Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterslaed

5,073 results

0.97s

  • Neeb-Kearney & Co. v. United States Dep't of Labor

    779 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 10, 1991

    of Service Contract Appeals ("the Board”). 29 C.F.R. § 8.7 (b). … The Secretary, or her designee, however, performs the functions of the Board pending the appointment of a duly constituted Board. 29 C.F.R. § 8.0 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Amalgamated Transit Union Division 1560 v. Transit Management of Southeast Louisiana, Inc.

    682 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 12, 1988

    Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerk’s Union, Local 770, 398 U.S. 235 , 90 S.Ct. 1583 , 26 L.Ed.2d 199 (1970), Seafarers International Union v. … Any minority member of the board of arbitration shall have the right to indicate his dissent to all or any part of any decision that may be handed down by the board.” See also AT & T Technologies, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Vioxx Products Liability Litigation

    401 F. Supp. 2d 565 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 18, 2005

    See, e.g., id. at 313; Moore v. Ashland Chem., Inc., 151 F.3d 269, 278-79 (5th Cir.1998); Christophersen v. Allied-Signal Corp., 939 F.2d 1106, 1114 (5th Cir.1991); Newton v. … Accordingly, the Plaintiffs motion is denied. v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Browne v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Sep 3, 2025

    P. 56(a); see also Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994). 73 Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Nationwide Agribusiness Ins. Co., 530 F.3d 395, 398–99 (5th Cir. 2008) (citing Reeves v. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986) (quoting First Nat’l Bank of Ariz. v. Cites Serv. Co., 391 U.S. 253, 289 (1968)). 77 Celotex Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kapatsos v. M/V Barlby

    238 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 15, 1965

    In Romero v. … Langnes v. Green, 282 U.S. 531 , 51 S.Ct. 243 , 75 L.Ed. 520 (1931). See also Vavatsikos v. Goulandris Brothers, Ltd., E.D.La., 1962, 208 F. Supp. 425 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Willett v. Western Oceanic, Inc.

    117 F.R.D. 379 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 20, 1987

    Coburn v. Browning Arms Co., 565 F.Supp. 742, 750 (W.D.La.1983). A new trial is generally ordered upon a finding by the District Court that the jury verdict was a result of bias, prejudice, or passion. Wells v. … Coburn v. Browning Arms Co., 565 F.Supp. 742, 751 (W.D.La.1983). The “maximum recovery rule” stands as a procedural buffer between the trial court and the sanctity of the jury verdict.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re Blanche S.

    52 F.R.D. 407 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 19, 1971

    Arizona v. California, 292 U.S. 341 , 54 S.Ct. 735 , 78 L.Ed. 1298 (1934). Petitioners’ reliance on Petition of Ernst, 2 F.R.D. 447 (S.D.Calif.1942) is misplaced. … The basis for the decision, however, was the Court’s holding that the Board was an executive agency and review by it was not a judicial determination.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Louisiana Ex Rel. Purkey v. Ciolino

    393 F. Supp. 102 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 17, 1975

    Accord, Barnes v. Dorsey, 480 F.2d 1057 (8th Cir. 1973); Szijarto v. Legeman, 466 F.2d 864 (9th Cir. 1972); Brown v. … Rosenthal v. Board of Education of Central High School District No. 3 of Town of Hempstead, 497 F.2d 726 (2nd Cir. 1974); Rakes v. Coleman, 318 F.Supp. 181 (E.D.Va.1970).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • The Pelotas

    21 F.2d 236 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 12, 1927

    Steamboat Co. v. The Son & Heir, Fed. Cas. No. 7,995; The John B. Dallas (D. C.) 94 F. 695 ; The Beaver (C. C. A.) 219 F. 139 ; The Aquitania C.) 270 F. 239 . … See Paxson v. Cunningham (C. C. A.) 63 F. 132 .

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by United States v. Stewart, 744 F.3d 17 (2014)Cited 10 timesPublished
  • A.F.

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Feb 10, 2026

    The School Board also presses that Plaintiffs failed to unearth any additional evidence to support its liability under Monell v. … The School Board bears the burden of proving its entitlement to discretionary immunity because it is an affirmative defense. Dominique v. St. Tammany Par., No. 2019-0452 (La.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • First Investment Corp. v. Fujian Mawei Shipbuilding, Ltd.

    858 F. Supp. 2d 658 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 12, 2012

    Johnston v. Multidata Sys. … of directs, directors, chairman of the board of supervisors, and supervisors of a wholly state-owned company....

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • East Jefferson Coalition for Leadership & Development v. Parish of Jefferson

    703 F. Supp. 28 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jan 19, 1989

    See White v. Weiser, 412 U.S. 783, 794-95 , 93 S.Ct. 2348, 2354-55 , 37 L.Ed.2d 335 (1973). Devising a plan is a legislative task of the parish council that this court must try not to preempt. Wise v. … Board of Estimate, 831 F.2d 384 (2nd Cir.1987) (invalidating malapportioned City Board), prob. juris, noted, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1288 , 99 L.Ed.2d 498 (1988).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Crouchet v. Texas-Pacific-Missouri-Pacific Terminal Railroad of New Orleans

    220 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 26, 1963

    . § 153 (i) which gives the National Railway Adjustment Board “exclusive primary jurisdiction”, Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oliver v. Roehm America, LLC

    District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 20, 2022

    Waste & Pollution Control Co. v Browning-Ferris, Inc., 949 F.2d 1384 (5th Cir. 1991); Egrov, Puchinsky, Afanasiev & Juring v. … Doc. 48 at 13–14; see also Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BONVILLAIN v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.

    702 F. Supp. 2d 667 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Mar 29, 2010

    The State Board of Accounts Act (SBAA), an Illinois act consulted by the court, provided that the State Board of Accounts (SBOA) was charged with examining all accounts and all financial affairs of every public office and … Co. v. Brown, 857 F.Supp. 7, 10 (W.D.N.Y.1994) (emphasizing that the fiduciary shield doctrine has been abolished by the highest court of New York State); Rolls-Royce Motors, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kindred v. Blake International Holdings, L.L.C.

    805 F. Supp. 2d 278 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Apr 15, 2011

    See Total Marine Servs., Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker’s Compensation Programs, 87 F.3d 774, 777 (5th Cir.1996) (citing Hebron v. Union Oil Co., 634 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1981)); Gaudet v. … See Brown v. Union Oil Co., 984 F.2d 674 , 676 (5th Cir.1993); Melancon, 834 F.2d at 1245; Capps, 784 F.2d at 617 . 1 *282 1.Who had Control Over the Employee and the Work He was Performing?

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • LeBeauf v. STATE BD. OF EDUCATION OF LOUISIANA

    244 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Jul 27, 1965

    244 F.Supp. 256 (1965) Lori LeBEAUF et al., Plaintiffs, v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF LOUISIANA, as a corporate body, and W. E. … supervision of the individual Parish School Boards involved rather than by direction of the State Board of Education or any of the other respondents in this action.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Giarrusso

    319 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Nov 24, 1970

    Douglas v. City of Jeanette, 319 U.S. 157 , 63 S.Ct. 877 , 87 L.Ed. 1324 (1943). … Brown to constitute a three-judge district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281 et seq., to further consider plaintiff’s application for injunctive relief. .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Java Pacific Lines

    212 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Dec 28, 1962

    Manhat v. United States, 2 Cir., 220 F.2d 143 ; Freitas v. Pacific-Atlantic SS Co., 9 Cir., 218 F.2d 562 . … -Harrell v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., Inc., D.C., 165 F.Supp. 125 ; Billeci v. United States, D.C., 185 F.Supp. 711 ; Blakenship v. Ellerman’s Wilson Line, New York, Inc., D.C., 159 F.Supp. 479 . 6.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Billizon v. Conoco Inc.

    864 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, E.D. Louisiana · Oct 12, 1994

    Plaintiffs (relatives of a Sewerage and Water Board employee who was killed in an accident) sued the Board for worker’s compensation and tort damages almost one year after Williams’ death. … The tort claim was later dropped because the Board, as employer, was immune.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.