Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,141 results
0.93s
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital
10 La.App. 3 Cir. 0278 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 2010
May 20, 1999 Incident The factual record establishes that Connie George, 7 a certified nurse assistant, moved Mrs. … The hospital’s medical records reflect clearly that Mrs. McGlothlin was consistent and immediate in her complaints about her treatment on both May 20 and May 28.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBuggage v. Buggage ex rel. Mother
257 So. 3d 755 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 2018
court, and (2) the appellate court must further determine that the record establishes that the finding is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous.... … He was qualified by the court as an expert medical doctor and in emergency management preparedness.
Cited 0 timesPublished13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1415 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 14, 2014
The trial court’s decision to terminate parental rights will not be reversed by the appellate court unless it is manifestly erroneous or clearly wrong. … Christine Dugas, a licensed clinical social worker, was also qualified as an expert. She treated E.R.S. beginning in November 2011 through March 2013. Dugas testified that therapy ended with a positive outcome.
Cited 1 timesPublished437 So. 2d 309 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 15, 1983
After doing so, the trial judge concluded that Jenkins was qualified and could serve as an impartial juror. We cannot say that the trial judge was arbitrary or unreasonable in reaching that conclusion. … Neither does it suggest any cogent reason to abandon the abovementioned policy which has been established by our supreme court (see cases cited infra). [2] We note that this case does not involve a nonconsenual entry into
Cited 11 timesPublishedMOBILE EXPLORATION v. Certain Underwriters
837 So. 2d 11 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 2002
It is well established that a trial court's finding of fact may not be set aside on appeal unless there is no reasonable factual basis in the record for the finding and the finding is clearly wrong (manifestly erroneous). … We are unable to say the factfinder's choice between the two views of the evidence was clearly wrong.
Cited 30 timesPublished16 La. App. 434 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1930
Wilton Jeansonne, that on January 17, 1930, the defendant, Richard, had been adjudged a bankrupt, and that he, said Jeansonne; having been elected trustee of the said *436 Richard in bankruptcy, had .qualified as such, and … Co. [1917] 174 Cal. 737 , 164 P. 385 ); the common purpose of riding together for pleasure does not alone establish a joint enterprise (Barry v. Harding [1923] 244 Mass. 588 , 139 N.
Cited 7 timesPublished493 So. 2d 134 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 2, 1986
The trial judge clearly disbelieved the testimony of the hospital employees that the doctor received Betadine solution and accepted the testimony of Drs. … It is established that she has a 24-year life expectancy and will be on medication for the rest of her life.
Cited 2 timesPublishedState of Louisiana v. Troherro Keith Batiste
Louisiana Court of Appeal · May 9, 2018
Clearly, both of the victim’s written statements are hearsay. … After Gurganus was given testimonial immunity, he provided unresponsive answers to the prosecutor, when asked questions about his police statement.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJames v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc.
736 So. 2d 353 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1999
, reasonable basis does not exist and the finding is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous. … Based on his field experience, he testified it affected the immune system and caused elevated somatic cell count.
Cited 7 timesPublishedState Farm Automobile Ass'n v. Morgan
97 La.App. 4 Cir. 1834 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 18, 1998
However, Hearty and subsequent Louisiana decisions have noted the unique nature of car rental agencies and the exceptions afforded to such establishments under LSA-R.S. 32:1041. … R.S. 32:900(B)(2) because the statutory language clearly and expressly indicates La.R.S. 32:900 applies specifically to 'motor vehicle’ liability po-liches].” Hearty, 574 So.2d at 1238 n. 11.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNew Orleans'dept. of Fin. v. Touro Infirm.
905 So. 2d 314 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 27, 2005
Clearly, the provisions of La. R.S. 47:337.26 did not apply to a notice given in connection with a tax audit conducted prior to July 1, 2003. The tax years covered by the audit were 1998 through 2002. … Commissioners of Orleans Levee District, 93-0690 (La.7/5/94), 640 So.2d 237, 252 , where the Supreme Court stated that "home rule abilities and immunities are to be broadly construed, and any claimed exception to them must
Cited 2 timesPublishedState of Louisiana v. Jim Howard, Jr.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 17, 2004
Howard further argued that the State failed to establish a prima facie showing of a conspiracy. In State v. … Clearly, the major reasons the Legislature passed the Habitual Offender Law were to deter and punish recidivism.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSuccession of Barreca v. Weiser
2010 La.App. 4 Cir. 0574 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 2010
Barreca’s signed application for insurance, unequivocally establishes for us that New York Life issued the policy exactly in accordance with the specific op *492 tions requested by Mr. [17Barreca in the application: a whole … Barreca in the application in order for the policy to qualify as "fully paid-up with no more premiums due” at that time. . The $20,801 essentially prepaid several years of the annual premium.
Cited 3 timesPublished862 So. 2d 108 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 12, 2003
The first line of questions by the prosecutor regarding the number of convictions, the nature of the convictions and the dates thereof was clearly countenanced by La.C.E. art. 609.1(C), which allows evidence concerning the … Additionally, the First Circuit recognized that a defendant may never have a sentence enhanced, although he commits a number of qualifying offenses. [15] Hence, the First Circuit reasoned that the adjudication date is determinative
Cited 7 timesPublishedChristine Perrin v. Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, LLC, and Abc Insurance Company
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 7, 2019
Negligence is defined as “conduct which falls below the standard of care established by law for the protection of others against an unreasonable risk of harm.” Detraz v. … We find this evidence alone was sufficient for Ochsner to meet its initial burden of establishing that Ms. Perrin will not be able to meet her burden of proving the element of duty.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Louisiana v. Juan R. Vidaurri
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 2005
We have clearly established the analysis for a claim of insufficient evidence: When the issue of sufficiency of evidence is raised on appeal, the critical inquiry of the reviewing court is whether, after viewing … “La.C.E. art. 702 states that experts may be qualified by reason of ‘knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.’
Cited 0 timesUnknown943 So. 2d 559 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 2006
As explained by the parish attorney, this system has clearly been an overwhelming success. … Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 887(A) clearly provides "such costs are recoverable by the party or parties who incurred the expense."
Cited 7 timesPublishedNick Loeb, Human Embryo 3 Hb-A, Embryo 4 Hb-A v. Sofia Vergara
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 27, 2021
… Because the bare allegations of Appellants’ petition and amended complaint establish facts that clearly support the application of the exception to the general venue rule, the burden then shifts … Boudreaux this statement is clearly false. According to Mr.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState of Louisiana v. Mark L. Magee
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 2023
Mehta, qualified as an expert in the field of child abuse, interviewed R.L. at the Audrey Hepburn Care Center. Dr. … The credibility determination of the trier of fact will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence. Id.
Cited 0 timesPublished755 So. 2d 297 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1999
The introduction of evidence that none of the vehicle's occupants knew about would clearly risk the undue consumption of time, confusion of the issues, and unfair prejudice. … Further, Defendant argued that the photographs were "clearly an effort by the prosecution to inflame the passion of the jury."
Cited 42 timesPublished
Ask Donna