Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmad

6,281 results

1.54s

  • Cell Genesys, Inc. v. Applied Research Systems ARS Holding, N.V.

    499 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 13, 2007

    See Mazzari v. … See also Aqua-Chem, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dos Reis ex rel. Camara v. Nicolls

    68 F. Supp. 773 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 15, 1946

    Marslin v. Schmucker, 4 Cir., 89 F.2d 765 ; Colyer v. Skeffington, D.C., 265 F. 17, 19 ; Ex parte Koerner, 9 Cir., 176 F. 478 ; Lavin v. LeFevre, 9 Cir., 125 F. 693 . … Taking into consideration the fact that in Perkins v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McCarthy v. Commerce Group, Inc.

    831 F. Supp. 2d 459 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 16, 2011

    Bard v. … Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Najas Realty, LLC v. Seekonk Water District

    68 F. Supp. 3d 246 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 23, 2014

    See Clark v. … See Hunt v. Massi, 773 F.3d 361, 367 (1st Cir.2014) (quoting Ford v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Perkins v. City of Attleboro

    969 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 17, 2013

    See also Board of Regents v. … See also Brown v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Rapid Pharmaceuticals AG v. Kachroo

    180 F. Supp. 3d 96 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 23, 2015

    In Goldhammer v. … See, e.g., Ryan v. Johnson, 115 F.3d 193, 196 (3d Cir.1997).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. City of Cambridge

    246 F. Supp. 2d 118 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 28, 2003

    Tenon of Amherst v. Omnipoint Communications Enters., Inc., 178 F.3d 9 , 13 (1st Cir.1999). 1. The Board’s Decision Was Supported By. … Sprint Spectrum, L.P. v. Willoth, 176 F.3d 630, 638 (2d Cir.1999) (citing AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of Virginia Beach, 155 F.3d 423, 427 (4th Cir.1998)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Joyce

    212 F. 285 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 12, 1913

    The later boards apparently rehear and determine such cases on the merits. … of'habeas corpus must be allowed, and the writ must issue. [2] After the writ has been issued and served and Joyce is in the custody of this court for a rehearing of the case, in accordance with the decision in Chin Yow v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kimball v. Town of Provincetown

    158 F. Supp. 3d 7 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 26, 2016

    See Brown v. Sweeney, 526 F.Supp.2d 126, 132-33 (D.Mass.2007). The Plaintiffs allege they were unreasonably seized.' … Brown, 526 F.Supp.2d at 132 (internal citation omitted).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ranalli v. Ferrari (In Re Unifi Communications, Inc.)

    317 B.R. 13 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 21, 2004

    Corp. v. MNVA R.R., Inc., 212 F.3d 1076 (8th Cir.2000) (suit by judgment creditor against board); Bank of Am. v. … Pathe Communications Corp., 1991 WL 277613 (Del.Ch.1991) (dispute between third parties over membership of corporate board); Geyer v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Industrial General Corp. v. Sequoia Pacific Systems Corp.

    849 F. Supp. 820 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 11, 1994

    Doliner v. Brown, 21 Mass.App.Ct. 692, 697 , 489 N.E.2d 1036 (1986). Because I agree with the jury that Sequoia acted unfairly, I will award Plastek damages in the amount of the unpaid invoices. … Brown v. Gerstein, 17 Mass.App.Ct. 558, 569-571 , 460 N.E.2d 1043 (1984). 8 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Goldman Sachs & Co.

    949 F. Supp. 2d 298 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 11, 2013

    On December 20, Goldman met again with the plaintiffs and Dragon Board of Directors. At the meeting, the Dragon Board agreed to enter into a period of exclusivity with Visteon. … (citing Golber v. BayBank Valley Trust Co., 46 Mass.App.Ct. 256, 259-60 , 704 N.E.2d 1191 (1999); Glickman v. Brown, 21 Mass.App.Ct. 229, 230-33 , 486 N.E.2d 737 (1985)). 1.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Papa Gino's of America, Inc. v. Taurasi

    616 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 14, 1984

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Medina v. Rudman, 545 F.2d 244, 249-51 (1st Cir.1976); O’Neill v. Town of Nantucket, 545 F.Supp. 449, 452-53 (D.Mass.1982). … Hahn v. Sargent, 523 F.2d 461, 469 (1st Cir.1975); see also Landrigan v. City of Warwick, 628 F.2d 736 , 739 n. 1 (1st Cir. 1980) ; Harrison v. Brooks, 519 F.2d 1358 (1st Cir.1975).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Ashe

    106 F.R.D. 353 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 20, 1985

    First, defendants argue that this case is essentially the same case as Brown v. Ashe, No. 81-0280-F, which also involves conditions at the Jail and whose maintenance as a class action defendants will not contest. … Kamm v. California City Development Co., 509 F.2d 205, 211 (9th Cir.1975). The other answer to defendants’ first contention is that the Brown case is not the same as this case.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MAZ Partners LP v. Shear

    218 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 21, 2016

    See Tongue v. … Battaglia/Ira v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Morgan v. McDonough

    554 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 23, 1982

    See § V C 4. Wednesday, March 2, 1983 The State Board receives the request to intervene. … See § V D 2.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Koelsch v. Town of Amesbury

    851 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 17, 1994

    See generally Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) (“Roth”). … However, the Town followed the procedure recommended in Cleveland Board of Education v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Big Y Supermarkets, Inc. v. McCulloch

    263 F. Supp. 175 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 1967

    of striking down an order of the Board, thereby seeking to embrace the principle of Leedom v. … S. at p. 479, 84 S.Ct. 894 , (2) there has been no plain violation by the Board of an “unambiguous and mandatory” provision of the Act, Boire v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Town of Randolph

    193 F. Supp. 2d 311 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 2002

    Cellular Telephone Co. v. Board of Adjustment of Borough of Paramus, 37 F.Supp.2d 638, 645 (D.N.J.1999) (quoting Cotter v. Harris, 642 F.2d 700, 704 (3d Cir.1981)). … P’ship v. Penn Tp., 196 F.3d 469, 480 (3d Cir.1999)); 360° Communications Co. of Charlottesville v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Denton v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, Boilermakers Local 29

    653 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 28, 1986

    San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959). In fact, plaintiff initially brought an unfair labor charge before the NLRB, which the Board dismissed. Denton Dep. … Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 23-24 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2853-2854 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983); AVCO v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.