Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmad

3,024 results

0.65s

  • Hilchey v. City of Haverhill

    537 F. Supp. 2d 255 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 1, 2008

    Before asking the second question, however, the issue of qualified immunity must be addressed. D. Qualified Immunity 1. … Second, the Court must determine whether the right was “clearly established at the time of the alleged violation”. Abrew-Guzman, 241 F.3d at 73 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Garvey v. MacDonald

    665 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 22, 2009

    To summarize, courts in strip-search cases follow the familiar three-part qualified immunity inquiry: (1) have the plaintiffs alleged a deprivation of an actual constitutional right; (2) was the right clearly established … Accordingly, the measuring date of August 4, 2008, is firmly established for qualified immunity purposes here.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pepe

    42 F. Supp. 3d 310 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 8, 2014

    any of Brown’s “clearly established” constitutional rights. … Qualified immunity attaches to discretionary conduct of government officials that “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Vacca v. Barletta

    753 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 12, 1990

    Qualified Immunity Government officials who are not granted absolute immunity are entitled to qualified immunity from suit. … law, but whether that law was clearly established at the time an action occurred....

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Riverdale Mills Corp. v. United States

    337 F. Supp. 2d 247 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 16, 2004

    In evaluating a claim for qualified immunity, a court must determine: 1) whether the plaintiffs allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation, 2) whether the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged … The answer to each inquiry must be affirmative to overcome a defense of qualified immunity. Id. The Court is underwhelmed by defendants’ arguments that they are entitled to qualified immunity.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Opalenik v. LaBrie

    945 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 2013

    As Magistrate Judge Judith Dein explained: Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … rules that were clearly established at the time it was taken.”

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Howes v. Hitchcock

    66 F. Supp. 2d 203 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 9, 1999

    conduct violated clearly established law.” … To prevail on their qualified immunity defense, the officers must first establish that a prudent police officer with the information they collectively possessed reasonably could have believed that probable cause to arrest

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hunt v. Massi

    5 F. Supp. 3d 160 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 25, 2014

    Overview of Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects public officials from civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , as long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights which … The Right was Clearly Established.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Spencer v. Roche

    755 F. Supp. 2d 250 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 8, 2010

    Qualified Immunity Defendant VHS contends that its nurse employees are entitled to qualified immunity for their actions, and that it cannot be liable under a theory of vicarious or supervisory liability for actions that are … Defendants Roche and Morris do not assert qualified immunity as a defense on summary judgment. 13 .

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Doyle v. Dukakis

    699 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 4, 1988

    Qualified Immunity. The Court need not rest its decision on such a broad determination, however, in light of the qualified immunity from suit available to these defendants. In Harlow v. … The Supreme Court wrote that if a judge, on summary judgment, determines that “the law was clearly established at the time an action occurred, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail since a reasonably competent public

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carroll v. City of Quincy

    441 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 9, 2006

    Under the doctrine of qualified immunity: government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … The defendants are entitled to qualified immunity unless: 1) the plaintiff’s allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation, 2) the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation and 3) a similarly

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gonsalves v. City of New Bedford

    939 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 1, 1996

    Qualified Immunity As I indicated earlier, I also find that the plaintiff has proven that the defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity for their intentional cover-up in the circumstances of this case. … City of Laconia, the requirement that the federal right at issue must be clearly established does not mean that a government official has qualified immunity “‘unless the very action in question has previously been held to

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Hudson v. Spencer

    180 F. Supp. 3d 70 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 25, 2015

    Qualified immunity Qualified immunity protects state officials against § 1983 suits for damages if them conduct did “not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have … To determine whether qualified immunity applies, the court must decide 1) whether the official violated the plaintiffs constitutional right and 2) whether that right was clearly established at the time of the violation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Strachan v. Ashe

    548 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 13, 1982

    of a *1198 defense based upon qualified good faith immunity. … description of qualified immunity set forth in Scheuer v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • DeMayo v. Nugent

    475 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 21, 2007

    As a result of not finding the constitutional right at stake “clearly established,” this Court is not compelled to reach the third prong of qualified immunity. … a “clearly established” rule.

    Reversed on other grounds by DeMayo v. Nugent, 517 F.3d 11 (2008)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shaheed-Muhammad v. Dipaolo

    393 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2005

    violated that clearly established constitutional right. … Silvia, 32 Mass.App.Ct. 271, 273 , 588 N.E.2d 711 (1992) (to defeat defense of qualified immunity under the Civil Rights Act, plaintiff was “obliged to show that the defendants deprived her of a ‘clearly established’ right

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Nolan v. Krajcik

    384 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 12, 2005

    Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … Instead, the court determined that the defendant police officers were shielded by qualified immunity because no such constitutional right was clearly established until the Supreme Court decided Wilson v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Blake v. Berman

    598 F. Supp. 1081 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 11, 1984

    Defendants also contend that plaintiff’s claim for damages is foreclosed by defendants’ qualified immunity. … right was not clearly established at the time of plaintiff’s transfer to Leavenworth seems dubious at best.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Baggett v. Ashe

    41 F. Supp. 3d 113 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 26, 2014

    not be shielded by qualified immunity. … Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects officials performing discretionary functions when their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable officer should have

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McGunigle v. City of Quincy

    944 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 16, 2013

    Qualified Immunity Finally, the individual Defendants move for dismissal based on qualified immunity. The Supreme Court has articulated a two-step procedure for determining qualified immunity. … employee-speech law requires a fact-intensive balancing test, “it can rarely be considered ‘clearly established’ for purposes of qualified immunity.” 87 Yet, without more information, the court cannot determine whether this

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.