Case law

Pump, Inc. v. Collins Management, Inc.

746 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 9, 1990

Brown admitted in her deposition that she saw the Aerosmith logo “displayed in connection with the word ‘Pump.’ ” Brown Dep. at 29. … The other three acquaintances are Bonnie Brown ("Brown”), David Lamoreaux ("Lamo-reaux”), and Roy Vestutie ("Vestutie”). 9 .

Lyons v. American College of Veterinary Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Inc.

997 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 19, 2014

Moreover, the pendency of a proceeding before the PTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ought not discourage this Court from ruling on the propriety of registration. 15 See PHC, Inc. v. … Browne Drug Co. v.

Goldstein v. Town of Nantucket

477 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 25, 1979

At the end of the two-week period the Police Chief reported to the Board of *608 Selectmen that there had been “no problems”. … Loc. 590 v. Logan Val.

Bonifon v. Rodriguez

270 F. Supp. 3d 465 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 15, 2017

Before boarding the ship in Abidjan, Bonifon observed the ship’s activity to determine how to gain access. Bonifon has provided differing accounts as to how he boarded the ship. … Candreva v.

United States v. Parsons

27 F. Cas. 452 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 15, 1866

S. v. Hatch [Case No. 15,325]. But the case here is. that such a certificate was paid for and promised, and, I may well presume, it was given. … Matthews v. Offley [Case No. 9,290]. But supposing them to have no cause of complaint, I do not know that they are deemed incapable of settling their own affairs with the master.

Mallon v. Marshall

95 F. Supp. 3d 274 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2015

Facts Plaintiff joined the Defendant Marshall’s laboratory at Brown University in July 2008 as a post-doctoral research associate. See Complaint, Docket No. 1, ¶ 8. … Sys., Inc. v.

Morgan v. Nucci

617 F. Supp. 1316 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 3, 1985

Morgan v. … See, e.g., Arthur v. Nyquist, (2 Cir.1983) 712 F.2d 809, 813 . 3 .

Arloo v. Ashcroft

238 F. Supp. 2d 381 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 8, 2003

See Velasquez v. … (iii) If the Board Member determines that the decision should be affirmed without opinion, the Board shall issue an order that reads as follows: "The Board affirms, without opinion, the result of the decision below.

Minnesota v. Pharmacia Corp.

278 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 20, 2003

Montana v. Abbot Labs., 266 F.Supp.2d 250, 255-56 (D.Mass.2003). The linchpin of Pharmaeia’s argument is Franchise Tax Board, of the State of California v. … See Almond v.

Stendze v. Boat Neptune, Inc.

135 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 18, 1955

Pope & Talbot, Inc., v. Hawn, 346 U.S. 406 , 74 S.Ct. 202 , 98 L.Ed. 143 ; Bentley v. Albatross S. S. Co., 3 Cir., 203 F.2d 270 . I think it is clear that this is what they did. … In spite of the holding in Pacific Steamship Co. v.

San Luis Central Railroad v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.

369 F. Supp. 2d 172 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 13, 2005

providing transportation subject to the jurisdiction of the Board under this part. … Co. v. Surface Transp.

Stuart v. Hassett

41 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Nov 19, 1941

The Board of Tax Appeals, on the other hand, in the Estate of Edward T. Kelley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 22 B.T.A. 421 and Elizabeth F. Bowditch, Executrix, v. … I believe the view taken by the Board of Tax Appeals to be the sounder.

Tuli v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.

566 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jul 2, 2008

See Ruiz v. Posadas de San Juan Assocs., 124 F.3d 243, 248 (1st Cir.1997) (quoting Brown v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 891 F.2d 337, 346 (1st Cir.1989)). … [the reasons for the Credentials Committee’s decision] were obviously or manifestly unsupported.’ ” R & R at 49 (quoting Ruiz v. Posadas de San Juan Assocs., 124 F.3d 243, 248 (1st Cir.1997) (quoting Brown v.

Alston v. Town of Brookline

321 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · May 8, 2017

Plaintiff Gerald Alston brought this action against the Town of Brookline (the Town); the Brookline Board of Selectmen (the Board); various individuals who are either currently or at some point relevant to this action were … Berke v. Presstek, Inc., 188 F.R.D. 179, 180 (D.N.H. 1998). Carney v. Town of Weare, No. 15-CV-291-LM, 2016 WL 320128 , at *2 (D.N.H. Jan. 26, 2016) (footnote omitted); Holloman v. Clarke, No.

Moskow v. Wheeler

District Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 25, 2025

Current Residence: Dashel’s residence appears to be his parent’s house on Brown Street in Santa Rosa, California. … He listed the Brown Street address in Santa Rosa, California in connection with his position at the golf club.

Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. Boston Line and Service Co.

286 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 11, 1968

Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, 2 Cir., 301 F.2d 403 . … United States v. Tug Manzanillo, 9 Cir., 310 F.2d 220 .

Paulding v. Allen

300 F. Supp. 2d 247 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 7, 2004

In Commonwealth v. Brown, 392 Mass. 632 , 467 N.E.2d 188 (1984), the Supreme Judicial Court had held that Mass. Gen. … Brown, 392 Mass. at 645 , 467 N.E.2d 188 (citing Commonwealth v. Dickerson, 372 Mass. 783, 795-96 , 364 N.E.2d 1052 (1977)). 2 .

The Cheshire

5 F. Cas. 579 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 15, 1861

If it were proved that it was customary, and that this cake was put on board no more than ordinarily wet, I am not sure how this case would be decided. The case of Baxter v. … [Case No. 3,027]; Bearse v. Ropes [Id. 1,192],

Luscom v. Osgood

15 F. Cas. 1115 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 15, 1844

The captain well knew that the father was entitled to the services of the son, who had escaped from his control, and was then rendering services on board this ship. … As to remedy of parent against ship-owner, for abduction of his minor child, and the measure of damages, see Lovrein v. Thompson [Case No. 8,557]; Sherwood v. Hall [Id. 12,777]; Steele v.

In Re Sonus Networks, Inc. Shareholder Derivative

422 F. Supp. 2d 281 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 31, 2006

Kobrin v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 444 Mass. 837, 843-44 , 832 N.E.2d 628 (2005) citing Tuper v. North Adams Ambulance Serv., Inc., 428 Mass. 132, 134-35 , 697 N.E.2d 983 (1998). … See Sena v.