Case law

Lynch v. City of Boston

989 F. Supp. 275 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 9, 1997

Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, —U.S.-,-, 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); see also Monell v. Dept. of Social Servs., City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 694 , 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2037 , 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 575 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2708 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

United States v. Howe

144 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 25, 1956

United States v. Schwartz, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 143 F.Supp. 639 ; United States v. Scott, D.C.E.D. Wis., 137 F.Supp. 449 . … United States v. Steele, D.C., 142 F.Supp. 242, 246 .

Druker v. City of Boston

410 F. Supp. 1314 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 19, 1976

Lindsay, 303 F.Supp. 677 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Druker v. Sullivan, 322 F.Supp. 1126 (D.Mass.1971); Helmsley v. Borough of Fort Lee, 362 F.Supp. 581 (D.N.J.1973); Kargman v. … See Boston v. Secretary of HUD, C.A.No. 75-902-C (D.Mass.).

Gallant v. BOC Group, Inc.

886 F. Supp. 202 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 17, 1995

Gonzalez v. CNA Ins. … Brown v. Hammond, 810 F.Supp. 644, 646 (E.D.Pa.1993). Thus, an employee may have a cause of action where he is discharged for refusing to violate the law. See Clark v.

Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly

76 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 2, 1999

V. … Representatives, Inc. v.

Meehan v. New England School of Law

522 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 11, 1981

Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, supra, 101 S.Ct. at 1093 , citing Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. … See, e. g., Sweeney v. Board of Trustees of Keene State College, supra, 604 F.2d at 112; Huang v. College of the Holy Cross, supra, 436 F.Supp. at 653 ; EEOC v.

American S. S. Co. v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co.

42 F.2d 886 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 4, 1930

For, as said in Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co., 134 U. S. 530 , 10 S. Ct. 604 , 33 L. … Laws, c. 41), under which I conceive the cases of Benedict v. Ratner and Brown v.

Lowell v. Thompson

297 F. 536 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 1924

This Ponzi preference case is distinguished from Lowell v. Brown (D. C.) 280 Fed. 193 , affirmed on appeal (C. C. … See Hewitt v. Haye, 205 Mass. 356, 364 , 91 N. E. 332 , 137 Am. St. Rep. 448 .

Martineau v. Kurland

36 F. Supp. 2d 39 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 1999

Swain v. Spinney, 117 F.3d 1, 11 (1st Cir.1997) (quoting Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382, 1388 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968).

Keay v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

267 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 24, 1967

International Association of Machinists etc. v. Central Airlines Inc., 372 U.S. 682 , 83 S.Ct. 956 , 10 L.Ed.2d 67 . Under that Act there are provisions for boards of adjustment. … Inc. v.

O'NEILL v. Town of Nantucket

545 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 13, 1982

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970). … Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870, 874 (1st Cir. 1981). See also Perkins v. Board of Directors of School Administrative District No. 13, 686 F.2d 49 ,-(1st Cir. 1982).

United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America (UE) Amalgamated Local 259 v. Worthington Corp.

136 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 7, 1955

Similarly, the Board’s exclusive jurisdiction cannot be displaced by proceedings before a privately constituted arbitration board, N. L. R. B. v. International Union, 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 698, 702 ; N. L. R. B. v. … Inland Steel Co. v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 170 F.2d 247, 253 , 12 A.L.R.2d 240 . The determination of the validity of such a contention was a matter reserved in the first instance exclusively for the Board. Weber v.

Glover v. Lee, Higginson Corp.

95 F. Supp. 504 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 4, 1950

This is exemplified in Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 555 . … Davenport-Brown was ultimately adjudicated -bankrupt, and the plaintiff was not paid the sum owing to it.

D.H.L. Associates, Inc. v. O'Gorman

6 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 7, 1998

As a result of the decision in Bogan v. Scott-Harris, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 966 , — L.Ed.2d — — (1998), plaintiffs claims with respect to the legislative activities of the Board of Selectmen became unsupportable. … Introduction Under Renton v.

McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

862 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 31, 1994

In Buonocore v. … Evangelinos v. T.W.A, Inc., 550 F.2d 152, 154 (3rd Cir.1977).

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Massachusetts

680 F. Supp. 455 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 23, 1988

In Thompson v. … Apkin v.

Williams v. City of Brockton

59 F. Supp. 3d 228 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 13, 2014

Board 2 (collectively, the “Retirement Board Defendants”). … Therefore, summary judgment shall enter in favor of the Retirement Board Defendants with respect to Count TV of the complaint as well. V.

Zipwall, LLC v. Fastcap, LLC

482 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 9, 2007

WO 91/09556, the Brown reference; 44 and (3) a conclusory assertion that “the combination of Brown with the prior art dust barriers [including those constructed with plastic sheet and 2x4 boards] render Zipwall’s patent claims … See Kim v.

New Bedford Loomfixers' Union v. Alpert

110 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 2, 1953

National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corporation, 308 U.S. 453 , 60 S.Ct. 307 , 84 L.Ed. 396 ; American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 . … Mueller Brass Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 86 U.S. App.D.C. 153, 180 F.2d 402 .

Fuentes v. Hampden County Sheriff's Department

429 F. Supp. 2d 253 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2006

See Brown v. Armstrong, 957 F.Supp. 1293, 1305 (D.Mass.1996) (“Civil conspiracy is recognized as ‘a very limited cause of action in Massachusetts.’ ”) (quoting Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. … Now, as it turns out, Fuentes’ speech to both the male officer (“she can turn it into the union board”) and to Silva (a member of the union’s executive board) fell under the auspices of union, not personal, activity.