Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmad

6,281 results

1.04s

  • Fiske

    141 F. 188 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 18, 1905

    The rider had been tested for the work it was expected to do by its previous use on board. … McCarron v. Dominion Atlantic Railway Company (D. C.) 134 Fed. 762, 764 . The libelant lives in Virginia, and had no home or family in Boston.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Mailloux v. Kiley

    323 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 1971

    Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 ; Keefe v. Geanakos, 418 F.2d 359 , 1st Cir. … Keyishian v. Board of Regents, Keefe v. Geanakos and Parducci v. Rutland, all supra. Plaintiff, in accordance with Parducci v. Rutland, is entitled to a judgment directing : 1.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Cole v. Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund

    225 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 30, 2002

    Seitz v. Board of Trustees, 953 F.Supp. 100 , 102 (S.D.N.Y.1997). As has been noted, Cole is not a beneficiary of the Plan. Rather, he is an assign-ee. … V.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Billings

    225 F. 90 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 3, 1914

    Assuming, however, that the board erred in excluding Mr. Lewis, it by no means follows that the petitioner is entitled to the relief prayed for. … Holmes, J., United States v. Sing Tuck, 194 U. S. 161, 170 , 24 Sup. Ct. 621, 48 L. Ed. 917 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • West Street Group LLC v. Epro

    564 F. Supp. 2d 84 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 10, 2008

    See Welch v. Paicos, 66 F.Supp.2d 138, 165-66 (D.Mass.1999) (Garrity, J.). 58 . See, e.g., Britton v. … v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Emerson College

    271 F. Supp. 3d 337 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2017

    Wills v. Brown Univ., 184 F.3d 20, 26 (1st Cir. 1999). However, if earlier measures have proved inadequate to prevent further harassment, a school “may be-required to..take further steps to avoid new liability.” Id. … Wills v. Brown Univ., 184 F.3d at 26 . Here, the undisputed facts in the.record demonstrate that Emerson’s response to Doe’s allegations was timely and reasonable.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fitzgerald v. Town of Kingston

    13 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 25, 1998

    See also Chongris *125 v. Board of Appeals of Andover, 811 F.2d at 38, 42 (1st Cir.) … Chongris v. Board of Appeals of Andover, 811 F.2d 36, 44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1021 , 107 S.Ct. 3266 , 97 L.Ed.2d 765 (1987). 8 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Vanderbilt v. Town of Chilmark

    174 F.R.D. 225 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 18, 1997

    See, e.g., Hancock v. Hobbs, 967 F.2d 462, 467 (11th Cir.1992); Hancock v. … See Sax v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Golden v. Popper Shoe Corp.

    94 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 17, 1950

    Louis Wentham H H Brown women’s shoes @ $2.00 net per pair. The name Robert’s Shoes, Boston, Mass, is not to be used. These shoes to be advertised as some discontinued styles. (Sgd) V. J. … Freedman, 274 Mass. 558, 563 , 175 N.E. 55 ; Hodgens v. Sullivan, 209 Mass. 533, 538 , 95 N.E. 969 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Karger v. Sigler

    384 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 24, 1974

    guarantees of Morrissey v. … Wolff v. McDonnell. 1974, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • New Bedford Marine Rescue, Inc. v. Cape Jeweler's Inc.

    240 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 21, 2003

    See Ocean Services Towing and Salvage, Inc. v. Brown, 810 F.Supp. 1258, 1263 (S.D.Fla.1993). … H.R.M., Inc. v. S/V Venture VII, 972 F.Supp. 92, 96 (D.R.I.1997).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Northeast Airlines, Inc. v. World Airways, Inc.

    262 F. Supp. 316 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 30, 1966

    (“World”) from violating certain rules of the Civil Aeronautics Board (“Board”) while operating a charter flight program. … Lynch v. Lyons, 1938, 303 Mass. 116, 117, 119 , 20 N.E.2d 953 . Lahr v. Adell Chemical Co., 1 Cir., 1962, 300 F.2d 256 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • The Susan

    23 F. Cas. 440 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1859

    The cases Lea v. The Alexander [Case No. S,153], and Callagan v. Hallett, 1 Caines. 104, were decided not upon the general law, but upon the positive enactments of a New York statute. … That the salvors have no right to act against the will of the master, see Clark v. The Dodge Healey [Case Ño. 2.849]; The Bee [Id. 1,219].

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Barnes v. Duffy

    396 F. Supp. 166 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 31, 1974

    Compare Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Foster Wheeler Corp., 173 U.S.P.Q. 480 , 481, 483-84 (D.N.J.1972), with Lomax v. Kihara v. VanDerOhe, 175 U.S.P.Q. 538 (D.D.C.1972). … But see Frilette v. Kimberlin, 508 F.2d 205 (3rd Cir. 1974), and Duffy v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Linn v. Andover Newton Theological School

    642 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 7, 1985

    Leite v. … V.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hanovia Chemical & Mfg. Co. v. David Buttrick Co.

    39 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 2, 1941

    The flow-board of this device was 20% inches long and 18% inches wide and the top edge of the flow-board, which formed a weir between the baffle and the flow-board, was % of an inch thick. … Detrola Radio & Television Corp. v. Hazeltine Corp., May 12, 1941, 61 S.Ct. 948 , 85 L.Ed.-; Hailes et al. v. Van Wormer et al., 20 Wall. 353 , 87 U.S. 353 , 22 L.Ed. 241, 249 ; Grosjean et al. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Anderson v. Chamberlain

    134 F. Supp. 2d 156 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 14, 2001

    On or about August 11, 1997, plaintiff submitted an application to the the Board of Health of the Town of Groveland (“the board”). … Montgomery v. Carter County, Tennessee, 226 F.3d at 765 . Defendants’ jurisdictional argument focuses on the former holding based on the non-finality of the board’s decision.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Boston Five Cents Saving Bank v. Pierce

    601 F. Supp. 38 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 26, 1984

    The familiar criteria of Hahn v. … The owner’s "chain of title" is as follows: The Kenmore Square Apartment Company, a general partnership, Harold Brown, Harbro, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation wholly owned by Harold Brown, and Kenmore Tower Corporation

    Vacated by The Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 768 F.2d 5 (1985)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sachs v. Sprague

    401 F. Supp. 2d 159 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 22, 2005

    See Landy v. D’Alessandro, 316 F.Supp.2d 49, 57 (D.Mass.2004). In Rales v. … See Guttman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cellco Partnership v. Town of Douglas

    81 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 28, 1999

    Co. v. Town of Oyster Bay, 166 F.3d 490, 494-97 (2d Cir.1999). … See Virginia Metronet, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors, 984 F.Supp. 966, 970 (E.D.Va.1998). In that event, the regulation is unlawful under the statute’s “effect” provision.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.