Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmad

3,024 results

1.38s

  • Wisher v. Coverdell

    782 F. Supp. 703 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 27, 1992

    The program was established by the United Nations General Assembly in December 1970, maintains its headquarters in Geneva, and is administered by the United Nations Development Program (“UNDP”). … A waiver of the government’s sovereign immunity must be unequivocally expressed and not impliéd. See Library of Congress v. Shaw, 478 U.S. 310 , 106 S.Ct. 2957 , 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States Ex Rel. LaValley v. First National Bank of Boston

    707 F. Supp. 1351 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 23, 1988

    The portion of Amendment 2701 establishing the jurisdictional bar was ultimately enacted into law, with one minor amendment. … The court stated, As we have established in New England Power, ...

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • St. John's Nursing Home, Inc. v. City of New Bedford (In Re St. John's Nursing Home, Inc.)

    169 B.R. 795 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 19, 1994

    Nowhere does the statute so qualify the type of tax refunds under contemplation, however. … Dalm, 494 U.S. 596 , 110 S.Ct. 1361 , 108 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), where the Supreme Court has recently stated: Under settled principles of sovereign immunity, “the United States, as sovereign, 'is immune from suit, save as it

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Chan v. Cirilli

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 22, 2022

    right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct.” … “If either of the two prongs is not met—i.e., if the facts do not show a constitutional violation or the right in question was not clearly established—the officer is immune.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grigalauskas v. United States

    103 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 3, 1951

    This case is clearly not the usual type of action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2671 , et seq. … If, on the other hand, the defense of “charitable hospital” is not established, the plaintiffs are entitled to prevail.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Gammons v. Massachusetts Department of Housing & Community Development

    523 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 28, 2007

    Defendants have not briefed or pressed the defense of qualified immunity on behalf of the individual defendants. … For this reason, the Court defers consideration of whether any of the defendants are entitled to qualified immunity until such briefing and a full record is before the Court.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Abbott GmbH & Co. v. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc.

    870 F. Supp. 2d 206 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 4, 2012

    Because "{a] person must contribute to the conception of the claimed invention to qualify as a joint inventor," Vanderbilt Univ. v. … Centocor’s Motion for Summary Judgment No. 5, that the Joe antibodies qualify as prior art, is DENIED; 8.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Conille v. Pierce

    649 F. Supp. 1133 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 16, 1986

    The Secretary argues that plaintiff has failed to establish a waiver of sovereign immunity under either the NHA or the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (a)(2). … Since § 1702 contains no explicit waiver of immunity from suit for punitive damages, plaintiffs claim for treble damages is barred by sovereign immunity and must be dismissed.

    Vacated on other grounds by Marie Conille v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 840 F.2d 105 (1988)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ayyadurai v. Floor64, Inc.

    270 F. Supp. 3d 343 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 6, 2017

    To establish a defamation claim, a plaintiff must - satisfy four elements,. … Here, the record clearly establishes that the statements at issue involve a matter of public concern.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Curran v. Coddington

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 2023

    He asserts that (1) as the hearing officer designated by the Board, he is entitled to quasi-judicial immunity, (2) as the Executive Director of MHA, he is entitled to qualified immunity, (3) the complaint fails to … Plaintiff has not alleged a “clearly established” violation of her constitutional rights by Defendant, nor that a “reasonable officer’ in Defendant's position would have known that his actions violated Plaintiff's rights

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • GIARDI v. Dunning

    563 F. Supp. 2d 305 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 19, 2008

    The first paragraph of § 85K eliminates the defense of charitable immunity, while at the same time limiting recoverable damages to twenty thousand dollars. Mass. Gen. … The second paragraph, as amended in 1987, establishes a complete liability defense for a “person” acting as volunteer director, officer or trustee of an educational institution for actions done in “good faith and within the

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bird v. Demers

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 13, 2019

    Defendants have moved for summary judgment, based principally on the ground that they are entitled to qualified immunity. … Qualified Immunity Generally The doctrine of qualified immunity protects public employees “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Boston Professional Hockey Ass'n, Inc. v. Cheevers

    348 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 28, 1972

    His abilities are rated as outstanding by Coach Tom Johnson of the Bruins and by any qualified observer of professional hockey players. … The Bruins argue that the existence of a valid collective bargaining relationship immunizes certain practices common to professional sports from the scope of the antitrust laws.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Rohrberg v. Apfel

    26 F. Supp. 2d 303 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 12, 1998

    FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Rohrberg applied for SSDI benefits on January 17, 1994, alleging that she became unable to work on July 30, 1993, due to “Crohn’s disease [and] Chronic Immune Deficiency Syndrome.” … The record, however, established that the claimant had active Crohn’s disease and that medication improved but would not erase her various symptoms. See id. at 138 .

    Cited 98 timesPublished
  • Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for the Bankruptcy Estate of Boston Regional Medical Center, Inc. v. Ricks

    328 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 4, 2004

    are protected from liability to the corporation for mere negligence [and] gross negligence is required” to establish liability, the immunity statute would have added nothing to the protection afforded uncompensated directors … The second clause of the first sentence then qualifies the abrogation of charitable immunity by limiting the liability for tort damages to only those activities that “accomplish directly the charitable purposes.”

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Massachusetts v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.

    112 F.R.D. 149 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 15, 1986

    If this is the case, there is absolutely no reason to require an identification or specification of these documents; they are clearly privileged and no amount of specification can alter that conclusion. … Taylor ... which gives an attorney’s work-product a qualified immunity from discovery.”. Besley-Welles, supra, 43 F.R.D. at 371 . Lastly, in the case of Board of Education of Evanston TP v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Holden v. Barry

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 19, 2020

    To do so, they must show that it was objectively reasonable for the officers to believe that their action did not violate a clearly established constitutional right. See Starlight Sugar, Inc. v. … As discussed □ above, it is clearly established that the Constitution prohibits a warrantless arrest without probable cause.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hatton v. Mullan

    District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 7, 2018

    The Defendants also raise the qualified immunity defense. D. 43 at 15. … The invocation of qualified immunity does not, however, change the outcome.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Boston Executive Helicopters, LLC v. Maguire

    196 F. Supp. 3d 134 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 6, 2016

    The defendants claim immunity from antitrust liability under the doctrine established in Parker v. … Phoebe Putney. 2 Consequently, the court will dismiss BEH’s antitrust claims on grounds of state action immunity.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • In Re One Star Class Sloop Sailboat Built in 1930

    517 F. Supp. 2d 546 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 1, 2007

    only by establishing that the sloop was not forfeitable. … Clearly, some judges simply want to be rid of them. When I was a “baby judge” I attended a training session. The trainer was to address employment discrimination cases.

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.