Case law

One Din ex rel. One Gock Toon v. Ward

20 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 9, 1937

The excluding decision is based on discrepancies which the Board of Special Inquiry thought were of major importance. … The discrepancies relating to the layout of the village of over seventy houses was properly dismissed as unimportant by the Board of Review. See Johnson v. Damon (C.C.A.) 16 F.(2d) 65 .

Loring v. United States

80 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 26, 1948

Of course, in situations such as that in United States v. … United States v. Dunbar, supra.

United States v. Flowers

981 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 12, 1997

For example in United States v. … United States v.

Heritage Homes of Attleboro, Inc. v. Seekonk Water District

498 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 3, 1980

Seekonk Water District, 448 F.Supp. 1256 and Des-Vergnes v. Seekonk Water District, 463 F.Supp. 686 . … Those attending the meeting were informed by the Chairman of the Planning Board that approval of the application was a routine Planning Board procedure.

Sinovac Biotech LTD v. 1Globe Capital LLC

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 2018

Defendant relies on Langner v. Brown, 913 F. Supp. 260 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), for that proposition. The court in that case relied, in turn, on Mutual Shares Corp. v. … Int’l, Inc. v.

Knights of Columbus v. Town of Lexington

138 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 27, 2001

See United States v. … See also Church of The Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v.

Owens v. School Committee of Boston

304 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 21, 1969

Its functions could readily be assigned to an appointed official or board, to the appointment of which the restrictions of Baker v. … Sailors v. Board of Education of Kent County, 387 U.S. 105 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 650 . The School Committee here does not strictly fall within the ruling in Avery v.

International Union of Operating Engineers Local 98 Health & Welfare Fund v. S & R Corp.

95 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 23, 2015

The Local 98 Funds Board of Trustees holds the responsibility to implement the collections policy. (Id. ¶ 10.) On June 28, 2012, the Board of Trustees met via conference call. (Minutes, Dkt. 23, Attach. 2 at 74.) … Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a); Bonneau v. Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union 51 Pension Trust Fund, 736 F.3d 33, 36 (1st Cir.2013).

Baranek v. Kelly

630 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 1986

E.g., Sedlacek v. Hach, 752 F.2d 333 , 336 (8th Cir.1985). … Owens v. Rush, 636 F.2d 283, 287 (10th Cir.1980).

Kendall v. Lyman

161 F. 652 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 1908

Gulbenkian v. Stranahan, United States Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, April 29, 1907 (T. D. 28,451) 158 Fed. 836 ; Klumpp v. … Since there was a technical breach of duty in the failure of the collector to transmit the papers to the Board of General Appraisers, as-required by section 14 of the customs administrative act of 1890, judgment should be

Marshall v. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

458 F. Supp. 709 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 3, 1978

Phillips, Inc. v. Walling, 324 U.S. 490, 493 , 65 S.Ct. 807 , 89 L.Ed. 1095 (1945); Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co., 359 U.S. 290, 295 , 79 S.Ct. 756 , 3 L.Ed.2d 815 (1959); Arnold v. … United States, 248 F.Supp. 273 (S.D.Cal.1965); Sennett v. Shell Oil Company, 325 F.Supp. 1 (E.D.La.1971); Bennett v. Perini Corporation, 510 F.2d 114 (1st Cir. 1975); Sternberg Dredging Co. v.

Cobb v. Prokop

557 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 16, 1983

Kyle v. ICC, 609 F.2d 540 , 542 (D.C.Cir.1979). … Gardner v. Panama Railroad Co., 342 U.S. 29 , 72 S.Ct. 12 , 96 L.Ed. 31 (1951); Holmberg v. Ambrecht, 327 U.S. 392 , 66 S.Ct. 582 , 90 L.Ed. 743 .(1946); Goodman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 606 F.2d 800 (8th Cir.1979).

Tarr v. The Lydia A. Harvey

84 F. 1000 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 10, 1898

BROWN, District Judge. This case presents questions of the validity of claims to funds in the registry resulting "from a sale of the Lydia A. Harvey. … Potter v. Insurance Co., 3 Sumn. 27, 45 , Fed. Cas. No. 11,335; Wallace v. Insurance Co., 22 Fed. 66, 70 .

Strachan v. Ashe

548 F. Supp. 1193 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 13, 1982

Defendant Ashe permitted an appeal from the Disciplinary Board decision and on September 25 ratified the Board’s action, except with respect to the punishment which he reduced to fifty days. … In Furtado v.

Ex parte Prout

253 F. 97 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 26, 1916

The majority of the Board of Special Inquiry found that each alien had “been induced or solicited to migrate to this country by offers or *98 promises of employment” (Decision of Board), and on that ground alone excluded … Whitfield v. Hanges, 222 Fed. 745 , 138 C. C. A. 199 (C. C. A. 8th Circuit); U. S. ex rel. Cline v. Williams, 189 Fed. 915 (C. C. D. Ct. N. Y.).

Flanders v. Tripp

9 F. Cas. 246 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1871

S.] 108; The Wave [Case No. 17,297]; on appeal [Id. 17,300]; Hope v. The Dido [Id. 6,679]; Lea v. The Alexander [Id. 8,153]; The Jonge Andries, Swab. 226; on appeal, 11 Moore, P. C. 313; Dexter v. … The Wave v. Hyer [Case No. 17,300].

Saklad v. Hurley Shoe Co.

3 F. Supp. 904 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 20, 1933

Ed. 298 ; Trico Products Corp. v. Rico Mfg. Co. (D. C.) 45 F.(2d) 599 ; Trico Products Co. v. Apco-Mossberg Corp., supra; Gotham Silk Hosiery Co., Inc., v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. (D. C.) 1 F. Supp. 643 . … See Shevenell v. Geo. J. Kelly, Inc. (D. C.) 19 F.(2d) 791 .

Doe v. Lawson

579 F. Supp. 1314 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 19, 1984

In Board of Education v. … Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. at 206 , 102 S.Ct. at 3051 . 2. Individual Contact.

In re Luna

152 B.R. 11 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 8, 1993

Garcia v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., 109 B.R. 335 (N.D.Ill.1989); Schewe v. Fairview Estates (In re Schewe), 94 B.R. 938 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1989). … Of course, if the Board should seek to enforce its order as to the pre-petition rent overcharges, the situation would be different. See Colon v.

Langhammer v. Hamilton

194 F. Supp. 854 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 31, 1961

On February 9,1959, plaintiff appealed this deportation order to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and plaintiff’s counsel filed a brief with said Board. On March 9, 1960, the Board ordered the appeal dismissed. … See, also, Clarke v. Landon, 1 Cir., 239 F.2d 631 . The case of Benvenuto v.