Case law

In re Wilcox

94 F. 84 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 29, 1899

Hankey v. Garrat (1792) 3 Brown, Ch. 457; Id., 1 Ves. Jr. *92 286. … It may be found in 4 Brown, Ch. 548.

United States v. 176.10 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in the Towns of Truro & Wellfleet

558 F. Supp. 1379 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 1983

Ward v. … Planning Board of Franklin,-Mass.App.-, 1981 Mass.App.Adv.Sh. 2101, 429 N.E.2d 355 (zoning board of appeals lacks power to grant 14-foot variance from 200-foot frontage requirement); Contra, Cava *1383 naugh v.

Tremblay v. Marsh

584 F. Supp. 224 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 30, 1984

See e.g., Pence v. Brown, 627 F.2d 872 (8th Cir.1980); Santos v. Franklin, 493 F.Supp. 847 (E.D.Pa.1980); Withum v. O’Connor, 506 F.Supp. 1374 (D.P.R.1981). … Brown, 627 F.2d 872 (8th Cir. 1980), or ambiguity in the agreements themselves, Dubeau v. Commanding Officer, 440 F.Supp. 747 (D.Mass.1977), petitioner is bound by the contents of the agreements.

BALASUNDARAM v. Chadbourne

716 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 10, 2010

Flores-Powell v. Chadbourne, 677 F.Supp.2d 455, 477 (D.Mass.2010) (Wolf, C.J.). … See, e.g., Sesay v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 74 Fed.Appx. 84, 88 (2d Cir.2003) (upholding the Board of Immigration Appeal’s interpretation that “a grant of asylum necessarily entails an entry”).

B. A. Carroll Stevedoring Co. v. United States

25 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 31, 1938

The libellee was not compelled to furnish the latest invention in equipment for boarding and leaving vessels. … See The Berwindglen, supra; The Rheola, C.C., 19 F. 926 ; Burton v. Greig, 5 Cir., 271 F. 271 . Libel dismissed with costs.

In re Lupron® Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

729 F. Supp. 2d 492 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 6, 2010

Average Wholesale Price Litig., 588 F.3d 24 , 32-35 (1st Cir.2009); Masters v. Wilhelmina Model Agency, Inc., 473 F.3d 423, 436 (2d Cir.2007); and Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Ariz. … Tilly as its representative on the Oversight Board. Dr.

Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. Riley

207 F. 963 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 23, 1913

BROWN, District Judge. [1] This is a petition for a preliminary injunction against infringement of letters patent No. 644,664, March 6, 1900, to F. A. Daley, for furnace. … Browne, defendants’ expert, it is conceded that claims 3, 4, and 5 of the Daley patent are directed to an organization in which the fuel-supporting means need not be perfectly imperforate.

Lavash v. Kountze

473 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 10, 1979

See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569-70 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332-35 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976); Kelley v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709.

MASS. SCHOOL OF LAW AT ANDOVER v. American Bar

952 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 10, 1997

See, e.g., Hubert v. Melrose-Wakefield Hosp. … See, e.g., Linkage Corp. v.

Padmanabhan, MD PhD v. Hulka

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Apr 3, 2018

Bharani”) and his subsequent sanctioning by the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine (“BORIM” or “the Board”). … Goldstein v. Galvin, 719 F.3d 16, 23 (1st Cir. 2013) (citing Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Med., 832 N.E.2d 628 (Mass. 2005)); see also Airframe Sys., Inc. v.

Baker v. Goldman Sachs & Co.

656 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 15, 2009

Baker was not on the Board of Directors, was not a signatory of the Letter, and was not an addressee. See U.S. Borax & Chem. Corp. v. … Defendants point out- that one court ruled that an investment bank retained by a corporate board owed the shareholders no duty because there was no “relationship substantially approaching privity.” Meyer v.

Bliss v. Fisher

842 F. Supp. 2d 400 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 31, 2012

See Maher v. … See de la Torre v. Continental Ins.

United States v. Andrews

847 F. Supp. 2d 236 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 8, 2012

NBPD Officer David Brown had also seen Andrews entering and exiting the apartment on at least one other occasion. … Brown estimated that a person could run that distance in less than 30 seconds.

Leroux v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.

626 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 14, 1986

[Citations omitted] See also Brown v. … Brown v.

The Bessie J.

268 F. 66 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 19, 1920

Co. v. Great Lakes D. & D. Co., 256 Fed. 497 , 168 C. C. A. 3 . Nor is there any question but that a partially loaded vessel ought not to have been left to lie through the night with no one on board. … It had no system of following up its barge captains to ascertain whether they stayed on board at night, and it took no steps to see that Mr. Page’s order was obeyed.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Gladstone

895 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 18, 1995

United States v. … See FDIC v.

United States v. Stockwell

355 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 7, 1973

This Court therefore finds that the Board was clearly within its bounds in refusing defendant a medical deferment. United States v. … The regulations grant the Local Board wide discretion in determining whether or not to reopen. Id. at § 1625.2, § 1625.4. Mulloy v.

Turnley v. Banc of America Investment Services, Inc.

576 F. Supp. 2d 204 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 17, 2008

Passantino v. … Cormier v.

Cole v. CENTRAL STATES SE AND SW AREAS HEALTH

225 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 30, 2002

Seitz v. Board of Trustees, 953 F.Supp. 100 , 102 (S.D.N.Y.1997). As has been noted, Cole is not a beneficiary of the Plan. Rather, he is an assignee. … V.

Plourde v. Massachusetts Cities Realty Co.

47 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 3, 1942

Bowie v. Gonzalez, 1 Cir., 117 F.2d 11 . Consequently, the liability of an employer under the Act is something more than a debt or liability to an individual. See National Labor Relations Board v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, supra.