Case law

Buckton v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

366 F. Supp. 1152 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 27, 1973

Alabama State Board of Education, 294 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1961), cert. den. 368 U.S. 930 , 82 S.Ct. 368 , 7 L.Ed.2d 193 (tax-supported college); Ryan v. … Brown testified that the N.C.A.A. imposes no such requirement.

United States v. Cargo of Liquors of Irene C.

41 F.2d 288 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 20, 1930

The cutter stopped and boarded the approaching vessel, which turned out to be tho Irene C. … All the liquor was in the forehold, which was sealed at the time when the vessel was boarded. The seals were broken by the boarding officers.

United States v. Block

483 F. Supp. 1296 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 6, 1980

Upon nearing and boarding the vessel the officers saw a brown leafy substance on the decks and the hatchway. At that point they began to search for suspects and marijuana as well. … Chambers v. Maroney, supra; Carroll v. United States, supra; United States v. Miller, supra. In Cardwell v.

The Rajah

20 F. Cas. 193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1852

This was the case in Johnson v. Sims [Case No. 7,413] and The Juliana, 2 Dod. 504, where the agreement was inserted in the shipping articles; and in Buck v. Rawlinson, 1 Brown, Pari. … Judge Story, in Brown v.

Pye ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n

419 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 10, 2006

NLRB v. … At that point, any final remedy which the Board could impose would be ineffective. Centro Medico, 900 F.2d at 454; see also NLRB v.

Pacific Mills v. Nichols

31 F. Supp. 43 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 26, 1939

The plaintiff relies for support upon Routzahn v. Brown, 6 Cir., 95 F.2d 766, 771 . That was a case involving an estate tax. … Routzahn v. Brown, supra, was perhaps such a case since the new defense changed the character of the litigation. But the situation, presented by the case at bar, is quite different.

Daugherty v. Elmcrest, Inc.

853 F. Supp. 561 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 26, 1994

On June 8, 1990, plaintiff Lana Brown Daugherty (“Daugherty”) attended a wedding reception held at the Elmcrest Country Club in East Longmeadow, Massachusetts. … In McGuiggan v.

Massachusetts Board of Registration in Pharmacy v. Drug Assist Health Solutions, Inc.

337 B.R. 5 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 2006

The preliminary injunction enjoined Defendants, and specifically the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Pharmacy (“Board”), “from taking or continuing any act ... to enforce against Drug Assist Health Solutions, Inc. … Thereafter, the preliminary injunction will be void, and the revocation order of the Board will have full effect, unless it is stayed either by the Board itself or by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

Fine Mortuary College, LLC v. American Board of Funeral Service Education, Inc.

473 F. Supp. 2d 153 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 18, 2006

93A (Counts III, IV and V). … Count V will be dismissed.

Alpert ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners

143 F. Supp. 371 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 12, 1956

J., concurring, in Brown v. Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co., 9 Cir., 218 F.2d 542, 544 . … The recent decision of National Labor Relations Board v.

Robison v. Johnson

352 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 4, 1973

First, although the Supreme Court has many times stressed the importance of education, see, e. g., Brown v. … Brown, 1961, 366 U.S. 599, 607 , 81 S.Ct. 1144, 1148 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 .

Gendron v. Kinjawi

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 25, 2025

See Harrington v. … (quoting Board of Educ. v. Assessor of Worcester, 368 Mass. 511, 513-14 (1975))).

United States v. Block

522 F. Supp. 451 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 9, 1981

As established in Warden v. … There was no evidence pointing to a probability that there was anyone aboard or even likely to gain entry on board from either the shore or the water. As distinguished from a case such as United States v.

United States v. Goodridge

945 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 11, 1996

United States v. … Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1543 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (quotations omitted). McCarthy, 77 F.3d at 534 .

Kreisberg ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Emerald Green Building Services, LLC

169 F. Supp. 3d 261 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 23, 2015

Courts should not resolve contested issues of fact and should defer to the characterization by the Board of the facts as long as the characterization is “within the range of rationality.” Rivera-Vega v. … N.L.R.B. v. Excel Case Ready, 238 F.3d 69 , 75 (1st Cir.2011).

Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Manchester-By-The-Sea

115 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 23, 2000

Foster, a Planning Board member, commented that the tower looked more like a chimney than a mast. Id. Mr. Brown, another Planning Board member, stated that Manchester does not want an 80-foot tower in its harbor. Id. … See AT & T Wireless PCS v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of Adjustment, 172 F.3d 307 (4th Cir.1999); AT & T Wireless PCS v. City Council of Virginia Beach, 155 F.3d 423 (1998).

Selame Associates, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc.

451 F. Supp. 412 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 11, 1978

Zammer went on board on two or three occasions and on one occasion he was on board with a carpentry contractor. 29. After the CHESAPEAKE was moored, Mr. Brown requested permission from Mr. … Inc. v. 60 Houseboat, 390 F.2d 596 (5th Cir. 1968); Kilb v. Menke, 121 F.2d 1013 (5th Cir. 1941); United States v.

Haidak v. University of Massachusetts-Amherst

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 9, 2018

See Donovan v. … Gabrilowitz v.

Fuchs v. Hood Industries, Inc.

471 F. Supp. 186 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 7, 1979

The Court’s function here, by contrast, is a limited one; it must determine “whether contested factual issues could ultimately be resolved by the Board in favor of the General Counsel.” Fuchs v. … Midwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. NLRB, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 413, 422 , 564 F.2d 434, 443 (1977); see NLRB v.

9to5 Organization for Women Office Workers v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

527 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 21, 1981

B. v. … See Chrysler v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 295-98 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1714-1716 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). Thus the first inquiry with regard to the Trade Secrets Act is whether disclosure is anywhere authorized by law.