Case law

Kennedy v. Maginnis

393 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 7, 1975

United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141, 143 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954). Accord, Hall v. United States, 451 F.2d 353 (1st Cir. 1971). … Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954) is misplaced.

Estock v. City of Westfield

806 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 26, 2011

See Noonan v. … (“Board”) to the Massachusetts district court.

Campiti v. Walonis

453 F. Supp. 819 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1978

After arriving at Walpole, he met with Gunther and Brown in Gunther’s office. … As the Supreme Court stated in United States v.

O'HARA v. Menino

253 F. Supp. 2d 147 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2003

Co. v. … See Roy v.

Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

995 F. Supp. 190 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 26, 1998

—Dallas 1982) (an arbitration before the employer’s Board of Trustees would be “totally inconsistent with the theory of arbitration”); Cross & Brown Co. v. … at the pleasure of the Board of Directors....

Industrial Tower & Wireless, LLC v. Haddad

109 F. Supp. 3d 284 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 18, 2015

LLC v. … Member Cool also attended the Board meeting on July 17 as a non-voting member {Id. p. 10], .In T-Mobile South, LLC v.

Town of Norwood v. Adams-Russell Co., Inc.

627 F. Supp. 742 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 6, 1986

Franchise Tax Board v. Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … For example, in Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, App.

Greene v. Local 275, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers

200 F. Supp. 596 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 5, 1962

Greene, Acting Regional Director of the First Region of the National Labor Relations Board (herein called the Board) for a temporary injunction pursuant to Section 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended (herein … Petitioner is Acting Regional Director of the First Region of the Board, an agency of the United States, and filed the petition herein for and on behalf of the Board. 2.

Manufacturers' Finance Corp. v. Vye-Neill Co.

46 F.2d 146 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 15, 1930

See Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Johnson, 264 U. S. 1, 10 , 44 S. Ct. 232 , 68 L. Ed. 533 . … A.) 276 F. 704 ; Brown v. Four-In-One Coal Co. (C. C. A.) 286 F. 512 .

The Edwin

8 F. Cas. 358 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 15, 1859

In [Vanderwater v. Mills] 19 How. [60 U. S.] 90, it is said: “The obligation is mutual and reciprocal. … The cases of Morewood v. Pollok, 1 El. & Bl. 743, and Salmon Falls Manuf’g Co. v.

Druker v. Sullivan

334 F. Supp. 861 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 24, 1971

Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Control Board of Brookline, 1971 Mass.Adv.Sh. 161, 176, 266 N.E.2d 876, 888 . … See Marshal House, Inc. v. Rent Board of Brookline, supra, at 171 , 266 N.E.2d 876 ; Druker v. Sullivan, supra, 322 F.Supp. at 1127-1128 .

Johnson & Higgins v. Harper Transp. Co.

228 F. 730 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 13, 1915

Seamore v. Warren, 179 N. Y. 1 , 71 N. E. 260 . The law of Massachusetts is, of course, different from that of New York on the point under discussion. Browne on Statute of Erauds (5th Ed.) § 39 et seq. … Chaplin v. Hicks [1911] 2 K. B. 786; Richardson v. Hellish, 2 Bingham, 229; Neal v. Jefferson, 212 *744 Mass. 517 , 99 N. E. 334 , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 387, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 205; Speirs v.

Interface Group, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port Authority

631 F. Supp. 483 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 1986

Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). In Parker v. … State Board of Elections, 393 U.S. 544 , 89 S.Ct. 817 , 22 L.Ed.2d 1 (1969) (“[N]o person shall be denied the right to vote .. .” — 42 *494 U.S.C. § 1973c); Sullivan v.

Patterson v. Omnipoint Communications, Inc.

122 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 21, 2000

v. … See Lucas v. Planning Bd. of Town of LaGrange, 7 F.Supp.2d 310 (S.D.N.Y.1998). In Lucas, the zoning board initially denied a permit to build a tower. The applicant then sued the zoning board for TCA violations.

McPhail v. Williams

41 F. 61 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 7, 1890

It was decided by Judge Brown in The Amos D. Carver, 35 Fed. Rep. 665, that this statute has no application to the personal contracts of ship-owners. … In Judge Brown’s conclusion, that the act does not extend to contracts entered into personally by the owner, I fully concur. In Butler v. *62 Steam-Ship Co., 130 U. S. 527, 554 , 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 612, Mr.

Druker v. Sullivan

322 F. Supp. 1126 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 2, 1971

In Florida Lime and Avocado Growers v. … See Stoneridge Apts., Company v. Lindsay, 1969, S.D.N.Y., 303 F.Supp. 677 .

Sentinel Products Corp. v. Scriptoria, N.V.

124 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 30, 2000

Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 479 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989)). … See, e.g., Sheehy v.

Levitt v. Johnson

222 F. Supp. 805 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 21, 1963

The stockholders cannot, by resolution or otherwise, require the Fund or its Board of Directors to bring an action. … This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the complaint. 15 U.S.C. § 80a-43; Brown v. Bullock, 2nd Cir., 294 F.2d 415 . II. Plaintiff has capacity to bring this action.

United States v. Goodrich

183 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 29, 2001

See United States v. Pimental, 645 F.2d 85, 86 (1st Cir.1981) (applying Brown factors to connection between photo of car and illegal detention); United States v. … Thompson, 35 F.3d 100, 105 (2d Cir.1994)(applying Brown to statements made a month after illegal detention); United States v.

National Tower, LLC v. Frey

164 F. Supp. 2d 185 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 12, 2001

Although a local zoning board does not bear the burden of proving that a suitable alternative site in fact exists, Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc. v. … Omnipoint Communications v. Town of Lincoln, 107 F.Supp.2d at 116 .