Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterslawd

948 results

1.45s

  • Peart v. Chaze

    13 F.2d 908 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · May 14, 1926

    All of this I think clearly indicates a continuing desire that the' money should be paid to his mother. … The intent to designate the niece as residuary beneficiary is explicitly established.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Miner v. Johns

    589 B.R. 51 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · May 23, 2018

    In reaching this conclusion the Prigge court noted that Congress added section 1322(f) to the Code, which clearly states that payments for 401(k) loans are not to be considered disposable income. Id. at 677 . … The "means test" utilizes the National and Local Standards established by the IRS for expenses in a given location.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corporation

    360 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jun 25, 1973

    Francis Nell Higginbotham, is the duly qualified testamentary executrix of the Succession of Marshall K. … Higginbotham, the personal representative of his estate, and the duly qualified tutrix of Donna Joyce Higginbotham. 2. At the time of the accident, Marshall K.

    Reversed on other grounds by Higginbotham v. Mobil Oil Corp., 545 F.2d 422 (1977)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Calcasieu Parish School Board

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Apr 22, 2022

    Texas Workforce Com’n-Civil Rights Div., 775 F.3d 685 (5th Cir. 2014), “We have held that a plaintiff may establish pretext by demonstrating that he was ‘clearly better qualified’ such that ‘the qualifications are … Indeed, an employee’s “better education, work experience, and longer tenure with the company do not establish that he is clearly better qualified.” Price, 283 F.3d at 723.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sewell v. United States

    629 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 24, 1986

    Holton, who was the only qualified radiologist who testified, was of the opinion that the bone scan and the x-rays taken at the VA were inconsistent. Dr. … The plaintiff, of course, carries the burden of establishing these damages by a preponderance of the evidence.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Louisiana Ex Rel. Guste v. United States

    656 F. Supp. 1310 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 19, 1986

    The plaintiffs’ position ignores the permissive nature of the revenue sharing authority established in § 8(g)(3). … Accordingly, MGF should have been aware that it could not qualify to receive disclosure of protected material under Paragraph 2(e) of the order.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • United States v. Louisiana

    952 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 24, 1997

    Lopez, Clark, and Allen clearly counsel otherwise. … Three well-established principles guide our analysis.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. State of La.

    952 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 24, 1997

    Lopez, Clark, and Allen clearly counsel otherwise. … Three well-established principles guide our analysis.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fontenot v. United States (In re Fontenot)

    153 B.R. 165 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jan 25, 1993

    The testimony clearly establishes the following facts: 1. Ms. Fontenot did not have the financial wherewithal to acquire the business. … Mere negligence does not establish willfulness. Gustin, 876 F.2d at 492 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Broussard v. Missouri Pac. R.

    47 F. Supp. 750 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Nov 27, 1942

    Kennedy, who, at the time, was the duly qualified agent for service of process of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, the corporation ; a second, reading in part: “ ‘John W. … Thompson, Trustee, Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor, through his designated and qualified agent for the service of process in Louisiana, H.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Francis v. Ouachita Parish Corrections

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Sep 6, 2024

    Here, the Court should dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against these entities and groups because they do not qualify as juridical persons. See Cozzo v. … A plaintiff must establish that a prison official “refused to treat him, ignored his complaints, intentionally treated him incorrectly, or engaged in any similar conduct that would clearly evince a wanton disregard for

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rasmussen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

    675 F. Supp. 1497 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 23, 1987

    Clearly, the individual policy does not constitute a “plan” within the meaning of ERISA. … Clearly, this result is inconsistent with the policy and express language of ERISA.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Wright v. SOUTHWESTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    364 F. Supp. 981 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Aug 1, 1972

    The evidence clearly shows that that phrase was not meant to give Wright an exclusive position with the Company in writing tax-sheltered annuities. … a) No service commissions will be allowed with respect to any policy unless the application on which it is issued is received by the Company at its Home Office in a contract year of the basic contract in which the Agent qualifies

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bourgeois v. United States Coast Guard

    151 F. Supp. 3d 726 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Dec 17, 2015

    Co., 1995 WL-110593 (E.D.La.1995) (“[a]s a person of Cajun descent, [the plaintiff] qualified as minority under the statute proscribing discrimination based on national origin.”). … The plaintiff further argues the foregoing evidence is clearly related to thé employment decisions at issue and, also, constitutes direct evidence of discrimination.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sinclair v. Beacon Gasoline Co.

    447 F. Supp. 5 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Jun 14, 1976

    . § 201 , et seq., had a two-pronged purpose of establishing a minimum wage and setting forth a maximum workweek beyond which overtime compensation would be due to qualifying employees. 29 U.S.C. §§ 206 , 207. … Clearly, then, drivers of motor vehicles of private carriers of property by motor vehicle are not entitled to overtime compensation under 29 U.S.C. § 207 (a)(1).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Frazier

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Mar 24, 2026

    The plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that equitable tolling applies. Rotella v. Pederson, 144 F.3d 892 (5th Cir. 1998); see also Ramirez v. … Here, the Sabine Parish Sheriff’s Office does not qualify as a juridical person. See Cozzo v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Purvis

    District Court, W.D. Louisiana · May 7, 2026

    dismissal of the complaint, or any portion thereof, if the Court finds it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … A plaintiff must establish that a prison official “refused to treat him, ignored his complaints, intentionally treated him incorrectly, or engaged in any similar conduct that would clearly evince a wanton disregard for

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Grant v. Farm Credit Bank of Texas

    841 F. Supp. 186 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 27, 1992

    Plaintiff clearly fails to state a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against any of the defendants. 2. … Indeed, Plaintiff fails to establish the existence of any contractual rights with which FCBT might of interfered.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harrison v. Glendel Drilling Co.

    679 F. Supp. 1413 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 22, 1988

    The facts in the present case, however, are clearly distinguishable from those in Parker . … On the contrary, the facts and authorities establish and recognize the need for local and state control of medical malpractice claims.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

    293 F. Supp. 3d 600 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Feb 14, 2018

    Defendant argues that Plaintiff fails to establish a prima facie case of retaliation because he provides no evidence establishing that he participated in a protected activity. [Doc. No. 22-1, p. 21]. … Under this framework, an aggrieved employee must first establish a prima facie case of discrimination by demonstrating: "(a) she is disabled, has a record of having a disability, or is regarded as disabled, (b) she is qualified

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.