Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersmad

6,281 results

1.55s

  • Oses v. Com. of Mass.

    775 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 7, 1991

    See Nadwomy, 872 F.2d at 1100 ; Brown v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 478 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1973).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mashpee Tribe v. Watt

    542 F. Supp. 797 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1982

    In Brown v. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. at 132 , 99 S.Ct. at 2209 . And, in Blonder-Tongue v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • MAZ Partners LP v. Shear

    265 F. Supp. 3d 109 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 13, 2017

    Has the plaintiff MAZ proven that Bruce Shear controlled a majority of the PHC Board of Directors with regard to the Board’s decision to approve the merger? Yes _X_ No_ 2. … However, Cede & Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The City of Boston

    159 F. 261 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 9, 1907

    The Niagara v. Cordes, *266 21 How. 7, 27 , 16 L. Ed. 41 . … Railroad Co. v. Reeves, 10 Wall. 176 , 19 L. Ed. 909 ; Holladay v. Kennard, 12 Wall. 254 , 20 L. Ed. 390 ; The Styria, 186 U. S. 1, 10 , 22 Sup. Ct. 731, 46 L. Ed. 1027 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Davis

    638 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 11, 1986

    Defendant responded by showing Lemon two boarding passes with the names Reggie Knight and Donald Robinson on them. … After examining the boarding passes, Lemon returned them to defendant and asked again if defendant had his ticket. Tr. at 11.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. Riley

    214 F. 799 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 22, 1914

    As to this proposition the defendants rely upon Heald v Rice, 104 U. S. 737 , 26 L. Ed. 910 , Hailes v. Van Wormer, 20 Wall. 353 , 22 L. Ed. 241 , and Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co., 177 U. S. 485 , 20 Sup. … In Underfeed Stoker Co. v. American Ship Windlass Co. (C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hussey v. Sullivan

    498 F. Supp. 594 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 17, 1980

    Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Wishart v. McDonald, 500 F.2d 1110, 1114 (1st Cir. 1974). … Palmigiano v. Mullen, 491 F.2d 978 , 980 n. 4 (1st Cir. 1974); Raper v. Lucey, 488 F.2d 748 , 751 n. 3 (1st Cir. 1973); Stevenson v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. 40,438 Square Feet of Land in Boston

    66 F. Supp. 659 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 6, 1946

    See United States v. 6.74 Acres of Land in Dade County, Florida, 5 Cir., 148 F.2d 618 ; United States v. 243.22 Acres of Land, 2 Cir., 129 F.2d 678 , at page 683; United States v. … The petitioner has failed to show any vote of its Board of Directors or any act by a duly authorized officer of the corporation authorizing the making of this election by Griffin or any one else or that the Board of Directors

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Thompson

    21 F.2d 74 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 19, 1927

    See, also, Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U. S. 179 , 27 S. Ct. 459 , 51 L. Ed. 760 ; Ex parte Coatz (D. C.) 242 F. 1003 ; Shapley v. Cohoon (D. C.) 258 F. 752 . … Day v. Keim (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 966 . See, also, Austin v. Williams (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 66 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fleming v. Lowell Sun Co.

    36 F. Supp. 320 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 22, 1940

    National Labor Relations Board, 301 U.S. 103 , 57 S.Ct. 650 , 81 L.Ed. 953 , and National Labor Relations Board v. A. S. Abell Co., 4 Cir., 97 F.2d 951 , and cases cited, to raise, it successfully now. Cf. Gibbons v. … Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1 , 6 L.Ed. 23 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Lowell Sun Co. v. Fleming, 120 F.2d 213 (1941)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Lolos v. Solutia, Inc.

    193 F. Supp. 2d 364 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2002

    The Supreme Court noted this limitation in School Board of Nassau County, Fla. v. … Hurley-Bardige v. Brown, 900 F.Supp. 567, 571 (D.Mass.1995) (citing cases). Here, Plaintiff offers no evidence that she could have performed her SEO job at a different “location” or “work site.”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • The Mary

    59 F.2d 771 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1932

    The officers boarding this vessel recognized those on board as the same men who were seen on the Mary when it was in York river. … Maul v. United States, 274 U. S. 501 , 47 S. Ct. 735 , 71 L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Barker v. City of Boston

    795 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 5, 2011

    Hayden v. Grayson, 134 F.3d 449, 456 (1st Cir.1998). a. … See Board of Cnty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). The Plaintiff must show that Boston ignored a known or obvious risk of a highly predictable severe harm.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Schaum & Uhlinger, Inc. v. Copley-Plaza Operating Co.

    260 F. 197 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 8, 1919

    Thereupon an appeal was taken to the Board of Examiners in Chief, and there reargued orally and in writing. … But it does not appear to have occurred either to the examiner or to the Board of Appeal that the amendment now attacked was new matter and as such unwarranted by the original disclosure.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • West & Dodge Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

    266 F. 557 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 7, 1920

    The price therein agreed upon was, by the terms of the contract between the defendant and the government, subject to the *558 approval of the compensation board of the Navy Department. … S. v. North American Commercial Co. (C. C.) 74 Fed. 145 ; Kugler v. U. S., 4 Ct. Cl. 407; Wilder v. U. S., 5 Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kendall v. Lyman

    161 F. 652 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 1908

    Gulbenkian v. Stranahan, United States Circuit Court, Southern District of New York, April 29, 1907 (T. D. 28,451) 158 Fed. 836 ; Klumpp v. … Since there was a technical breach of duty in the failure of the collector to transmit the papers to the Board of General Appraisers, as-required by section 14 of the customs administrative act of 1890, judgment should be

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Flowers

    981 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 12, 1997

    For example in United States v. … United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davidson v. Welch

    22 F. Supp. 726 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 4, 1938

    In Commissioner v. … I cannot follow the reasoning of the Board of Tax Appeals, nor adopt the decision in the Wells Case to the extent of ruling that the trust is the donee of the gift.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Baranek v. Kelly

    630 F. Supp. 1107 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 1986

    E.g., Sedlacek v. Hach, 752 F.2d 333 , 336 (8th Cir.1985). … Owens v. Rush, 636 F.2d 283, 287 (10th Cir.1980).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bird v. United States

    141 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 22, 1956

    The taxpayer filed with the then Board of Tax Appeals a petition for re-determination. In a companion case, Bass v. … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.