Case law

Lopes v. Riendeau

177 F. Supp. 3d 634 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 2016

(Docket Entry #94, pp. 3, 6-8) (citing Shaheed-Muhammad v. Dipaolo, 393 F.Supp.2d 80 (D.Mass.2005), and Brown v. Massachusetts, 950 F.Supp.2d 274, 278 (D.Mass.2013)). … On February 22, 2013, plaintiff wrote another letter to the Registration Board. .

Wayfield v. Town of Tisbury

925 F. Supp. 880 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 21, 1996

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957) (application for bar examination); Lowe v.

O'Neil v. Sears

18 F. Cas. 717 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1862

In the case of Cushing v. The John Fraser, 21 How. [62 U. … It is said the respondent had a right to presume that there was an anchor-watch on board the January.

United States v. Twenty-Six Diamond Rings

28 F. Cas. 288 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1855

He had other similar goods on board, which were actually entered upon the manifest. … S. v. Riddle. 5 Cranch [9 U. S.] 311.

In re Bates Mach. Co.

91 F. 625 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 28, 1899

In Sargent v. Webster, 13 Metc. … It is to be noticed that the decision in Sargent v. Webster has little practical application to the directors of manufacturing corporations in Massachusetts at the present time.

Sheet Metal & Air ConditionIng Contractors Ass'n of the Building Trades Employers Ass'n v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n

619 F. Supp. 1073 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 15, 1985

Courier-Citizen v. … United States v. W.T.

Cintron v. JetBlue Airways Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 15, 2018

Bower v. EgyptAir Airlines Co., 731 F.3d 85, 93 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting Brown v. United Airlines, Inc., 720 F.3d 60, 63 (1st Cir. 2013)). … Id. at 97 (citing Rowe v. N.H. Motor Transp.t Ass’n, 552 U.S. 364, 373 (2008); Morales, 504 U.S. at 378-79)). In this case, Cintron was already on board the aircraft.

Atkins v. White

3 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 2, 1933

Harbison v. Commissioner, 26 B. T. A. 896; Bliss v. Commissioner, 27 B. T. A. 205; Colgate v. Commissioner, 27 B. T. A. 506. These decisions have not stood the test of further consideration. … See Straus v. Commissioner, decided April 6, 1933, by the-Board of Tax Appeals. The defendant’s demurrer is overruled.

Motta v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service

869 F. Supp. 80 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 29, 1994

It expressly stated: Even if we assumed that former counsel’s failure initially to secure full review by the Board was so harmful as to have caused a denial of due process had the proceedings stopped at that point, the Board … become final upon dismissal of an appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals ... or upon expiration of the time allotted for appeal when no appeal is taken”); Gonzalez-Julio v.

Stanton v. Lighthouse Financial Services, Inc.

621 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 25, 2009

V. … In Council v.

Swain v. Howland

23 F. Cas. 483 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1858

Lovrein v. Thompson [Case No. 8,557]; Gladding v. Constant [Id. 5,468]. 1 am glad to find it sustained by the authority of Judge Ware. Gifford v. Kollock [Id. 5,409]. NOTE. … Coffin v. Shaw [Id. 2.952], That the statute does not supersede the general doctrine of the maritime law, or repeal it, see Cloutman v. Tunison [Id. 2,907]: Coffin v. Jenkins [Id. 2.948]: Burton v.

Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Branch Motor Express Co.

308 F. Supp. 1228 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 16, 1970

In fact, it was not until July, 1966, when boards produced by use of the machine were found to satisfy certain Navy Department tests that development had reached a stage where the boards produced by the machine could be offered … Gardner v. Mid-Continent Grain Co., 8 Cir., 168 F.2d 819 . Defendant’s claim against Airlift is based on alleged negligence in two respects.

Mourgis v. Hershey

301 F. Supp. 1034 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 24, 1969

Plaintiff’s reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court in Oestereich v. Selective Service System, Local Board No. 11, et al., 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968), is misplaced. … Because of the necessity of that exercise of discretion and judgment by the board, Oestereich is inapplicable vis-a-vis the particular type deferment claimed here. It has been so held in Kolden v.

Knights of Columbus v. Town of Lexington

124 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Dec 6, 2000

Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette, 515 U.S. 753, 761 , 115 S.Ct. 2440 , 132 L.Ed.2d 650 (1995). Here, the Lexington Board of Selectmen simply followed that suggestion. b. … Hill v.

Watkins v. OMNI LIFE SCIENCE, INC.

692 F. Supp. 2d 170 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 9, 2010

Plaintiffs rely solely on an opinion of this court, Brown v. Quest Diagnos tics, LLC, 2008 WL 5236033 (D.Mass. … Brown is inapposite. While the court expressed skepticism whether *176 Brown was in fact an intended third-party beneficiary, Brown at least was able to identify a supposed contractual agreement. See Reed v. Gen.

Plaisance v. Wrinkle

318 F. Supp. 242 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 30, 1970

The information to which the board referred was that contained in plaintiff’s letter of September 22. . United States v. … Ehlert v. United States, 9 Cir., 1970, 422 F.2d 332 , cert. granted, 1970, 397 U.S. 1074 , 90 S.Ct. 1525 , 25 L.Ed.2d 808 ; United States v. Schoebel, 7 Cir., 1963, 201 F.2d 31 ; United States v.

Wolff v. Jordan Marsh Co.

9 F. Supp. 516 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 29, 1935

A.) 27 F.(2d) 59 ; Trico Products Corporation v. Apco-Mossberg Corporation (C. C. A.) 45 F.(2d) 594, 598 ; Sheridan et al. v. Silver-Brown Co. (D. C.) 4 F. Supp. 759, 761 ]. … A.) 280 F. 277, 281 ; Sheridan et al. v. Silver-Brown Co., supra; Frick Co. v. Lindsay, supra, at page 61 of 27 F.(2d). So far as the evidence discloses, Wolff succeeded where others failed.

Yameen Ex Rel. Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth Fund 1.1 v. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

394 F. Supp. 2d 350 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 14, 2005

The Trust is governed by a six-member Board of Trustees (“Board”). Pursuant to a distribution agreement approved by the Board (“Distribution Agreement”), Distributors serves as the principal underwriter for the Fund. … Daily Income Fund v. Fox, 464 U.S. 523, 536 , 104 S.Ct. 831 , 78 L.Ed.2d 645 (1984)(quoting Burks v.

Manarolakis v. Coomey

416 F. Supp. 532 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 28, 1976

This decision was appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which on February 19, 1975 dismissed the appeal. … Lutwak v. United States, 344 U.S. 604 , 73 S.Ct. 481 , 97 L.Ed. 593 (1953); DeFigueroa v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 501 F.2d 191 (7th Cir. 1974); Silverman v. Rogers, supra, 437 F.2d at 107.

Austin v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.

644 F. Supp. 763 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 19, 1986

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California, 463 U.S. 1, 7 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2845 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983) (hereinafter Franchise Tax Board). … Franchise Tax Board, supra at 9, 103 S.Ct. at 2846 (citation omitted); accord Gully v.