Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,281 results
1.23s
Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. Monahan
57 F.2d 217 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 11, 1932
Crowell v. Benson, 52 S. Ct. 285 , 76 L. Ed.-, decided February 23,1932. … Koch v. Lehigh Valley Ry. Co., 217 App. Div. 280 , 216 N. Y. S. 609; Id., 244 N. Y. 578 , 155 N. E. 904 , cited by the plaintiff, is distinguishable upon the facts.
Cited 0 timesPublished181 F. 875 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 31, 1909
Pratt v. Thomas, 1 Ware, 427 , Fed. Cas. No. 11,377; The Guiding Star (D. C.) l Fed. 347; Olsen v. Whitney (D. C.) 109 Fed. 80 ; 2 Parsons, Shipping and Admiralty, 374, 375. … The only alleged ground for the damage claim is the absence of “medicines” on board the vessel.
Cited 4 timesPublishedLykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. General Dynamics Corp.
512 F. Supp. 1266 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 1, 1981
General Dynamics v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Decision of Ronald Kiss (October 13,1978). Lykes filed a timely appeal with the Maritime Subsidy Board. … Rosenman Corporation v.
Cited 3 timesPublished638 F. Supp. 1019 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 2, 1986
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 571 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2706 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Johnson v. Chairman of New York State Board of Parole, 500 F.2d 925, 934 (2d Cir.), vacated as moot sub nom. Regan v.
Cited 11 timesPublished583 F. Supp. 1456 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 11, 1984
into the Lynn Harbor, resulting in Brown’s death. … E.g., United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedKonstantinakos v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
719 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 8, 1989
and Fredo without prior approval by the board of directors. … Count IV charges Wester, Fredo and the board of directors with negligence. Count V charges Wester, Fredo and the board of directors with breach of their fiduciary duty of care, in violation of M.G.L. ch. 156B, § 65.
Cited 23 timesPublishedHennebury v. Transport Workers Union of America, Local 507
485 F. Supp. 1319 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 7, 1980
designated by the bargaining agreement. 1 The Board’s jurisdiction is thus exclusive and primary. 406 U.S. at 325 , 92 S.Ct. at 1565 ; accord, Dorsey v. … See, e. g., Conrad v. Delta Airlines, 7 Cir. 1974, 494 F.2d 914 (plaintiff would have been permitted to circumvent adjustment board had he successfully demonstrated futility of administrative remedy) and Goglowski v.
Cited 4 timesPublished306 F. Supp. 1013 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 2, 1969
In scrutinizing the Board’s finding and ultimately the Army’s action, this Court is bound to rule in accordance with Bates v. Commander, First Coast Guard District, 1st Cir., 413 F.2d 475 and Nason v. … See Mahler v. Eby, 264 U.S. 32, 46 , 44 S.Ct. 283 , 68 L.Ed. 549 . So ordered.
Reversed on other grounds by Alan I. Silberberg v. Commanding Officer, Col. Albert W. Willis, 420 F.2d 662 (1970)Cited 17 timesPublished224 F. Supp. 3d 104 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 19, 2016
See, e.g., United States v. Brown, No. 03-cr-10067-RGS, Dkt # 202 (D. Mass. Oct. 14, 2016); United States v. Aponte, No. 11-cr-30018-MAP, 208 F.Supp.3d 347, 348-49 , 2016 WL 5338505, at *1 (D. Mass. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 2 Mass.App.Ct. 883, 883 , 318 N.E.2d 486 (1974).
Cited 4 timesPublished424 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 9, 1976
As Justice White noted in Wolff v. … In companion cases last spring, Meachum v.
Reversed on other grounds by Four Certain Unnamed Inmates of Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Walpole, Massachusetts v. Frank A. Hall, 550 F.2d 1291 (1977)Cited 2 timesPublished40 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 11, 1941
A., v. … A., v. The Navemar et al., supra; cf. Puente v. Spanish Nat. State, supra.
Cited 7 timesPublished574 F. Supp. 955 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 10, 1983
In Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. … See Massachusetts Board of Retirement v.
Reversed on other grounds by Mahoney v. Trabucco, 738 F.2d 35 (1984)Cited 6 timesPublished339 F. Supp. 366 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 1972
In Steele v. … In United States v.
Cited 2 timesPublished212 F. 275 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 18, 1913
He insists that the disease cannot in any way affect his ability to earn a living, and that the record returned here by the Immigration Commissioner shows that both the Board of Special Inquiry and the Revisory Board based … Holmes, J., Chin Yow v. United States, 208 U. S. 8 , 28 Sup. Ct. 201, 52 L. Ed. 369 . In United States v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 253 , 25 Sup. Ct. 644, 49 L.
Cited 6 timesPublished37 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 11, 1941
Old Colony Trust Co. v. … before the Board.
Cited 2 timesPublishedSouth Boston Allied War Veterans Council v. Zobel
830 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 11, 1993
Brown denied the Veterans Council’s petition, holding that the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion in granting the preliminary injunction. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian & Bisexual Group of Boston, et al., v. … See New York County Board of Ancient Order of Hibernians v. David Dinkins, et al., 814 F.Supp. 358 , 368-72 (S.D.N.Y.1993); see also Shuttlesworth v.
Cited 4 timesPublished655 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 21, 1986
Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). However, the jury awarded Mr. … Lamphere v. Brown University, 610 F.2d 46 , 47 n. 2 (1st Cir.1979). 3 . As will be discussed in greater detail below, see section II.B.1., infra, the court also concludes that Mr.
Cited 6 timesPublishedShaner v. Chase Bank, USA, N.A.
570 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 8, 2008
See Swanson v. Bank of Am., N.A., 566 F.Supp.2d 821 , 2008 WL 2738083, at *3-5 (N.D.Ill.2008); McCoy v. Chase Manhattan Bank USA, SACV 06-107-JVS (C.D.Cal. … Ford v.
Cited 6 timesPublished746 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 16, 1990
Confiscated from Maling's belongings were one plastic bag containing greenish brown vegetation and one plastic bag containing sixteen white tablets and five brown tablets. … In Rakas v.
Cited 1 timesPublished531 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 1982
Nor is it to assume the role of a “super-zoning board.” Sixth Camden Corp. v. Evesham, D.C.N.J.1976, 420 F.Supp. 709 ; Steel Hill Development, Inc. v. … The actions of local zoning boards are entitled to a presumption of validity. South Gwinnett v.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna