Case law

Simmons v. American Budget Plan, Inc.

386 F. Supp. 194 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 19, 1974

Rivers v. … See also Federal Reserve Board Advisory Letter of September 28, 1970, by Tynan Smith, Assistant Secretary, quoted in CCH Consumer Credit Guide ¶ 30,592. 24 . 15 U.S.C. § 1640 . See Killings v.

Pennzoil Exploration and Production Co. v. Lujan

751 F. Supp. 602 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jun 8, 1990

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … Kentucky appealed the charges, and the Board of Land Appeals reversed.

Harris Builders, L.L.C. v. URS Corp.

861 F. Supp. 2d 746 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 19, 2012

Waste & Pollution Control Co. v. … See S & W Enter., L.L.C. v.

National Oil Transport Co. v. United States

18 F.2d 305 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 2, 1927

Downs v. Wall (C. C. A.) 176 F. 657 ; Watts v. Camors, 115 U. S. 353 , 6 S. Ct. 91 , 29 L. Ed. 406 , and the eases there cited. … Begley v. Morgan, 15 La. 162 , 35 Am. Dec. 188 ; Bradhury v. Johnson, 41 Me. 582 , 66 Am. Dec. 264 ; Ring v. Franklin, 2 New York Super. Ct. 9; United States v. The Amistead, 40 U. S. (15 Pet.) 518, 594 , 10 L.

Duhon v. Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 20, 2021

Co., Inc. v. U.S. Dist. … (quoting Royal Smit Transformers BV v. HC BEA-LUNA M/V, No. 16-14647, 2017 WL 819243, at *8 (E.D. La.

Banks

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 16, 2026

JAMES PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, * SECTION “P” (2) ET AL. … v. Chrysler Corp., No. 97-3012, 1998 WL 186728, at *1 (E.D. La.

Duhon v. Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 20, 2021

(citing Lollar v. Baker, 196 F.3d 603, 609 (5th Cir. 1999)). 37 PGA Tour, Inc. v. … V.

Singleton v. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n

413 F. Supp. 1092 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 5, 1976

State Board of Law Examiners, 8 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 699, 705 ; Chaney v. … Whitfield v. Illinois Board of Law Examiners, 7 Cir. 1974, 504 F.2d 474, 477-78 ; see also Feldman v. State Board of Law Examiners, 8 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 699, 703 .

Morse v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 28, 2020

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA RICHARD MORSE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 19-9240 BOARD … See Goudeau v.

Dameron v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury

336 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 6, 1971

The number of members of the School Board after reapportionment is set by the Board itself pursuant to State statute. … Mundt, 1971, 403 U.S. 182 , 91 S.Ct. 1904, 1907 , 29 L.Ed.2d 399 ; Sailors v. Board of Education of Kent County, 1967, 387 U.S. 105, 110-111 , 87 S.Ct. 1549, 1553 , 18 L.Ed.2d 650 .

Chotin Transportation, Inc. v. M/V HUGH C. BLASKE

356 F. Supp. 388 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 15, 1972

In Ellis Towing and Transportation Co. v. … And recently in the case of China Union Lines v. A. O.

Hauser v. AMERICAN CENTRAL INSURANCE CO., ST. LOUIS, MO.

216 F. Supp. 318 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 11, 1963

No information was ever conveyed to defendant or Godchaux & Mayer, Ltd. to indicate that the stove was still on board. X. … Co. v.

Antares Maritime Pte Ltd. v. Board of Commissioners for the Port of New Orleans

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jan 29, 2021

“Board”). … (quoting Little v.

Price v. United States

11 F.2d 283 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 30, 1925

Freeman v. United Fruit Co., 111 N. E. 789 , 223 Mass. 300 ; Philadelphia & Reading R. Co. v. Derby, 14 How. 468 , 14 L. Ed. 502 -509; N. O. M. & C. Ry. Co. v. Hanning, 82 U. S. (15 Wall.) 649 , 21 L. … Co. v. Bryant, 65 F. 969 -976, 13 C. C. A. 249 ; St. L. & S. W. Ry. Co. v. Harvey, 144 F. 806 , 75 C. C. A. 536 ; Del. L. & W. R. Co. v. Pittinger (C. C. A.) 293 F. 853 -855.

Dagnall v. Department of Highways, State of La.

466 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 21, 1979

And, in Vargas v. … Simmons v. Beauregard Parish School Board, 315 So.2d 883 (La.App.1975) writ refused 320 So.2d 207 (1975); Callahan v. Town of Bunkie, 287 So.2d 629 (La.App.1973).

Gunaldo v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 10, 2020

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007); Cuvillier v. Taylor, 503 F.3d 397, 401 (5th Cir. 2007). … Jones v. Flagship Int’l, 793 F.2d 714, 722 (5th Cir. 1986). If the employer offers a defense, the plaintiff must then show that the purported reason is a pretext for discrimination. Browning v.

Avery v. United States

382 F. Supp. 649 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 24, 1974

Docket # 73-3089, decided May 9, 1974) See United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443 , 92 S.Ct. 589 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 592 (1972); Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736 , 68 S.Ct. 1252 , 92 L.Ed. 1690 (1948); Haynie v. … United States, 474 F.2d 1051 (C.A. 5, 1973); United States v. Espinoza, 481 F.2d 553 (C.A. 5, 1973); Franchi v. United States, 464 F.2d 1035 (C.A. 5, 1972); Lipscomb v. Clark, 468 F.2d 1321 (C.A. 5, 1972); Russo v.

Magri v. Giarrusso

379 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 7, 1974

McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 [, 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 ] (1963); Damico v. California, 389 U.S. 416 , [, 88 S.Ct. 526 , 19 L.Ed.2d 647 ] (1967).” … In Davis v.

Hodges v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Aug 25, 2020

In terms of damages, the complaint alleges that "[a]s a result of the Board’s conduct. . . … Byrum v. Landreth, 566 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 2009) (quoting Speaks v. Kruse, 445 F.3d 396, 399–400 (5th Cir. 2006).

Fontenot v. Wade

318 F. Supp. 111 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 15, 1970

Gabriel, 393 U.S. 256 , 89 S.Ct. 424 , 21 L.Ed.2d 418 (1968); and Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 (1970). … This factual dispute has been resolved by the draft board against Mr. Fontenot. Thus, the case at bar comes within the factual framework of Clark v.