Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,024 results
1.64s
208 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 16, 2002
A, p. 8) Thus, there was an agreement to arbitrate disputes arising under the second agreement since the second agreement clearly qualifies as an “employment agreement” between Donovan and Raytheon. VI. … In the words of the Supreme Court: The Arbitration Act establishes that, as a matter of federal law, any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor or arbitration, whether the problem at
Cited 0 timesPublished675 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 22, 1987
The jury clearly chose to believe it. Thus, the jury must have found that the chief government witness, Gerald W. … See 28 U.S.C. § 1871 (b)(1) (establishing juror compensation at thirty dollars per day).
Cited 12 timesPublishedBurtman Iron Works, Inc. v. Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc.
97 F. Supp. 2d 122 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2000
Con-Way has proffered evidence to establish both the terms of the applicable bill of lading and that those terms govern this transaction. … [Con-Way’s] inspection reports clearly display the damage and the fact that such damage occurred while the goods were in custody and control of [Con-Way].
Cited 1 timesPublishedMoniz v. Crossland Mortgage Corp.
175 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 2, 1997
As CrossLand explains, rate sheets establishing a “par” value for specific loans are set daily based on market forces. … There, this Court found that the factual record did not clearly establish that the yield spread premium paid by CrossLand to Dream House was not reasonable compensation for goods or services.
Cited 7 timesPublished134 F.R.D. 13 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 7, 1991
Plaintiff cannot establish that he relied on events which occurred after he purchased his stock. Any injuries sustained by Mr. … The plaintiff clearly relied on the integrity of the market in making his investment decision.
Cited 19 timesPublished417 F. Supp. 1332 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 6, 1976
POLLOCK was then advised that he was not immune from prosecution because he was agreeing to work with law enforcement authorities. … POLLOCK was then advised that he was not immune from prosecution because he was agreeing to work with law enforcement authorities.
Cited 18 timesPublishedCity of Waltham v. United States Postal Service
786 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 2, 1992
With the administrative record established, the Court turns to matters of substance. … The administrative record, as this Court has defined it, is clearly inaccurate in this respect.
Cited 11 timesPublishedKeating v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 13, 2024
and absolute immunity. … Beaupre , 977 F.3d 127, 135 (1st Cir. 2020) (“Once [a] defendant establishe[s a] defense of statute of limitations the burden shifts to plaintiff to establish that the statute of limitations does not apply.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownPowers v. United Health Plans of New England, Inc.
979 F. Supp. 64 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 6, 1997
Clearly, [the ex-employee’s] ability to obtain the converted life insurance policy arose from the ERISA plan, and the converted policy itself continued to be integrally linked with the ERISA plan. … The answer would clearly be “yes.” Second, a determination that the Powers’ individual contract of insurance is governed by ERISA could work a potential unfairness on ex-employees.
Cited 6 timesPublished683 F. Supp. 2d 129 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 8, 2010
establish the six-month timeline which is part of the criteria” in the DSM-IV-TR. 99 Dr. … Salter’s opinion, qualify for a diagnosis of Sexual Sadism, she opined that the strangulations that occurred in the 1987 Rape “speak[] to a disordered arousal pattern.” 101 She also stated that “the strangulations are clearly
Cited 1 timesPublished150 F. Supp. 2d 249 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 19, 2001
Defendant also misstates the meaning of “qualified” for the purpose of the prima facie case. … Plaintiff need not show that she was “qualified” for partnership in the sense that she was clearly entitled to partnership; rather, plaintiff must merely show “that she was sufficiently qualified to be among those persons
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 8, 2018
The Supreme Court has established a two-prong test to determine whether an act is “judicial” for purposes of establishing immunity. … Under this line of authority, Defendant is clearly immune from suit in this court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLocal Division 589, Amalgamated Transit Union v. Massachusetts
511 F. Supp. 312 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 17, 1981
This clearly is not intended to be exclusive. … The propriety of such layoffs is clearly a controversy subject to binding arbitration under the terms of Article XLI of the collective bargaining agreement.
Cited 5 timesPublishedComfort Ex Rel. Neumyer v. Lynn School Committee
263 F. Supp. 2d 209 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 6, 2003
See Paradise, 480 U.S. at 182 , 107 S.Ct. 1053 (finding significant the fact that a racial classification prefers only qualified applicants of one race for hiring or promotion, and that the impact on qualified applicants … The evidence clearly establishes a risk of reversion to segregation, but of a de facto nature.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSmith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc. v. Connolly
887 F. Supp. 337 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 16, 1994
Treas.Reg. § 301.6323(h) — 1(g) (1976). 10 To qualify, a *343 judgment holder must (1) “perfeet[] a lien under the judgment on the property involved” according to “local law,” Treas.Reg. § 301.6323(h) — 1(g) (1976); See United … Because there is no waiver of sovereign immunity for a taxpayer to challenge the merits of his assessed tax liabilities in an interpleader action, Mclnerney cannot contest the merits of his assessed tax liabilities here.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMarkle v. HSBC Mortgage Corp. (USA)
844 F. Supp. 2d 172 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 12, 2011
If the homeowner qualifies under these eligibility criteria, the guidelines direct the servicer to offer that individual a Trial Period Plan (“TPP”). … An intended beneficiary need not be specifically named in the contract, however, so long as he falls “within a class clearly intended by the parties to benefit from the contract.”
Cited 43 timesPublishedLopez v. Equity Office Management, LLC
597 F. Supp. 2d 189 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 10, 2009
It also required that the services be performed “by qualified, careful and efficient employees in conformity with best industry practices and to [Equityl’s satisfaction.” … [UNICCO] agrees each of its employees will be properly qualified and will use reasonable care in the performance of Services....
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnleashed Doggie Day Care, LLC v. PetCo Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.
828 F. Supp. 2d 384 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 16, 2010
“[T]o be eligible for trademark protection, a mark must qualify as distinctive.” Id. … Two affidavits from a client pool of 1500 dog owners and a claimed target market consisting of every dog owner in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire are clearly insufficient to establish that “a significant quantity
Cited 9 timesPublished680 F. Supp. 455 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 23, 1988
Doubts may exist about the precise meaning of the established requirement of a "clear statement" of "Congressional intent" to preempt state law. See, e.g., Atascadero State Hospital v. … denied, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 229 , 98 L.Ed.2d 188 (1987), and authorities therein cited, I conclude that a decision on this question of "Congressional intent" will be precedent, that higher courts will not apply the "clearly
Cited 0 timesPublishedBuchanan v. Massachusetts Department of Correction
District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 23, 2024
The request included a personal statement, stating in relevant part that “[b]eing forced, pressured, intimidated or coerced to ingest or receive any substance into my body that clearly violates my conscience, or my personal … The FDA approved the COVID- 19 vaccine for immunization to prevent a communicable disease. (Opp. Ex. B at 12).
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna