Case law

Simas v. First Citizens' Federal Credit Union

63 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 30, 1999

See Simas v. … See Mitre, 949 F.Supp. at 949 ; Wright v.

United States v. Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency

162 F.R.D. 410 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 7, 1995

Once MIFA’s Board of Directors granted NEARI preliminary approval, NEARI began to search for an investor. … See Harper v.

Parkway Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Dav-O-Niter Corp.

132 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 1, 1955

I am shown in the prior art much if not most of all of the elements contained in the plaintiff’s patent, and, which is of much significance, McCord Corp. v. … Reviewing the exhibits introduced by the parties, and applying a bare residuum of what I think would be appropriate to consider judicial experience, within the limitations laid down by such cases as Brown v.

DeLeo v. Childs

304 F. Supp. 593 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 26, 1969

Horn Co. v. Assessors of Boston, 1947, 321 Mass. 579 , 74 N.E.2d 421 [statute shortening time for appeal to Appellate Tax Board, held retroactive]; Wynn v. … Board of Assessors, 1932, 281 Mass. 245 , 183 N.E. 528 [change in procedure in tax abatement proceedings, held retroactive]; Hollingsworth and Vose Co. v.

Donald M v. Matava

668 F. Supp. 714 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 13, 1987

See Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64 , 106 S.Ct. 423 , 88 L.Ed.2d 371 (1985); Edelman v. … County of Dakota, 772 F.2d 1433, 1435 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1014 , 106 S.Ct. 1192 , 89 L.Ed.2d 307 (1986); Brown v. Jones, 473 F.Supp. 439, 453 (N.D.Tex.1979). 3.

In Re Stacy

99 B.R. 142 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 24, 1989

Brown, 147 Mass. 296, 298 , 17 N.E. 549 (Mass.1888). … It is alleged by the buyers that title examiners in Hampden County refuse to certify such titles in light of Mennonite Board of Missions v.

Hough v. Marsh

557 F. Supp. 74 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 19, 1982

Relying on Middlesex County Sewerage Auth. v. … Group, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers, 505 F.Supp. 732 , 735 n. 1 (D.Md.1980); Sierra Club v. Alexander, 484 F.Supp. 455, 459-64 (N.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 633 F.2d 206 (2d Cir.1980); Sierra Club v.

The Marge

48 F.2d 649 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 24, 1931

-on that day the Coast Guard officers at Sandwich boarded and examined the boat and saw no cargo of any kind on board. … C.) 6 F.(2d) 414 ; Bush v. The Conejo (D. C.) 10 F.(2d) 256 ; see, also, The Rosemary (D. C.) 23 F.(2d) 103 .

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Gladstone

44 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 11, 1999

On June 9, 1986, Sumner Gladstone, De-lapa and Derderian were appointed to HFSB’s Board of Directors. Alfred Gladstone joined the Board as a director on June 25, 1987. And in June 1987, Charles H. … Board of Health of Holbrook v. Nelson, 351 Mass. 17 , 217 N.E.2d 777 (1966) (citing Town of Lincoln v. Giles, 317 Mass. 185 , 57 N.E.2d 554 (1944)).

New England Concrete Pipe Corp. v. D/C Systems of New England, Inc.

495 F. Supp. 1334 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 22, 1980

See Sherman v. Rent Control Bd. of Brookline, 1975, 367 Mass. 1, 7 , 323 N.E.2d 730 ; Middlesex & Boston St. Ry. Co. v. Board of Aldermen of Newton, 1977, 371 Mass. 849, 861 , 359 N.E.2d 1279 . … In Gorman Towers Inc. v.

Green v. Cosby

99 F. Supp. 3d 223 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 16, 2015

See generally Smith v. … See generally Anand v.

Mathews v. Reno

52 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 18, 1999

LaGuerre v. … In April 1997, the Board denied the motion on the ground that AEDPA § 440(d) rendered Turavani statutorily ineligible for section 212(e) relief. In Lee v.

In re Currier

6 F. Cas. 988 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1875

Clinton v. Mayo [Case No. 2,S99]; In re Israel [Id. 7,111]. The original statute, re-enacted in Bev. … Judge Brown has held that "number” means “number.” In re Hadley [Id. 5,804]. My impression is that the latter decision is to be preferred.

Johnston v. Mitchell

213 F. Supp. 3d 282 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 3, 2016

Lynch v. … See Brown, 449 Mass, at 749, 872 N.E.2d 711 (rejecting that argument). . The Court agrees with the Fifth Circuit’s analysis of a similar issue: "[u]nlike the defendant in Estelle v.

P. Dougherty Co. v. 2471 Tons of Coal Ex Barge Annapolis

278 F. 799 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 25, 1922

I., Inc., v. C. Hannevig, Inc. (C. C. … Water Board v. Dick, [1918] App. Cas. 119.

Green v. Truman

459 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 27, 1978

Truman, a board-certified pediatric hematologist affiliated with the Massachusetts General Hospital. … Sylvander v. New England Home for Little Wanderers, supra at 1107. Accord Jennings v. Caddo Parish School Board, 531 F.2d 1331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 897 , 97 S.Ct. 260 , 50 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976).

In re Gomes

27 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 28, 1939

The decision of the Immigration Commissioner was reviewed by a Board of Review and affirmed. … Pedaris, 10 Cir., 55 F.2d 597 ; Pantazes v. Hays, D.C., 15 F.Supp. 1053 and United States ex rel. Sinclair v. Smith, D.C., 33 F.2d 914 . These cases are all distinguishable on the facts.

United States v. Tran

226 F. Supp. 3d 58 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 28, 2016

Below these images, the site stated: “No cross-board reposts, .7z preferred, encrypt filenames, include preview ....” Id. ¶ 12. … Agent Macfarlane explained that “no cross-board reposts” was an instruction to users not to post material appearing on other sites.

Durant v. Chater

906 F. Supp. 706 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 24, 1995

Brown. In this examination, Durant stated that she suffered from insomnia associated with her preoccupation of finding her son, whom she has not seen in thirty years. … See Conner v.

Taing v. Chertoff

526 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 12, 2007

“Pure question of law [such as the proper definition of ‘spouse’ under section 1151] raised in a petition to review a decision of the [Board of Immigration Appeals] are reviewed de novo.” de Martinez v. … .); Enos v.