Case law

B & R Realty Co. v. Springfield Redevelopment Authority

708 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 16, 1989

The statute requires all contracts over $2,000 made by any department, board or commission to be signed by the mayor. It is undisputed that the May- or did not sign the B & R-SRA contract. See Ungerer v. … The beginning point is Cardullo v.

Morgan v. McDonough

511 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 25, 1981

United States v. Board of Education of Waterbury, supra at 577. … Northcross v. Board of Ed. of Memphis, supra, at 635-636. 5 .

Fraser v. Major League Soccer, L.L.C.

97 F. Supp. 2d 130 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 19, 2000

See Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 (1918) (Brandéis, J.) … See Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320-22 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962) (§ 7 is a means for preventing the reduction of competition in existing markets); SCM Corp. v.

In re Smith

22 F. Cas. 394 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 15, 1871

In re Eeles [Case No. 4,302]; Wakeman v. Hoyt [Id. 17,051]. … Hankey v. Jones, Cowp. 745. And see Com. Dig. “Bankrupt,” B; Henley (Eden) Bankr. c. 1; Ex parte Gibbs, 2 Rose, 38; Patten v. Browne, 7 Taunt. 409.

Gordon v. Parker

83 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 1949

Co. v. Brown, 234 U.S. 542, 547 , 34 S.Ct. 955 , 58 L.Ed. 1457 ; Loucks v. … Brown, 302 Mass. 432, 433 , 19 N.E.2d 732 ; Murphy v. Smith, 307 Mass. 64, 65 , 29 N.E.2d 726 ; Peterson v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 310 Mass. 45, 47 , 36 N.E.2d 701 .

Colonial Tavern, Inc. v. Byrne

420 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 21, 1976

The suspension was imposed for violation of a midnight closing hour previously ordered by the Licensing Board. … Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon Corporation, 373 F.Supp. 191, 203 (S.D.N.Y.1974).

In re Sawyer

21 F. Cas. 559 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 11, 1876

App. 563; Hart v. Smith, L. R. 4 Q. B. 61; Ex parte Russell, 10 Ch. App. 255; Ex parte Greaves, 5 Ch. App. 326; Ex parte Deacon. 4 Ch. App. 87. Whether our courts would go so far. … Browne v. Carr, 7 Bing. 516; Hall v. Dyson, 17 Q. B. 785; Dexter v. Snow, 12 Cush. 595 .

Gillette Co. v. RB PARTNERS

693 F. Supp. 1266 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 30, 1988

Gould v. American Hawaiian Steamship, Co., 535 F.2d 761, 777 (3d Cir.1976). 3 . J.I. Case Co. v. Borak, 377 U.S. 426, 431-32 , 84 S.Ct. 1555, 1559 , 12 L.Ed.2d 423 (1964); Mills v. … Electronic Specialty Co. v.

Brayton v. Welch

39 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 6, 1941

Botchford v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra; Fisher v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 59 F.2d 192, 193 . In the case of Levey v. … Schumacher v. United States, Ct.Cl., 55 F.2d 1007 ; Noel v. Parrott, 4 Cir., 15 F.2d 669, 671 .

American Printing Co. v. United States

53 F.2d 98 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 22, 1931

Authority for this view is found in several decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals. L. H. Philo Corporation v. Commissioner, 16 B. T. A. 130; Hewett Grain & Provision Co. v. Commissioner, 14 B. T. … Remington Rand v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 33 E.(2d) 77; Sweets Co. of America v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 40 E.(2d) 436. The Board of Tax Appeals in Canal-Commercial National Bank v. Commissioner, 22 B. T.

Pacensa v. Astrue

848 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 26, 2012

The hearing officer’s decision was selected for review by the Decision Review Board (the “Board”). Id. … V.

Perkins v. Hill

19 F. Cas. 249 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 15, 1846

But Green did not see fit to put these goods on board, but permitted the respondent to lade them,in his own name, and as his own property, under a contract between him and the libellant. … This ease is very similar to that of Churchill v.

Shorey v. Rennell

22 F. Cas. 1 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 15, 1858

They doubtless had received from the mate, while on shore, and after they came on board, an inflamed statement of what had taken place in the morning, and their coming on board, as they did, with so many men armed with deadly … Upon the authority of the case of Jordan v. Williams [Case No. 7.528), the captain must be exonerated from liability for the imprisonment on shore, by the order and warrant of the consul.

Flipp v. Town of Rockland

613 F. Supp. 2d 141 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 30, 2009

Gibbons refused, howev *143 er, and the union appealed his refusal to the Rockland Board of Selectmen which ordered to the Board of Assessors to fill the vacant position in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement … Corp. v.

Bolan v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.

48 F. Supp. 266 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 31, 1942

The case of Uravic v. F. … Bassett, supra, a case arising under the Longshoremen’s Act, held a cook sleeping on board a tow-boat and engaged in river navigation was a “member of the crew”. [ 119 F.2d 999 .] Cf. Puget Sound Freight Lines v.

In Re Massachusetts Diet Drug Litigation

338 F. Supp. 2d 198 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 17, 2004

Brown, 2000 WL 1222042 at *39. … Malone et al. v. Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., 04-11205-GAO 95. Perschall et al. v. Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., 04-11206-GAO 96. Brown et al. v. Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., 04-11207-GAO 97.

Samuel Sanday & Co. v. United States

6 F. Supp. 597 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 20, 1934

Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp’n v. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. (The West Aleta), 276 U. S. 202 , 48 S. Ct. 256 , 72 L. Ed. 531 . … Brodnax et al. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, and No. 509, Mercantile Trading Co. v.

Crane v. Hershey

296 F. Supp. 944 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 3, 1969

Selective Service System Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 , Dec. 16, 1968. It is clear from a reading of both Oestereich, supra, and of Clark v. … Rather, the instant record reflects that the Local Board defendants herein have made a “determination of fact and an exercise of judgment.” Clark v. Gabriel, supra, 89 S.Ct. at 426.

Strahan v. AT&T Mobility LLC

270 F. Supp. 3d 535 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 13, 2017

Martinez v. Colon, 54 F.3d 980, 984 (1st Cir. 1995) (quoting Chongris v. Board of Appeals, 811 F.2d 36, 40 (1st Cir. 1987)). Here, Strahan’s claims turn on whether defendant acted under color of state law. … Klunder v. Brown Univ., 778 F.3d 24, 30 (1st Cir. 2015) (quoting Estades-Negroni v. CPC Hosp. San Juan Capestrano, 412 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2005) (alteration in original)).

United States v. Sisson

297 F. Supp. 902 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 1, 1969

Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 , 81 S.Ct. 1680 , 6 L.Ed.2d 982 (1961). Cf. Sherbert v. … Verner, 374 U.S. 398, 404 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963); Everson v. *912 Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1, 15-16 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947).