Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmad

6,281 results

1.20s

  • The Philomena

    200 F. 873 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 5, 1912

    They are seven in number, as below: [1] (1) Irving V. … After that time, however, he can hardly be said to have been rendering services on board in the ordinary maritime sense.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Partners Healthcare System, Inc. v. Sullivan

    497 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 25, 2007

    .”); Burning v. … Ass’n of Am. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Desrochers v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

    28 F. Supp. 2d 693 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 9, 1998

    Compare O’Hara v. Mount Vernon Board of Education, 16 F.Supp.2d, 868, 895 (S.D.Ohio 1998) and Jolliffe v. Mitchell, 971 F.Supp. 1039, 1045 (W.D.Va.1997) and Clay v. … See O’Hara v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • United States ex rel. Rost v. Pfizer, Inc.

    253 F.R.D. 11 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 18, 2008

    Coyne v. City of Somerville, 972 F.2d 440, 442-43 (1st Cir. 1992) (citing Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez, 903 F.2d 49, 51 (1st Cir.1990)). … For support, the Defendants look to Edmonds v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Martin v. McCarthy

    520 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 7, 1981

    At the time he filed the application, he also had a claim for workmen’s compensation benefits pending before the Industrial Accident Board. … On November 13, 1979, the Industrial Accident Board awarded a lump-sum settlement in the amount of $33,054.59.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Crowley v. Hurd

    172 F. 498 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 13, 1906

    In Bartlett v. … C.) 31 Fed. 420 ; Sutton v. Housatonic R. R. Co. (D. C.) 45 Fed. 507 ; Gage v. Morse, 12 Allen (Mass.) 410, 90 Am. Dec. 155 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Two Hundred & Ten Barrels of Oil

    24 F. Cas. 448 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1844

    On the two following days he boarded the wreck again, and took some articles of her apparel. … Law & Eq. 622, cited with approval in Post v. Jones, 19 How.' [60 U. S.] 161. But see Ahb. Shipp. 555; Story’s note; The Galaxy [Case No. 5,-186]; The John Wurts [Id. 7.434]; The Britannia, 3 Hagg. Adm. 153.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Borden

    24 F. Cas. 1202 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 15, 1857

    S. v. Lunt TCase No. 15.(543]: The Mos-lem rid- 9.875): The Mary Ann fid-- 9.194]: V. S. v. (riving!, [Id. 15.212]; U. S. v. … The end accomplished, must be either the having usurped the command of the vessel from the lawful commanding officer, or the having deprived him of his authority and command on board thereof, or resisted, or prevented him

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maxwell v. Aer Lingus Ltd.

    122 F. Supp. 2d 210 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 15, 2000

    BACKGROUND Noreen Maxwell boarded Aer Lingus Flight 132 in Boston on April 23, 1997, bound for Shannon Airport in Ireland. … In Wallace v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Massaro v. Fisk Rubber Corporation

    36 F. Supp. 382 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 10, 1941

    Securities and Exchange Commission v. O’Hara Re-Election Committee, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 523, 525 ; Harrison v. Triplex Gold Mines, 1 Cir., 33 F.2d 667, 672 ; Richardson v. Clinton Wall Trunk Mfg. … In a footnote to Palmer v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Vartanian v. Monsanto Co.

    956 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 20, 1997

    Vartanian v. Monsanto Co., 14 F.3d 697, 702 (1st Cir.1994), citing Astor v. International Business Machines Corp., 7 F.3d 533, 538-39 (6th Cir.1993). … This Management Board met six times between April 21 and May 1, 1991. During these meetings the Board discussed the possibility of discontinuing or selling certain product lines.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Banco Do Brasil, S.A. v. 275 Washington Street Corp.

    889 F. Supp. 2d 178 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 17, 2012

    Section 225.22 of the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y. … Compare Sechrest v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jin-Ming Lin v. Chinatown Restaurant Corp.

    771 F. Supp. 2d 185 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 23, 2011

    See, e.g., Villareal v. El Chile, Inc., 266 F.R.D. 207, 212-14 (N.D.Ill.2010); Zavala v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 393 F.Supp.2d 295, 321-25 (D.N.J.2005); Singh v. … Bildisco & Bildisco, 465 U.S. 513 , 529 n. 9, 104 S.Ct. 1188 , 79 L.Ed.2d 482 (1984) (“While the Board’s interpretation of the NLRA should be given some deference, the proposition that the Board’s interpretation of statutes

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jew Yut Chew v. Tillinghast

    25 F.2d 886 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 23, 1928

    Both the Board of Special Inquiry and the Board of Review agree that the testimony of these witnesses presented no significant discrepancies inter se, and on its face no grounds for rejecting it as perjured. … This ease is so similar to Go Lun v. Nagle, 22 F. (2d) 246 (C. C. A. 9th), and to Johnson v. Damon, 16 F.(2d) 65 (C. C. A. 1st), that an extended discussion of the law is unnecessary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carranza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    89 F. Supp. 2d 91 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 29, 2000

    See Libretti v. … See Mele v. Fitchburg District Court, 850 F.2d 817, 820 (1st Cir.1988); Gagne v. Fair, 835 F.2d 6, 7 (1st Cir.1987).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Boston Archdiocese Teachers Ass'n v. Archdiocesan Central High Schools, Inc.

    383 F. Supp. 2d 269 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 15, 2005

    See Watterson v. Page, 987 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1993); Miranda v. Ponce Fed’l Bank, 948 F.2d 41, 44 (1st Cir.1991). … See Crilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 529 F.2d 1355, 1359 (3rd Cir.1976). The NLRA is now part of the broader LMRA. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 141 (a), 167. In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Image and Sound Service Corp. v. Altec Service Corp.

    148 F. Supp. 237 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 28, 1956

    See also Brownlee v. Malco Theatres, Inc., D.C., 99 F.Supp. 312 ; Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. … It is furthermore apparent from the minutes of the special Board of Directors meeting of April 4, 1955, that even Hacking’s action as a director was ratified by the whole Board which gave him full authority to settle this

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Boulger v. United States

    60 F.2d 560 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 17, 1932

    The pertinent facts are these: In August, 1917, Boulger came before the local draft board, and was accepted for military service. … Misenhelter v. United States (D. C.) 28 F.(2d) 771 ; Wood v. United States (D. C.) 28 F.(2d) 771, 772 ; O’Hora v. United States (D. C.) 49 F.(2d) 945 ; United States v. Ranes (C. C. A.) 48 F.(2d) 582 . In Wood v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • The Philomena

    200 F. 859 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 21, 1911

    Six others — four on September 27th by Brown Bros. Company, George C. Tarr, Gloucester^ Coal Company, and John P. Souza, and one on October 3d and one'on October 5th by Charles A. … Moran v. Sturges, 154 U. S. 263 , 14 Sup. Ct. 1019, 38 L. Ed. 981 ; Paxson v. Cunningham, 63 Fed. 132 , 11 C. C. A. 111 ; Hudson v. New York, etc., Co., 180 Fed. 973 , 104 C. C. A. 129 . It was said in Paxson v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Town of Deerfield

    25 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 4, 1939

    In Leoles v. Landers, 184 Ga. 580 , 192 S.E. 218 , and in Hering v. State Board of Education, 117 N.J.L. 455 , 189 A. 629 , the courts considered statutes in all material respects similar to the Massachusetts law. … Leoles v. Landers, 302 U.S. 656 , 58 S.Ct 364 , 82 L.Ed. 507 ; Hering v. State Board of Education, 303 U.S. 624 , 58 S.Ct. 752 , 82 L.Ed. 1087 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.