Case law

Roslindale Cooperative Bank v. Greenwald

481 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 7, 1979

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341, 345-46 , 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Paul v. Davis, supra, 424 U.S. at 701 — 12, 96 S.Ct. 1155 . With respect to Central Bank and its directors, the complaint fails for an additional reason.

Big Y Supermarkets, Inc. v. McCulloch

263 F. Supp. 175 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 1967

of striking down an order of the Board, thereby seeking to embrace the principle of Leedom v. … S. at p. 479, 84 S.Ct. 894 , (2) there has been no plain violation by the Board of an “unambiguous and mandatory” provision of the Act, Boire v.

Grossman v. Johnson

2 Mass. Supp. 392 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 7, 1981

In Parish v. … See, e.g., Lewis v. Anderson, 615 F. 2d 778, 781 (9th Cir. 1979); Abbey v.

Arthurs v. Stern

427 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 3, 1977

In United States v. … Relying upon Palmigiano v.

Associated General Contractors of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Boston District Council of Carpenters

599 F. Supp. 1560 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 3, 1985

For this reason the cases cited by plaintiffs, beginning with Carey v. … Associated General Contractors v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, 9 Cir.1976, 529 F.2d 1395 , 1397 (“AGC v. Local 701 ”).

The Belfast

226 F. 362 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 1914

Brown, J., The Georgia, supra. f liud and rule that the Wayne was violating both Act Cong, of March 3, 1899, § 15 ( 30 Stat. 1152 ), and the rules and regulations of tire harbor master of the port of Boston (regulation 8) … Nobody on board the Belfast became aware of any obscuring vapor until just about the time -when the searchlight was turned on and the Cassie was discovered.

Adams v. United States

281 F. 895 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 29, 1922

Board. … S. v. Thompson) (Jan. 3, 1922) 257 U. S. 419 , 42 Sup. Ct. 159, 66 L. Ed.-, leaves, I think, not much room for doubt on that point.

Mitchell v. Kelley

910 F. Supp. 2d 343 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 17, 2012

Sholley v. Town of Holliston, 49 F.Supp.2d 14, 18 (D.Mass.1999). … See Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 326 , 103 S.Ct. 1108 , 75 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983); Kyricopoulos v. Orleans, 967 F.2d 14 (1st Cir.1992).

Doe v. United States Attorney General

657 F. Supp. 2d 315 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 2009

See Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board, No. 06-P-368, 68 Mass.App.Ct. 1114 , 2007 WL 895859 (Mass.App.Ct. Mar. 26, 2007). … See Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Med., 444 Mass. 837, 843 , 832 N.E.2d 628 (2005).

Joe Hand Promotions v. Sorel

843 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 4, 2012

Brown, an attorney, “had always represented him” while he owned the 252 Lounge, Inc. The motion asserts that Mr. … See Krause v.

Greene v. United Packinghouse Food & Allied Workers

199 F. Supp. 713 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 4, 1961

Greene, Acting Regional Director of the First Region of the National Labor Relations Board (herein called the Board), for a temporary injunction pursuant to Section 10(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (herein … Petitioner is Acting Regional Director of the First Region of the Board, an agency of the United States, and filed the petition herein for and on behalf of the Board. 2.

Cleary v. American Capital, Ltd.

59 F. Supp. 3d 249 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 14, 2014

See Pearson v. Component Tech. Corp., 247 F.3d 471, 491 (3rd Cir.2001); Administaff Cos. v. … Attorney Gen. v.

Phantom Ventures LLC v. Depriest

240 F. Supp. 3d 239 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 7, 2017

Board. … Ayotte v.

Downie v. Heckler

628 F. Supp. 963 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 27, 1986

Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 647 F.2d 218, 222 (1st Cir.1981). … Goodermote v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 690 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.1982). If he is, then he will not be found disabled regardless of his medical condition at the time. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 (b).

Feldstein v. Christian Science Monitor

555 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 1983

Van Schaick v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 535 F.Supp. 1125, 1144 (D.Mass.1982) quoting Founding Church of Scientology v. United States, 409 F.2d 1146, 1160 (D.C.Cir. 1969). … Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 485 F.Supp. 255, 260 (N.D.Tex. 1980); see King’s Garden, Inc. v.

Armsden v. Cataldo

315 F. Supp. 129 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 22, 1970

Eisen v. Eastman, 421 F.2d 560 (1969). … Commuters Assoc, v. Levitt, 405 F.2d 1148, 1150-1151 (2 Cir., 1969); Potwora v. Dillon, 386 F.2d 74, 77 (2 Cir., 1967); Smith v. Bd. of Commissioners, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 85 , 380 F.2d 632, 637-638 (1967); Bonner v.

United States v. Mathews

327 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 16, 1971

The reference in Nestor v. … Walsh v. Local Board, S.D.N.Y., 1969, 305 F.Supp. 1274, 1278 .

Hunt v. Colburn

12 F. Cas. 905 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1853

He offered to go on board, and work his passage to Boston. But the captain refusing, told him be would not have him come on board again; but if he wanted his clothes, to come down again in a pilot-boat for them. … See Sheffield v. Page [Case No. 12,743].

Massachusetts Ex Rel. Department of Public Welfare v. United States

737 F. Supp. 120 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 27, 1990

Mayburg v. … E.g., Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 , 85 S.Ct. 792, 801 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); cf. Wilcox v.

Mailloux v. Town of Littleton

473 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 11, 2007

But McCurdy never recommended Plaintiff to the Board for the next available full-time firefighter position. Plaintiffs claim appears similar to the circumstances of the plaintiff in McAndrew v. … See Hurley v.