Case law

Bajwa v. Cobb

727 F. Supp. 53 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 18, 1989

STANDARDS OF REVIEW Factual determinations of the Board are reviewed under a substantial evidence standard while questions of law are reviewed de novo. Desir v. … V.

Thomas v. Town of Salisbury

277 F. Supp. 3d 161 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 30, 2017

All the factors lead to the conclusion that Thomas was acting as a police officer, and not a private citizen, when he submitted his letter to the Board of Selectmen. See Amirault v. … Ross v.

United States v. Steele

142 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 13, 1956

See also Cox v. U. … S. v. Hartman, 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 366 ; Reese v. U. S., 9 Cir., 225 F.2d 766 .

ER Holdings, Inc. v. Norton Co.

735 F. Supp. 1094 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 11, 1990

The corporate by-laws constitute a contract between the corporation’s owners — the shareholders — and its managers, the Board. Id.; Jessie v. Boynton, 372 Mass. 293, 303 , 361 N.E.2d 1267, 1273 (1977); Mitchell v. … Sage Co. v.

Biogen, Inc. v. SCHERING AG

954 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 4, 1996

See also Maryland Casualty Company v. … NeoRX v. Immunomedics, Inc., 877 F.Supp. 202, 207 (D.N.J.1994). See also Scripps Clinic & Research Found, v.

Meola v. Fitzpatrick

322 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 1971

Sostre v. Rockefeller, 312 F.Supp. at 872 . In Carothers v. … See Mass.G.L. e. 127, § 129; Gildea v. Com’r., 1957, 336 Mass. 48, 49 , 142 N.E. 2d 400 ; Lembersky v. Parole Board, 1955, 332 Mass. 290 , 294, 124 N.E.2d 521 , and Greenfield v. Scafati, D.

Cellco Partnership v. Town of Grafton, Mass.

336 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 29, 2004

Finally, in count V, Célico claims that the Board’s denial of the special permit was arbitrary and capricious, not based upon the evidence, and in excess of the Board’s authority under both Mass. Gen. … Co. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of Ho-Ho-Kus, 197 F.3d 64, 68-70 (3d Cir.1999); Sprint Spectrum L.P. v.

Executive Airlines, Inc. v. Air New England, Inc.

357 F. Supp. 345 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 2, 1973

The Civil Aeronautics Board’s primary jurisdiction of an antitrust complaint under 411 of the Act was fully discussed in Pan American Airways v. United States, 371 U.S. 296 , 83 S.Ct. 476 , 9 L.Ed.2d 325 (1963). … Hughes Tool Co. et al. v.

Worthington Pump & MacHinery Corp. v. Local No. 259 of the United Electrical Radio & MacHine Workers of America

63 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 29, 1945

The aforesaid case of Becker v. … Justice Murphy in United States v.

George S. Colton Elastic Web Co. v. White

16 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 14, 1936

The case of Backus v. … Board.

O'NEILL v. Town of Nantucket

545 F. Supp. 449 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 13, 1982

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970). … Beitzell v. Jeffrey, 643 F.2d 870, 874 (1st Cir. 1981). See also Perkins v. Board of Directors of School Administrative District No. 13, 686 F.2d 49 ,-(1st Cir. 1982).

Norris v. Moroney

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 8, 2022

White v. Gittens, 121 F.3d 803, 806 (1st Cir. 1997) (internal quotations omitted); see Heck v. … also Brown v. Rhode Island, 511 F.

Bell v. Streetwise Records, Ltd.

616 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 23, 1984

Wrist-Pocket Manufacturing Co. v. … ; Noone v. Banner Talent Associates, Inc., 398 F.Supp. 260, 263 (S.D.N.Y.1975); Distillers Brands v. American Distilling Co., 26 F.Supp. 988, 989 (S.D.N.Y.1938). In Kingsmen v.

Kelly v. Keystone Shipping Co.

281 F. Supp. 2d 313 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 14, 2003

See generally Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-302 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) (discussing circumstances under which regulations have the force and effect of law); Warder v. … A substantive or " 'legislative-type rule’ ” is "one 'affecting individual rights and obligations.’ " Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 301-302 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); see also Williams v.

Slattery v. Town of Framingham

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 9, 2020

The Retirement Board, however, informed Plaintiff that he would have to go before the Medical Review Board to prove that he was not disabled. Id. at ¶ 86-87. K. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 574 (1968).

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Cambridge

834 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 22, 2011

The Board’s Decision 1. Standard of Review A district court’s review of a board’s decision is not de novo. ATC Realty, LLC v. Town of Kingston, 303 F.3d 91, 95 (1st Cir.2002). … The Court’s review is confined to the record before the zoning board, ATC Realty, 303 F.3d at 95 , and must take into account evidence that supports and contradicts the board’s conclusions. Cellco P’ship v.

Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Town of Swansea

574 F. Supp. 2d 227 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 23, 2008

ATC Realty, LLC v. Town of Kingston, N.H., 303 F.3d 91, 94 (1st Cir.2002). See also Town of Amherst v. … See Keating v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988); United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir.1986); Park Motor Mart, Inc. v.

Dobelle v. Flynn

12 F. Supp. 3d 274 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 9, 2014

See Carter v. … See King v.

Fuentes v. Hampden County Sheriff's Department

429 F. Supp. 2d 253 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2006

See Brown v. Armstrong, 957 F.Supp. 1293, 1305 (D.Mass.1996) (“Civil conspiracy is recognized as ‘a very limited cause of action in Massachusetts.’ ”) (quoting Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. … Now, as it turns out, Fuentes’ speech to both the male officer (“she can turn it into the union board”) and to Silva (a member of the union’s executive board) fell under the auspices of union, not personal, activity.

St. Luke's Hospital v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

632 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1986

Mary) (Board has authority to review self-disallowed costs); Community Hospital of Roanoke Valley v. … Lafayette Home Hospital v.