293 F. 750 ; Lew Shee v. Nagle (C. C. A.) 7 F.(2d) 367 ; Christy v. Leong Don (C. C. A.) 5 F.(2d) 135 . See, also, Kwock Jan Fat v. White, 253 U. S. 454 , 40 S. Ct. 566 , 64 L. … Ed. 1010 ; Ng Fung Ho v. White, 259 U. S. 276 , 42 S. Ct. 492 , 66 L. Ed. 938. I do not think the conclusion which I have reached in the case at bar is in conflict with the majority opinion in Johnson v. Kock Shing (C.

Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.

39 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 2, 1941

The flow-board of this device was 20% inches long and 18% inches wide and the top edge of the flow-board, which formed a weir between the baffle and the flow-board, was % of an inch thick. … Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., May 12, 1941, 61 S.Ct. 948 , 85 L.Ed.-; Hailes et al. v. Van Wormer et al., 20 Wall. 353 , 87 U.S. 353 , 22 L.Ed. 241, 249 ; Grosjean et al. v.

Sachs v. Sprague

401 F. Supp. 2d 159 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 22, 2005

See Landy v. D’Alessandro, 316 F.Supp.2d 49, 57 (D.Mass.2004). In Rales v. … See Guttman v.

Doe v. Emerson College

271 F. Supp. 3d 337 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2017

Wills v. Brown Univ., 184 F.3d 20, 26 (1st Cir. 1999). However, if earlier measures have proved inadequate to prevent further harassment, a school “may be-required to..take further steps to avoid new liability.” Id. … Wills v. Brown Univ., 184 F.3d at 26 . Here, the undisputed facts in the.record demonstrate that Emerson’s response to Doe’s allegations was timely and reasonable.

Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.

582 F. Supp. 734 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 1984

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated that judgment in Kartell v. … Brown, supra, immunizes most of the challenged conduct from antitrust attack. Kartell v. Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc., 542 F.Supp. 782 (D.Mass.1982).

Cellco Partnership v. Town of Douglas

81 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 28, 1999

Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490, 494-97 (2d Cir.1999). … See Virginia Metronet, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 984 F.Supp. 966, 970 (E.D.Va.1998). In that event, the regulation is unlawful under the statute’s “effect” provision.

Ex parte Haralampopoulos

286 F. 432 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 26, 1923

It was held in Nishimura v. United States, 142 U. S. 661 , 12 Sup. Ct. 338, 35 L. … And again, in Gegiow v. Uhl, 239 U. S. 3 , 36 Sup. Ct. 2, 60 L. Ed. 114 , Mr.

United States v. Warren Transp. Co.

7 F.2d 161 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1925

These permits were issued at Norfolk by a board known, as the “regional board” until December 2, 1919, when all outstanding permits by the regional board were revoked, and thereafter permits were issued from a central board … Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation (D. C.) 295 F. 372 ; United States v. George A. Fuller Co., Inc. (D. C.) 296 F. 178 ; Maxwell v. United States (C. C.

Brockton Fire Department v. St. Mary Broad Street, LLC

181 F. Supp. 3d 155 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 13, 2016

Middlesex Opportunity Council, Inc. v. … Corp. v.

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Northeast Airlines, Inc.

400 F. Supp. 372 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 25, 1975

The Act provides that such disputes may be submitted by either party for settlement by a System Board of Adjustment and that the award of the Board is not subject to judicial review. 45 U.S.C. § 184 . … See, e. g., American Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 445 F.2d 891 , 895 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1015 , 92 S.Ct. 674 , 30 L.Ed.2d 663 (1972); Chaudoin v.

In Re Sapient Corporation Derivative Litigation

555 F. Supp. 2d 259 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 29, 2008

Grossman v. Johnson, 89 F.R.D. 656, 660-661 (D.Mass.1981) (Tauro, J.), aff'd, 674 F.2d 115 (1st Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom. Grossman v. … See also Shlensky v.

Simas v. First Citizens' Federal Credit Union

996 F. Supp. 76 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 6, 1998

See Shealy v. … Bessey left, the board made the decision not to replace that position. It was a board decision. That was brought to the board. # i»í ifc ^ A.

In Re Smith & Wesson Holding Corp. Derivative Litigation

743 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 20, 2010

Thus, before filing a derivative action, a plaintiff must either present a written demand to the Board or explain why demand would be futile. 3 Aronson v. … In fact, by issuing a demand rather than pleading that demand was excused, Plaintiffs have "tacitly concede[d] the independence of a majority of the board to respond.” Spiegel v.

Roche v. Donahue

985 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 6, 1997

Correa-Martinez v. … Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24, 27 , 101 S.Ct. 183, 186 , 66 L.Ed.2d 185 (1980). See also, Roche v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.

The Susan

23 F. Cas. 440 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1859

The cases Lea v. The Alexander [Case No. S,153], and Callagan v. Hallett, 1 Caines. 104, were decided not upon the general law, but upon the positive enactments of a New York statute. … That the salvors have no right to act against the will of the master, see Clark v. The Dodge Healey [Case Ño. 2.849]; The Bee [Id. 1,219].

The Bound Brook

146 F. 160 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 25, 1906

Patterson v. … In Commonwealth v. Bartlett, 190 Mass. 148 , 76 N.

Collins Mfg. Co. v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co.

11 F.2d 196 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 16, 1926

Celia, Adler & Tilles v. Brown et.al. (C. C.) 136 F. 439 ; Atlanta, K. & N. Ry. Co. v. Southern Ry. Co., 131 F. 657 , 66 C. C. A. 601 ; Garrard v. Silver Peak Mines (C. C.) 76 F. 1 ; Champlain Const. Co. v. … See Howes v. Maxwell, 32 N. E. 152 , 157 Mass. 333 ; Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Asso., 24 S. Ct. 30 , 191 U. S. 78 , 48 L. Ed. 103 . In Mahoney v. United States Shipping Board, etc. (Mass.) 148 N.