Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,024 results
0.65s
537 F. Supp. 2d 255 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 1, 2008
Before asking the second question, however, the issue of qualified immunity must be addressed. D. Qualified Immunity 1. … Second, the Court must determine whether the right was “clearly established at the time of the alleged violation”. Abrew-Guzman, 241 F.3d at 73 .
Cited 3 timesPublished665 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 22, 2009
To summarize, courts in strip-search cases follow the familiar three-part qualified immunity inquiry: (1) have the plaintiffs alleged a deprivation of an actual constitutional right; (2) was the right clearly established … Accordingly, the measuring date of August 4, 2008, is firmly established for qualified immunity purposes here.
Cited 0 timesPublished42 F. Supp. 3d 310 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 8, 2014
any of Brown’s “clearly established” constitutional rights. … Qualified immunity attaches to discretionary conduct of government officials that “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v.
Cited 1 timesPublished753 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 12, 1990
Qualified Immunity Government officials who are not granted absolute immunity are entitled to qualified immunity from suit. … law, but whether that law was clearly established at the time an action occurred....
Cited 2 timesPublishedRiverdale Mills Corp. v. United States
337 F. Supp. 2d 247 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 16, 2004
In evaluating a claim for qualified immunity, a court must determine: 1) whether the plaintiffs allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation, 2) whether the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged … The answer to each inquiry must be affirmative to overcome a defense of qualified immunity. Id. The Court is underwhelmed by defendants’ arguments that they are entitled to qualified immunity.
Cited 1 timesPublished945 F. Supp. 2d 168 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 2013
As Magistrate Judge Judith Dein explained: Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … rules that were clearly established at the time it was taken.”
Cited 9 timesPublished66 F. Supp. 2d 203 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 9, 1999
conduct violated clearly established law.” … To prevail on their qualified immunity defense, the officers must first establish that a prudent police officer with the information they collectively possessed reasonably could have believed that probable cause to arrest
Cited 11 timesPublished5 F. Supp. 3d 160 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 25, 2014
Overview of Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects public officials from civil liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , as long as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights which … The Right was Clearly Established.
Cited 1 timesPublished755 F. Supp. 2d 250 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 8, 2010
Qualified Immunity Defendant VHS contends that its nurse employees are entitled to qualified immunity for their actions, and that it cannot be liable under a theory of vicarious or supervisory liability for actions that are … Defendants Roche and Morris do not assert qualified immunity as a defense on summary judgment. 13 .
Cited 26 timesPublished699 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 4, 1988
Qualified Immunity. The Court need not rest its decision on such a broad determination, however, in light of the qualified immunity from suit available to these defendants. In Harlow v. … The Supreme Court wrote that if a judge, on summary judgment, determines that “the law was clearly established at the time an action occurred, the immunity defense ordinarily should fail since a reasonably competent public
Cited 0 timesPublished441 F. Supp. 2d 215 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 9, 2006
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity: government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory … The defendants are entitled to qualified immunity unless: 1) the plaintiff’s allegations, if true, establish a constitutional violation, 2) the right was clearly established at the time of the alleged violation and 3) a similarly
Cited 10 timesPublishedGonsalves v. City of New Bedford
939 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 1, 1996
Qualified Immunity As I indicated earlier, I also find that the plaintiff has proven that the defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity for their intentional cover-up in the circumstances of this case. … City of Laconia, the requirement that the federal right at issue must be clearly established does not mean that a government official has qualified immunity “‘unless the very action in question has previously been held to
Cited 14 timesPublished180 F. Supp. 3d 70 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 25, 2015
Qualified immunity Qualified immunity protects state officials against § 1983 suits for damages if them conduct did “not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have … To determine whether qualified immunity applies, the court must decide 1) whether the official violated the plaintiffs constitutional right and 2) whether that right was clearly established at the time of the violation.
Cited 2 timesPublished548 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 13, 1982
of a *1198 defense based upon qualified good faith immunity. … description of qualified immunity set forth in Scheuer v.
Cited 17 timesPublished475 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 21, 2007
As a result of not finding the constitutional right at stake “clearly established,” this Court is not compelled to reach the third prong of qualified immunity. … a “clearly established” rule.
Reversed on other grounds by DeMayo v. Nugent, 517 F.3d 11 (2008)Cited 2 timesPublished393 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 2005
violated that clearly established constitutional right. … Silvia, 32 Mass.App.Ct. 271, 273 , 588 N.E.2d 711 (1992) (to defeat defense of qualified immunity under the Civil Rights Act, plaintiff was “obliged to show that the defendants deprived her of a ‘clearly established’ right
Cited 20 timesPublished384 F. Supp. 2d 447 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 12, 2005
Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions from liability for civil damages when “their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … Instead, the court determined that the defendant police officers were shielded by qualified immunity because no such constitutional right was clearly established until the Supreme Court decided Wilson v.
Cited 9 timesPublished598 F. Supp. 1081 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 11, 1984
Defendants also contend that plaintiff’s claim for damages is foreclosed by defendants’ qualified immunity. … right was not clearly established at the time of plaintiff’s transfer to Leavenworth seems dubious at best.
Cited 3 timesPublished41 F. Supp. 3d 113 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 26, 2014
not be shielded by qualified immunity. … Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity protects officials performing discretionary functions when their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable officer should have
Cited 3 timesPublished944 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 16, 2013
Qualified Immunity Finally, the individual Defendants move for dismissal based on qualified immunity. The Supreme Court has articulated a two-step procedure for determining qualified immunity. … employee-speech law requires a fact-intensive balancing test, “it can rarely be considered ‘clearly established’ for purposes of qualified immunity.” 87 Yet, without more information, the court cannot determine whether this
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna