Case law

In Re Massachusetts Diet Drug Litigation

338 F. Supp. 2d 198 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 17, 2004

Brown, 2000 WL 1222042 at *39. … Malone et al. v. Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., 04-11205-GAO 95. Perschall et al. v. Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., 04-11206-GAO 96. Brown et al. v. Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., 04-11207-GAO 97.

Bolan v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.

48 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 31, 1942

The case of Uravic v. F. … Bassett, supra, a case arising under the Longshoremen’s Act, held a cook sleeping on board a tow-boat and engaged in river navigation was a “member of the crew”. [ 119 F.2d 999 .] Cf. Puget Sound Freight Lines v.

United States v. Sisson

297 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 1, 1969

Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 , 81 S.Ct. 1680 , 6 L.Ed.2d 982 (1961). Cf. Sherbert v. … Verner, 374 U.S. 398, 404 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963); Everson v. *912 Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947).

Sonoiki v. Harvard University

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 22, 2020

Doe v. Brandeis Univ., 177 F. Supp. 3d 561, 593 (D. Mass. 2016) (citing Mangla v. Brown Univ., 135 F.3d 80, 83 (1st Cir. 1998)). … See Doe v. Brown Univ., 327 F. Supp. 3d 397, 417 (D.R.I. 2018) (dismissing claim of untimeliness where the investigation occurred during the summer when school was not in session); cf. Doe v.

Smith v. Bowker-Torrey Co.

199 F. 985 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 6, 1912

BROWN, District Judge. [1] The receiver’s petition alleges that Sanderson acted in the matter- to- which the petition relates as agent for the Waltham Trust Company, that the fact of said agency was undisclosed, and that’ … Ed. 1068 ; Kansas v. Colorado, 185 U. S. 125, 144, 145 , 22 Sup. Ct. 552, 46 L. Ed. 838 ; Rankin v. Miller (C. C.) 130 Fed. 229 .

United States v. Appell

259 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 7, 1966

His version leaves “1% inches of white envelope protruding above the edge of the brown advertising circular if viewed from one side, or 2% inches of white envelope protruding above the brown circular if viewed from the other … Having the foregoing in mind, I rule that no rights of Appell under the Miranda decision [Miranda v. State of Arizona], 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), or the Escobedo decision [Escobedo v.

United States v. Dubin

217 F. Supp. 206 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 3, 1963

(See the opinion of Wyzanski, J. in United States v. Conway, D.Mass., 217 F.Supp. 853 . … Giordenello v. United States, 357 U.S. 480 , 78 S.Ct. 1245 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1503 .

Harding v. The Maverick

16 F. Cas. 1186 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1842

In the ease cited by him, of Atkinson v. … The cases of Rex v. Dickenson, 1 Saund. 135; Anonymous, 3 Salk. 25; Rex v.

BRAWDERS v. Astrue

793 F. Supp. 2d 485 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 24, 2011

.”); Berrios Lopez v. … V.

Strahan v. AT&T Mobility LLC

270 F. Supp. 3d 535 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 13, 2017

Martinez v. Colon, 54 F.3d 980, 984 (1st Cir. 1995) (quoting Chongris v. Board of Appeals, 811 F.2d 36, 40 (1st Cir. 1987)). Here, Strahan’s claims turn on whether defendant acted under color of state law. … Klunder v. Brown Univ., 778 F.3d 24, 30 (1st Cir. 2015) (quoting Estades-Negroni v. CPC Hosp. San Juan Capestrano, 412 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2005) (alteration in original)).

Doe v. Hale Hospital

369 F. Supp. 970 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 30, 1974

In Roe v. … From the above quotations from Roe v.

Capurso

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 9, 2026

Contributory Retirement Appeal Board et al., Docket No. 2584CV03483 (Docket No. 24-2). … Wang v.

Ritter v. Durand Chevrolet, Inc.

932 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 30, 1996

In Alexander v. Continental Motor Werks, Inc., 1996 WL 79403 (N.D.Ill. … As the court in Shields v.

Pacensa v. Astrue

848 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2012

The hearing officer’s decision was selected for review by the Decision Review Board (the “Board”). Id. … V.

Kling v. Fidelity Management Trust Co.

323 F. Supp. 2d 132 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 23, 2004

Co. v. … V.

United States v. Brennan

832 F. Supp. 435 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 29, 1991

See United State v. … United States v. Norberg, 612 F.2d 1, 4-6 (1st Cir.1979); United States v. Bush, 599 F.2d 72, 75-77 , (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Braverman, 522 F.2d 218, 223 (7th Cir. 1975); United States v.

Braintree Baptist Temple v. Holbrook Public Schools

616 F. Supp. 81 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 18, 1984

Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 594 F.2d 489 (5th Cir.1979), (quoting Campbell v. Gadsden County District School Board, 534 F.2d 650, 656 (5th Cir.1976)). … Board of Education v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236, 245-46 , 88 S.Ct. 1923, 1927-28 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1968).

Krodel v. Bayer Corp.

400 F. Supp. 2d 345 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 12, 2005

Arthur Brown (“Dr. Brown”) which stated: Approve. … Diaz v.

Carye v. Long Beach Mortgage Co.

470 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 22, 2007

Regulation Z, promulgated by the Federal Reserve Board, is considered an authoritative interpretation of TILA. … The Board-published official staff commentary to Regulation Z is dispositive in TILA cases unless the commentary is demonstrably irrational. Ford Motor Credit Co. v.

Biogen Idec MA, Inc. v. Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

38 F. Supp. 3d 162 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 22, 2014

Murphy v. United States, 45 F.3d 520, 522 (1st Cir.1995). … Co. v.