Case law

9to5 Organization for Women Office Workers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

527 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 21, 1981

B. v. … See Chrysler v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 295-98 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1714-1716 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). Thus the first inquiry with regard to the Trade Secrets Act is whether disclosure is anywhere authorized by law.

Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co.

202 F. 602 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 1913

, to be elected treasurer of the Goddu Sons Metal Fastening Company,- and a part of its own directors, including the defendant Hurd, to be elected as the entire board of directors of the Goddu Sons Metal Fastening Company … Swift v. United States, 196 U. S. 375, 396 , 25 Sup. Ct. 276, 49 L. Ed. 518 ; United States v. American Tobacco Co., 221 U. S. 106, 184 , 31 Sup. Ct. 632, 55 L. Ed. 663 .

United States Ex Rel. Hutcheson v. Blackstone Medical, Inc.

694 F. Supp. 2d 48 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 12, 2010

Rost v. … Longhi v. United States, 575 F.3d 458, 467 (5th Cir.2009) (quoting United States ex rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir.2008)); see also United States ex rel. Hendow v.

Levin v. United States

403 F. Supp. 99 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 12, 1975

The Court held that Brown was not barred by the Feres doctrine from suing under the F. … United States v.

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. Atlantic Corp.

5 F.2d 529 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 4, 1925

By writ dated November 21, 1921, the United States Shipping- Board Emergency Fleet Corporation brought an action 'at law against the Atlantic Corporation, principal defendant, by trustee writ, in which the New England Trust … . - Thus, in Adams v.

Mitchell v. US Airways, Inc.

858 F. Supp. 2d 137 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 1, 2012

It is the interpretation of this preemptive language that lies at the heart of these two putative class actions: Mitchell v. U.S. Airways, Inc. and Brown v. United Air Lines, Inc. A. Background 1 1. Mitchell v. U.S. … Brown v. United Air Lines, Inc. Brown v. United Air Lines, Inc. is a putative class action brought on behalf of skycaps working at airports throughout the United States (“Brown Skycaps”) for United Air Lines, Inc.

McCarthy v. United States

232 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 19, 1964

McCarthy at the time the Board of Directors adopted the resolutions referred to above. *607 The starting point for deciding this genre of cases is Commissioner v. … United States, 261 F.2d 497 (7th Cir. 1958), reversing the District Court, cert. den. 359 U.S. 944 , 79 S.Ct. 724 , 3 L.Ed.2d 677 (1959); and Browne v.

McEachern v. Inter-Country Adoption Board of the Republic of the Philippines

62 F. Supp. 3d 187 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 26, 2014

See Semtek Int’l, Inc. v. Info. Satellite Sys., 2012 WL 831475 , at *5 (D.Mass. Mar. 9, 2012) (citing *191 Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Aerea Boliviana, 30 F.3d 148, 153-54 (D.C.Cir.1994) (collecting cases)); Magness v. … Republic of Argentina v. Weltover, Inc., 504 U.S. 607, 614 , 112 S.Ct. 2160 , 119 L.Ed.2d 394 (1992) (emphasis in the original) (citation omitted).

Blackwell v. Firearm Licensing Review Board

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 2025

) No. 1:24-cv-13080-JEK ) FIREARM LICENSING REVIEW BOARD ) and … See Santos v. Dep’t of Educ. of Com. of Puerto Rico, 108 F. App’x 638, 640 (1st Cir. 2004) (district courts have “the power to act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute”); Tower Ventures, Inc. v.

Donovan v. Massachusetts Parole Board

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 15, 2023

v. ) 22-11459-FDS ) MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD, ) … Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)).

Marrotta v. Suffolk County

726 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 29, 2010

Suffolk County, No. 05-10032, and superior officers assigned to the Suffolk County House of Correction and the Suffolk County Jail, in Brown v. … See id.; cf Williams v.

Prozina Shipping Co. v. Thirty-four Automobiles

179 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 22, 1998

Shortly before the seventy-eight cars were to be loaded on board the JEANIE BROWN for shipment to Haiti, a dispute arose between Prozina and ENS. … Prozina then proceeded to load the seventy-eight cars on board the JEANIE BROWN. Still not having been paid the charter hire, on May 15, Prozina withdrew the ship from charter.

Nolan v. Fitzpatrick

326 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 3, 1971

Jackson v. Godwin, 400 F.2d 529 (5th Cir., 1868); Brown v. Peyton, 437 F.2d 1228 (4th Cir., 1971); Fortune Society v. McGinnis, 319 F.Supp. 901 (S.D.N.Y., 1971). … See Brown v. Peyton, 437 F.2d 1228, 1231 (4th Cir., 1971).

Frazier v. Fairhaven School Committee

122 F. Supp. 2d 104 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 22, 2000

Board of Education of Skokie School District ( 98 F.3d 989 (7th Cir.1996)); W.L.G. v. … Brown v. Hot, Sexy and Safer Productions, Inc., 68 F.3d 525, 540 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1159 , 116 S.Ct. 1044 , 134 L.Ed.2d 191 (1996) (citing Meritor Savings Bank v.

Dinu v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

56 F. Supp. 2d 129 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 13, 1999

See, e.g., Mangla v. Brown University, 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st Cir.1998). … Coveney v.

United States v. Phillips

732 F. Supp. 255 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 1, 1990

United States v. … United States v.

Giardina v. Ambrose

301 F. Supp. 326 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 5, 1969

The Review and Appeal Board met and heard the petitioner’s case on April 23, 1968. Petitioner and his counsel appeared. The Board recommended that the active duty request be approved. … Fox v. Brown, 402 F.2d 837 (2 Cir. 1968).

The Evelyn Ruth

42 F.2d 458 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 3, 1930

When the boat floated on the rising tide, those of her crew who remained on board took her to sea without hindrance or pursuit. … In Brown v. United States, 16 F.(2d) 682 (C. C.

Landy v. D'ALESSANDRO

316 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2004

The 2001 proxy statement admits that Brown and D’Alessandro were compensated at some time on the basis of value created at the IPO. … Aronson , however, applies only to challenged transactions that were made by the board as a whole. See, e.g., Rales v.

Christensen v. Lawrence F. Quigley Memorial Hospital

656 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 1, 1985

Brown v. … Day v. Wayne County Board of Auditors, 749 F.2d 1199, 1204 (6th Cir. 1984).