Case law

United States v. Arndt

329 F. Supp. 2d 182 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 8, 2004

The second document, which bears the same date, is a news release from the Board detailing the basis for the Board’s action. The document states that the Board found that “Dr. … V.

Caterino v. Barry

761 F. Supp. 897 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 19, 1991

Cleary v. Graphic Communications Intern. Union, 841 F.2d 444, 449 (1st Cir.1988); Govoni v. Bricklayers, Masons & Plasterers Int’l. Union of America, Local No. 5 Pension Fund, 732 F.2d 250, 252 (1st Cir.1984); Palino v. … See Ponce v. Const. Laborers Pension Trust, 628 F.2d 537 , 542 (9th Cir.1980); Roark v. Lewis, 401 F.2d 425, 429 (D.C.Cir.1968). B.

Measurement Computing Corp. v. GENERAL PATENT CORP. INTERNATIONAL

304 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 10, 2004

The Parties Measurement, formerly doing business as Computer Boards, is a Massachusetts corporation that manufactures circuit boards used to connect personal computers to external devices. Compl. [Doc. No. 1] ¶¶ 2, 3. … Genetic Implant Sys., Inc. v. Core-Vent Corp., 123 F.3d 1455, 1458 (Fed.Cir.1997) (citing Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 471-76 , 105 S.Ct. 2174 , 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985)).

Sokol v. University Hospital, Inc.

402 F. Supp. 1029 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 14, 1975

Ward v. St. Anthony Hospital, 476 F.2d 671, 675 (10 Cir. 1973); Barrett v. United Hospital, 376 F.Supp. 791, 800-802 (S.D.N.Y., 1974); Bricker v. … This argument was correctly rejected in Ward v. St. Anthony Hospital, supra, and Barrett v. United Hospital, supra.

Evory v. Burt

15 F. 112 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 3, 1883

Another patent, issued to Brown & Wootin, was for flaps inserted in the heel and brought round on each side of the foot. … The Evory & Heston patent was held valid in Evory v. Candee, 2 Fed. Rep. 542, and its validity is not now assailed, unless a wide construction is 'given to the claim. And this, as is most usual, is the difficult point.

United States v. Buchanan

930 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 4, 1996

The Board of Directors includes a Bank vice president, one or two other officers of the Bank and three members who were not Bank employees. The Board met on a monthly basis. 5 . … See Zafiro v.

In re Criminal Investigation of Doe

901 F. Supp. 2d 251 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 14, 2012

See, e.g., United States v. … States v.

Wasson v. Stetson

214 F. 329 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 18, 1914

C.) 2 Fed. 396 ; Lindsay v. Cusimano (C. C.) 12 Fed. 504 . In Hinckley v. Wilson Humber Co. (D. … The evidence is that the capacity of the Chamberlain for dry, planed, or rough boards was 260,000 feet.

In re Boraks

142 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1956

Gottlieb, hereinafter called the wife, was one of a party of guests on board the petitioner’s gasoline yacht when it caught fire and sank. … Thibeault v. Poole, supra.

Considine v. Black Diamond Steamship Corp.

163 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 24, 1958

A stevedore temporarily operating his employer’s truck on board a ship is performing no more dangerous activity than if he were operating the same truck dockside. … Judge Wyzanski’s exhaustive analysis in Jenkins v.

In Re Cape Fear, Inc. for Exoneration of Liab.

183 F. Supp. 2d 228 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 20, 2001

See, e.g., Moore v. … See Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, 362 U.S. 539, 549 , 80 S.Ct. 926 , 4 L.Ed.2d 941 (1960); Ferrara v. A. & V.

Cignetti v. Healy

967 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 22, 1997

Board of County Commissioners v. Umbehr, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996) (garbage collector’s criticisms of County, Board of Commissioners deemed matter of “public concern”); Rankin v. … In Disend v.

Curtis v. Duffy

742 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 18, 1990

See, e.g., Norman v. Brown, Todd & Heyburn, 693 F.Supp. 1259, 1263 (D.Mass.1988). … .-, 109 S.Ct. 2893, 2900 , 106 L.Ed.2d 195 (1989); Norman v. Brown, Todd & Heyburn, 693 F.Supp. 1259 (D.Mass.1988) (listing the critical factors).

United States v. Buchanan

987 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 18, 1997

United States v. … Koon In Koon v.

Brewer v. Hassett

49 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 23, 1943

The Board of Appeals, in a series of cases starting with Estate of Mary H. Hughes v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 44 B.T.A. 1196 , held that Hassett v. Welch, supra, and May v. … No. 69 , Docket No. 109069, the Board of Tax Appeals reversed its position in the Hughes case, stating that Hassett v. Welch, supra, and May v. Heiner, supra, are still controlling.

H.E.A. of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Bowen

685 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 18, 1987

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). “[I]n general, something less than a full evidentiary hearing is sufficient prior to adverse administrative action.”

Clough v. Guzzi

416 F. Supp. 1057 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 9, 1976

See Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 2562 , 49 L.Ed.2d -, 44 U.S.L.W. 5077 , 5079 & n.3 (1976). … Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 , 333 n.2, 92 S.Ct. 995, 998 , 31 L.Ed.2d 274 (1972); Reed v. Board of Election Commissioners, 459 F.2d 121 , 124 n.5 (1st Cir. 1972).

Schofield v. Clark

686 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 2010

After convening a reclassification hearing on October 28, 2009, the Classification Board recommended that Schofield be transferred to Massachusetts Correctional Institution-Norfolk (“MCI-Norfolk”). … Nieves-Marquez v. Puerto Rico, 353 F.3d 108 , 120 (1st Cir.2003) (citation omitted). The likelihood of success on the merits is the critical factor in preliminary injunction analysis. Weaver v.

Salem Trust Co. v. Federal Nat. Bank

11 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 21, 1934

Hatch v. Coddington, 95 U. S. 48 , 24 L. Ed. 339 ; Malaguti v. Rosen, 262 Mass. 555 , 160 N. E. 532 . Under the laws of Massachusetts its corporate powers are exercised by its board of directors. … The statutes provide for the election of a treasurer by the board of directors.

Shabazz v. Cole

69 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 24, 1999

The applicable standard when an inmate challenges the finding of a prison disciplinary board is one of substantial evidence. 7 Murphy v. … See Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of Carlisle, 369 Mass. 755 , 343 N.E.2d 382, 385 (1976) (chapter 249 claim "should be decided on the record developed before the governmental agency”); Malone v.