Case law

In re Everett

520 B.R. 498 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 29, 2014

ORDER AND REASONS NANNETTE JOLIVETTE BROWN, District Judge. Before the Court is Richard E. Everett’s (“Richard”), Independent Administrator of the Succession of Mark E. … In Mexic v.

J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co.

466 F. Supp. 353 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 2, 1979

Co. v. United States, 543 F.2d 71, 74-75 (CA 9-1976); United States Shipping Board Merchants Fleet Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. … Compare Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., supra, 348 U.S. 310 , with *366 Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365 U.S. 731 , 81 S.Ct. 886 , 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961). See also Irwin v. Eagle Star Ins.

United States v. Timonet

385 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 10, 1974

Who was the boarding agent on that ship? “A. Let me see, I really — I don’t remember. “Q. Do you recall who else went aboard with you on the Virgo? “A. The Cargo Bureau man. “Q. Do you remember who he was ? “A. … Parker, 244 F.2d 943 (7th Cir. 1957) ; United States v. Scully, 225 F.2d 113, 116 (2d Cir. 1955). . The Fifth Circuit in Brown v.

Ventura Maritime Co., Ltd. v. ADM Export Co.

44 F. Supp. 2d 804 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 9, 1999

The bill. was originally dated September 21, 1998, and also states that the date the soybean meal cargo was on board was September 21, 1998. … Co. v.

Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Marshall

441 F. Supp. 1110 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 25, 1977

See Perry v. Sindermann, 1972, 408 U.S. 593 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 ; Board of Regents of State Colleges v. … Brown. 1 . Executive Order 11246 became effective on October 24, 1965.

Grove v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.

553 F. Supp. 777 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 17, 1982

Tate v. American Tugs, Inc., supra; Caulfield v. A.C. & D. Marine, Inc., supra; Robinson v. Plimsoll, supra. … In Reardon v.

Williams v. Milwhite Sales Co.

197 F. Supp. 730 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 27, 1961

See Perez v. … For example, cooks on board vessels may be just as important as the navigators. Drillers, on vessels used as drilling rigs, may be more important than navigators.

Martin v. Jones

296 F. Supp. 878 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jan 3, 1968

Plaintiff, an employee of Halter Marine Service, boarded the vessel shortly after she arrived and began grinding down “burrs” on the after bulkhead. … A fellow employee, Earl Morgan, testified that plaintiff had just begun grinding as he, Morgan, was boarding the vessel.

Karim v. Finch Shipping Co. Ltd.

94 F. Supp. 2d 727 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 14, 2000

Prior to boarding the Panamanian flagged vessel in Rotterdam, Netherlands, Karim had passed an annual physical examination and had suffered no physical ailments. … See Brown v. Woodall 1955 PIQR 36 (Def.’s Ex. 47, Tab 17); Def.’s *742 Ex. 45 at 4. The total of the amounts for these various injuries ranges from £121,-190 ($193,904) to £165,350 ($264,560). See Def.’s Ex. 50.

Doctor's Hospital of Jefferson, Inc. v. Southeast Medical Alliance, Inc.

889 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 19, 1995

Healthcare, Inc. v. … the board until after the SMA board voted to exclude Doctor’s Hospital.

Norswearthy v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 21, 2023

The Rule does not, however, provide any standard for courts to use when determining when timely motions 5 Norswearthy v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., No. 17-3590, R. Doc. 69; Brown v. … Doc. 99; Rounds v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., No. 17-4576, R. Doc. 90. 6 Norswearthy, No. 17-3590, R. Doc. 71; Brown, Inc., No. 17-3516, R. Doc. 101; Rounds, No. 17-4576, R.

Ladue v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc.

733 F. Supp. 1075 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 26, 1990

In Triplette v. Exxon Corp., 554 So.2d 1361 (La.Ct.App. 1st Cir.1989), the court held that the removal and replacement of rotten boards in a cooling tower was not an ultrahazardous activity. … In Stine v.

Duhon v. Tatje

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 3, 2025

The LDF contends that Graves v. … In Graves v.

Canal Barge Co. v. China Ocean Shipping Co.

579 F. Supp. 243 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 1, 1984

Griffin, a half mile ahead on board DELTA TENN, was communicating with BIG ED, a northbound tow. … E.y., Transorient Navigators Company, S.A. v. M/S SOUTHWIND, 714 F.2d 1358 (5th Cir.1983). Allied Chemical Corporation v. Hess Tankship Company of Delaware, 661 F.2d 1044 (5th Cir.1981). 8.

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Odom Offshore Surveys, Inc.

697 F. Supp. 921 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 15, 1988

National Union contends that the policy it issued to Odom contained exclusions for professional services and the exclusions apply to the anchor positioning services Odom performed on board the M/V MR. … Accordingly, the court finds as a matter of law that the services rendered by the Odom survey crew on board the M/Y MR. OFFSHORE were professional services within the meaning of National Union’s exclusions. Womack v.

Rounds v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 21, 2023

The Rule does not, however, provide any standard for courts to use when determining when timely motions 5 Norswearthy v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., No. 17-3590, R. Doc. 69; Brown v. … Doc. 99; Rounds v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., No. 17-4576, R. Doc. 90. 6 Norswearthy, No. 17-3590, R. Doc. 71; Brown, Inc., No. 17-3516, R. Doc. 101; Rounds, No. 17-4576, R.

The Key West

11 F. 911 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 25, 1881

West out *912 in the stream and away from the burning Pagan, and then towed her over the river. (6) The Protector came in on the upper side of the Key West, as appears, in response to the call of one of the city firemen on board … It is hardly necessary to say that the facts in this case are decidedly different from those in the case of The Protector v. The Choteau, decided last term.

Patterson v. Morris

337 B.R. 82 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jan 25, 2006

. § 1452 (b); In re Ciclon Negro, Inc., 260 B.R. 832, 834 (S.D.Tex.2001)(citing Hawking v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 210 F.3d 540, 550 (5th Cir.2000) and Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069, 1076-77 (5th Cir. 1984)). … “Various formulations of the relevant considerations exist,” id., but most courts use those factors outlined in Browning v.

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Massengill

285 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · May 20, 1968

App.-1965), cert. den. 248 La. 442 , 179 So.2d 430 ; Polk Chevrolet, Inc. v. Vicaro, 162 So.2d 761 (La.App.-1964). . La.Civil Code, Art. 2091; W. F. Brown & Sons v. Easterly, 4 So.2d 73 (La.App. 1941). . 91 C..T.S. … Usury § 74; Winkle v. Scott, 99 F.2d 299 (C.A.8-1938); cert. den., 306 U.S. 634 , 59 S.Ct. 484 , 83 L.Ed. 1036 (1934); Fine v. H. Klein, Inc., 10 N.J.Super. 295 , 77 A.2d 295 (1950); Pardee v.

Short v. Manson Gulf, L.L.C.

543 F. Supp. 2d 563 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 29, 2008

See Prestenbach v. … But see Gravatt v.