Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
948 results
0.93s
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 16, 2021
Defendants also attack the issue of causation before finally arguing the officers are entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s failure to accommodate claim. See id. at 17-20. A. … At the current stage, this is sufficient to establish a genuine dispute of material fact and any argument that Jailers were unaware of his bed sores or how to prevent their worsening cannot be accepted.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTraylor v. Southern Components Inc
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 1, 2019
To do so, a Title VII plaintiff must establish that he or she: (1) is a member of a protected group; (2) was qualified for the position at issue; (3) was discharged or suffered some adverse employment … Because his termination is clearly an adverse employment action, the question is whether Traylor can establish a causal connection between his announcement to Wells that he would file an EEOC charge and his termination
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 4, 2025
Clearly, Plaintiff has not satisfied the “actual injury” requirement as he makes no claims of injury in his complaint or amended complaints. … There is no clearly defined law which would require the doctor or nurse to examine and question Plaintiff in a particular setting or in extreme privacy.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVaughn v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · May 19, 2021
Thus, the first criteria of the DSM-5 for PTSD is clearly not satisfied, according to Hobby Lobby. … Orazio is without question qualified to diagnose the condition of PTSD. Vaughn further asserts that, in addition to being qualified to render a diagnosis of PTSD, Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLouisiana Environmental Society, Inc. v. Brinegar
407 F. Supp. 1309 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 28, 1976
Had Congress intended that the amendment had a retroactive effect, that purpose of course would have been clearly shown in the amendment itself. … For example, the Introduction to the EIS Supplement clearly establishes that it was the federal defendants critical analysis which prompted the preparation of the Supplement.
Cited 7 timesPublished162 F. Supp. 2d 517 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 20, 2001
An impairment that manifests only some of those criteria, no matter how severely, does not qualify. Sullivan v. Zebley, 110 S.Ct. at 891 . Listing 11.11 states: 11.11 Anterior poliomyelitis. With: A. … Baker’s diagnosis of depression did not clearly state it was connected to his alcoholism. However, in the assessment of ability to do work-related activities, Dr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWalling v. Peavy-Wilson Lumber Co.
49 F. Supp. 846 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 15, 1943
The record fully establishes that this was a room added to his house by Sam Jones with free lumber, and on which he paid no rent. … Up to October 7, 1940, this organization made loans to its members only but as of that date it qualified under the Florida Small Loan Act, F.
Cited 23 timesPublishedD & J Investments of Cenla L L C v. Baker Hughes a G E Co L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 11, 2021
(stating that “[i]mposing a duty on DEQ to bear the cost of testing and remediating sites upon which material has been allegedly deposited from a private drilling company would clearly be contrary to the policy set forth … While Eleventh Amendment immunity is a jurisdictional matter, preclusion is not.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 26, 2024
When a case is at the pleading stage, a plaintiff must “clearly . . . allege facts demonstrating each element” of the standing requirement. Landrum v. Blackbird Enterps., LLC, 214 F.Supp.3d 566, 569 (S.D. … Accordingly, it appears plaintiffs have no claim of injury qualifying for Article III standing.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 18, 2019
The legislature clearly intended the LPLA to serve as the only means of recovery against a manufacturer for damage caused by their product. … There the courts found the LPLA’s exclusivity provision was not applicable because manufacturers cannot use the LPLA as a shield to immunize them from all tort liability.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 20, 2021
Plaintiffs have established, and Defendants do not dispute, that the ADA and RA apply to DWCC. Pa. Dep’t of Corr. v. … The Court, therefore, concludes that Plaintiffs have established the requirements to certify a class under Rule 23(b)(2).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 8, 2024
dismissal of the complaint, or any portion thereof, if the Court finds it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … Courts are also afforded the unusual power to pierce the veil of the factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 11, 2024
dismissal of the complaint, or any portion thereof, if the Court finds it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … Courts are also afforded the unusual power to pierce the veil of the factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSylvester v. Talos Energy Offshore L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 25, 2024
An expert witness is qualified by their “knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.” Fed. R. Evid. 702. … Gruber, the Fifth Circuit established four factors to consider when determining whether a party was justified in failing to disclose an expert witness. 2023 WL 8643633, at *4.
Cited 0 timesUnknown848 F. Supp. 1258 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 28, 1994
The Fifth Circuit clearly held in Landry that an organization which gained benefit from its agent’s wrongful acts might be held vicariously liable under § 1962(b). 901 F.2d at 425 (citing Liquid Air Corp. v. … The court in the leading Spiegel case warned, however, that “[n]or should our opinion be read to immunize lawyers who are principals in a fraudulent scheme.” 609 F.Supp. at 1089 .
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 22, 2019
Plaintiff reported to SPD on June 26, 2017, to qualify with his service weapon. Id. at { 22. … Moreover, “[s]incerity is generally presumed or easily established.” Moussazadeh, 703 F.3d at 791.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohnson Controls, Inc. v. Guidry
724 F. Supp. 2d 612 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jul 12, 2010
Even then, the geographic territory of the Lafayette branch was not clearly defined; the western boundary fluctuated (initially ending at Crowley and thereafter ending in Jennings) and the northern boundary was non-existent … Determining whether information qualifies as trade secrets is a question of fact. Ferrellgas, 2010 WL 1010831 , at *7 citing Corrosion Specialties and Supply, Inc. v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedCharlie Jerome Lee v. Bossier Parish Sheriff’s Department, ET AL.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 11, 2026
dismissal of the complaint, or any portion thereof, if the Court finds it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … Courts are also afforded the unusual power to pierce the veil of the factual allegations and dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGodfrey v. Honeywell International Inc
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 17, 2022
Godfrey thus has failed to establish a prima facie case of race discrimination. … Godfrey also contends that these white co-workers clearly did not just return from FMLA leave. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDevelopers Surety & Indemnity Co v. Cercontec L L C
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 13, 2020
However, a default judgment does not establish the amount of damages. Id. … Factors relevant to the entry of a default judgment include whether material issues of fact are at issue, whether there has been substantial prejudice, whether the grounds for default are clearly established
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna